Shameless pandering....
 

President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:34:26 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

he's right. he's the president of the US. he has no business telling
people what they should or shouldnt build

you right wingers kinda believe in small govt...except when you
don't.


VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

no. he's being responsible. he's right that the muslims, ridiculous
and barbaric though their religion is, have an absolute right to build
their mosque.

you right wingers simply don't believe in the constitution

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 4:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.


What's next for our boy Tom? A few rants and raves about Prop 8 in
California? Faux News, I bet, has been ranting and raving about both for
weeks.

Are Republicans racist 'tards? You might conclude that from the
percentage of blacks at the last GOP convention...about 1.4%, or from
the racist Republican 'tards who post here.

South Carolina is the perfect place for you to go, Tom. It's sort of the
Mississippi-Alabama of the 21st Century. When you move there, why not
take your little 'tard buddy Scotty with you. He'll make a great
houseboy if you can train him.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 5:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:34:26 -0400, wrote:

President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

he's right. he's the president of the US. he has no business telling
people what they should or shouldnt build

you right wingers kinda believe in small govt...except when you
don't.


VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

no. he's being responsible. he's right that the muslims, ridiculous
and barbaric though their religion is, have an absolute right to build
their mosque.

you right wingers simply don't believe in the constitution

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.



Perhaps the prez should issue an opinion on the construction of all
religious buildings, since most religions are ridiculous and barbaric.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 6:06 PM, A.Boater wrote:
So, consult your oracle, WWBD?

(What Would Bush Do)

For the sake of this exercise, you may assume he is not reading "The Pet
Goat."


Bush would be tiptoeing through the tulips, holding hands with a Saudi
prince.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Aug 14, 5:32*pm, bpuharic wrote:

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Like the forcing out of a private industry CEO? Yes, you're right...
he had no business sticking his nose in that.

But he should "lead" our country, and that would start by being
sympathetic to the thousands of people that lost someone in 9/11.
That's what he *should* be doing.

Remember how he's been conditioned: "Goddamn America!" You liberal
sheep are unbelievable.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 8/14/2010 1:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss


If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass to
put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did 9/11.


We spent what, about a billion dollars building a new embassy in Iraq,
really close to where we killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis?

How crass.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 8:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 8/14/2010 2:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:34:26 -0400, wrote:

President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

he's right. he's the president of the US. he has no business telling
people what they should or shouldnt build

Yep, he be the President of the United States.

- $1.6++ trillion deficits per year
- The money not seeing main street middle class
- Mosques where 3000 American civilians were slaughters by 19 Islam/Muslims
- 15 of those Muslims were Saudi
- Mosque is financed by the Saudi
- president of US religiously bows to Saudi.
- Obama, raised a Muslim only became christian of convenience at 27 years.
- high unemployment and low wage jobs like the middle east.
- promise of higher taxation/slavery for the masses
- like an Islam government, it is a religious state!! Islam!

Destroying America like no other Muslim could. Osama might even give
Obama a Islamic medal of honor to Obama! Osama laughs at the USA.

Priceless, the real Obama shows his real allegiances.

If you like and respect America, you will have a November gutting of
democrats and any republicans that supported Obama's waste of American
resources.


You're out of your mind. Of course, this isn't the first time you've
displayed your insanity.



--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/2010 1:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass
to put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did 9/11.

--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/2010 2:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:34:26 -0400, wrote:

President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

he's right. he's the president of the US. he has no business telling
people what they should or shouldnt build

Yep, he be the President of the United States.

- $1.6++ trillion deficits per year
- The money not seeing main street middle class
- Mosques where 3000 American civilians were slaughters by 19 Islam/Muslims
- 15 of those Muslims were Saudi
- Mosque is financed by the Saudi
- president of US religiously bows to Saudi.
- Obama, raised a Muslim only became christian of convenience at 27 years.
- high unemployment and low wage jobs like the middle east.
- promise of higher taxation/slavery for the masses
- like an Islam government, it is a religious state!! Islam!

Destroying America like no other Muslim could. Osama might even give
Obama a Islamic medal of honor to Obama! Osama laughs at the USA.

Priceless, the real Obama shows his real allegiances.

If you like and respect America, you will have a November gutting of
democrats and any republicans that supported Obama's waste of American
resources.
--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?

Shameless pandering....
 

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

But, you're not a voting man. You're a voting (maybe) idiot.

Tell us please whether or not freedom of religion should or shouldn't exist
in this country? Tell us if there would be such a protest if it was a
Christian center?

I guess you forgot about GWB consulting with Islamic leaders right after
9/11?

Never mind. You're just an idiot.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/14/10 9:25 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss


If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

But, you're not a voting man. You're a voting (maybe) idiot.

Tell us please whether or not freedom of religion should or shouldn't
exist in this country? Tell us if there would be such a protest if it
was a Christian center?

I guess you forgot about GWB consulting with Islamic leaders right after
9/11?

Never mind. You're just an idiot.



Tom's been out of sorts ever since Sarah Palin and that old fart she ran
with got their butts handed to them in 2008. Tom is a Palin fan.

It's funny he projects Palin's shortcomings onto Obama. Palin is the one
who walked away from her job to do something different. Obama was
promoted to a better job.

It's possible but unlikely Tom will engage you in any sort of serious
discussion. When posters challenge him on anything, he tends to run away
with his tail between his legs.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:59:56 -0400, Harry
wrote:

On 8/14/10 5:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:34:26 -0400, wrote:


guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.



Perhaps the prez should issue an opinion on the construction of all
religious buildings, since most religions are ridiculous and barbaric.

this is absolutely true.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:42:26 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 14, 5:32*pm, bpuharic wrote:

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Like the forcing out of a private industry CEO?

moron. bush took over GM and obama forced out the CEO since GM was
govt property

you're SUCH a hopeless moron.


But he should "lead" our country, and that would start by being
sympathetic to the thousands of people that lost someone in 9/11.
That's what he *should* be doing.

ever hear of the constitution? you might look it up sometime. true
americans respect law, this country is a country of law.


Remember how he's been conditioned: "Goddamn America!" You liberal
sheep are unbelievable.

and you right wingers think the constituion is written in crayon

right wingers hate america

Shameless pandering....
 

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:45:20 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass
to put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did 9/11.

canuck isnt american, hates america and thinks americans should burn
the constitution.

Shameless pandering....
 

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers. He is trying to inflate the voting base by letting illegals
stay and vote. Anyone who thinks he has a lock on 2012 is an idiot.
Including you.

Steve

visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com

Shameless pandering....
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 5:32 pm, bpuharic wrote:

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Like the forcing out of a private industry CEO? Yes, you're right...
he had no business sticking his nose in that.

But he should "lead" our country, and that would start by being
sympathetic to the thousands of people that lost someone in 9/11.
That's what he *should* be doing.

Remember how he's been conditioned: "Goddamn America!" You liberal
sheep are unbelievable.

reply: Some even believe that he could have done more than Bobby Jindal in
the BP mess. Something more than standing on the other side of a fence
yelling, "I'm gonna kick some ass."

Any president would have been all over that just for the photo ops and so
later they could claim they were the one who got it fixed.

Barry was too busy playing golf and vacationing to be bothered.

Steve

visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers.

Steve



When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders
to the simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the
racism that is present in much of their base.




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/15/10 11:50 AM, Steve B wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 5:32 pm, wrote:

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Like the forcing out of a private industry CEO? Yes, you're right...
he had no business sticking his nose in that.

But he should "lead" our country, and that would start by being
sympathetic to the thousands of people that lost someone in 9/11.
That's what he *should* be doing.

Remember how he's been conditioned: "Goddamn America!" You liberal
sheep are unbelievable.

reply: Some even believe that he could have done more than Bobby Jindal in
the BP mess. Something more than standing on the other side of a fence
yelling, "I'm gonna kick some ass."

Any president would have been all over that just for the photo ops and so
later they could claim they were the one who got it fixed.

Barry was too busy playing golf and vacationing to be bothered.

Steve

visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com



Jindal was mostly in the way.

And what's with the adoration of "private industry"? Haven't we all bent
over far enough so "private industry" could f--- us?


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

"Harry" wrote in message
...
On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers.

Steve



When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism that
is present in much of their base.




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Are you implying that Obama's support base is Negroes, Spanish speaking
immigrants, and union workers?

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 14/08/2010 5:10 PM, Harry wrote:
On 8/14/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 8/14/2010 1:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss



If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass to
put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did 9/11.


We spent what, about a billion dollars building a new embassy in Iraq,
really close to where we killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis?

How crass.


No, they had it coming.

--
In Alberta, Liberals are like rats, not many of them around.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 15/08/2010 10:14 AM, Harry @ news.east.earlhlink.net wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers.

Steve



When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism that
is present in much of their base.




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Are you implying that Obama's support base is Negroes, Spanish speaking
immigrants, and union workers?


They must be disappointed in Obama. He was supposed to pay for their
home and auto mortgages. Decent jobs, no luck there either.

--
In Alberta, Liberals are like rats, not many of them around.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/15/10 12:14 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/08/2010 5:10 PM, Harry wrote:
On 8/14/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 8/14/2010 1:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss




If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass to
put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did
9/11.


We spent what, about a billion dollars building a new embassy in Iraq,
really close to where we killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis?

How crass.


No, they had it coming.


You really are a moron.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

On 8/15/10 12:20 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/08/2010 10:14 AM, Harry @ news.east.earlhlink.net wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.

Steve



When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism that
is present in much of their base.




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone
knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Are you implying that Obama's support base is Negroes, Spanish speaking
immigrants, and union workers?


They must be disappointed in Obama. He was supposed to pay for their
home and auto mortgages. Decent jobs, no luck there either.



I don't say this lightly, but is it possible you are as stupid
as...Scott Ingersoll? There have been programs to boost home and auto
sales, but...I saw nothing claiming there were programs to "pay for"
homes and auto loans. "Pay for" is far-reaching. I know you righties
aren't too "swift" with language, but seriously...




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering....
 

"Harry" wrote in message
m...
On 8/15/10 12:14 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/08/2010 5:10 PM, Harry wrote:
On 8/14/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 8/14/2010 1:34 PM, W1TEF wrote:
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss




If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess those saying Obama be a Muslim supporter are right. How crass
to
put the thing so close to 9/11 where 19 Muslims (15 from Saudi) did
9/11.


We spent what, about a billion dollars building a new embassy in Iraq,
really close to where we killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis?

How crass.


No, they had it coming.


You really are a moron.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Is that you, de plume?

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Shameless pandering.... a view from the outside
 

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

So, as a stalwart believer in equal rights and freedom of religion, not to
mention States rights to govern themselves, on what legal and ethical
grounds would you suggest he oppose this construction?
When the right wants him (and the fed gov't) to butt out on AZ/ immigration
but throw rocks about the above, all of these arguments lose credibility
with anyone who doesn't have a party ring in their nose.
I'm not pro - Obama, not pro -mosque nor am I pro- open borders, I'm just
anti- bull****, and this has got that meter pegged Tom.
Try to have a better option to vote for in 2012. Someone other than Klondike
Barbie.

Shameless pandering.... a view from the outside
 

mmc wrote:
"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

So, as a stalwart believer in equal rights and freedom of religion, not to
mention States rights to govern themselves, on what legal and ethical
grounds would you suggest he oppose this construction?
When the right wants him (and the fed gov't) to butt out on AZ/ immigration
but throw rocks about the above, all of these arguments lose credibility
with anyone who doesn't have a party ring in their nose.
I'm not pro - Obama, not pro -mosque nor am I pro- open borders, I'm just
anti- bull****, and this has got that meter pegged Tom.
Try to have a better option to vote for in 2012. Someone other than Klondike
Barbie.


Most time spent talking to wingnuts is wasted.
But they should be given hell when they want to subvert the law or
constitution.
Just offhand, seems to me the libs are prone to subverting the law, the
conservatives to subverting the Constitution.
Pick your poison.

Jim - I don't like Kool-Ade.

Shameless pandering.... a view from the outside
 

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:51:31 -0400, "mmc" wrote:




So, as a stalwart believer in equal rights and freedom of religion, not to
mention States rights to govern themselves, on what legal and ethical
grounds would you suggest he oppose this construction?

the right nuts never tell us on what basis the 1st amendment is
subject to their whims

Shameless pandering....
 

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 08:50:10 -0700, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 5:32 pm, bpuharic wrote:

guess you guys don't realize when the president should just stay out
of things.

Like the forcing out of a private industry CEO? Yes, you're right...
he had no business sticking his nose in that.

you seem to have forgotten we own the company.

you're a moron so dont keep up with the news. rush isn't doing it for
you


But he should "lead" our country, and that would start by being
sympathetic to the thousands of people that lost someone in 9/11.
That's what he *should* be doing.

i dont recal reading in the 1st amendment to the constitution that it
can be suspended if a religion offends someone.

can you point out where it says that?

i personally am offended by the catholic church and its homophobia and
its policy of raping children

should we stop catholic churches from being built near schools?

i am a scientist. i'm offended by the s. baptsts being creationists.

should we stop building baptist churches nears universities and
research centers?

you offer nothing except incoherent bull****.


Remember how he's been conditioned: "Goddamn America!" You liberal
sheep are unbelievable.

uh no. more bull****. go ahead prove to me where he said that

it acxtually was his preacher that said that.

should we put him in prison?

the irght belives that the constitution is written in crayon

Shameless pandering....
 

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
President Obama says he supports the right to build it, but won't
comment on whether or not it should be built.

VOTING PRESENT!! Again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us...er=rss&emc=rss

If I was a betting man, I could be convinced that the President is
tired of being President and is setting himself up for a Party
election defeat in 2010 and a general election defeat in 2012 -
assuming he decides to run again which, maybe, he might not. He can
blame it on all those folks who won't let go of their guns and bibles
and of course, all those racist 'tards who vote Republican.

We could be in for another Lyndon Johnson moment in the near future.

It would fit his MO of being at a job for a little while, then going
on to something different. There ain't much more to go to though
other than President of The World or some such. Maybe Secretary
General of the UN?

Stay tuned.

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers. He is trying to inflate the voting base by letting
illegals stay and vote. Anyone who thinks he has a lock on 2012 is an
idiot. Including you.

Steve

visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com



I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

Shameless pandering....
 

"Harry" wrote in message
...
On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers.

Steve



When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism that
is present in much of their base.




--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

Shameless pandering.... a view from the outside
 

On 8/15/2010 12:35 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:51:31 -0400, wrote:




So, as a stalwart believer in equal rights and freedom of religion, not to
mention States rights to govern themselves, on what legal and ethical
grounds would you suggest he oppose this construction?

the right nuts never tell us on what basis the 1st amendment is
subject to their whims

First amendment protects you too.

Otherwise if you want to wave your first amendment rights, maybe someone
will sew your mouth **** and take away your keyboard/Internet.
--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?

Shameless pandering....
 

On Aug 15, 3:17*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message

...



On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. *He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and government
union workers.

Steve

When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism that
is present in much of their base.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

Shameless pandering.... a view from the outside
 

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:41:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 8/15/2010 12:35 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:51:31 -0400, wrote:




So, as a stalwart believer in equal rights and freedom of religion, not to
mention States rights to govern themselves, on what legal and ethical
grounds would you suggest he oppose this construction?

the right nuts never tell us on what basis the 1st amendment is
subject to their whims

First amendment protects you too.

Otherwise if you want to wave your first amendment rights, maybe someone
will sew your mouth **** and take away your keyboard/Internet.

you seem not to realize that when you right wingers take away others'
rights

you take away your own.

but you're kinda stupid that way

Shameless pandering....
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message

...



On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.

Steve

When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

You don't have the brains to guess.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Aug 16, 12:25*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...



On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message

...

On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. *He is building his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.

Steve

When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

You don't have the brains to guess.

Using your own quote qualified me for mental instability, D'Plume?

Is that truly the best you can do?

Shameless pandering....
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 12:25 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...



On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message

...

On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building
his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.

Steve

When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous
president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders
to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone
knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

You don't have the brains to guess.

Using your own quote qualified me for mental instability, D'Plume?

Is that truly the best you can do?

Using my own quote over and over by you qualifies you as a small-minded
moron. It's the best you can do. I get it.

Shameless pandering....
 

On Aug 16, 2:11*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...



On Aug 16, 12:25 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....

On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message

...

On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:

I guess you don't follow current events very well. *He is building
his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.

Steve

When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?

Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous
president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders
to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone
knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Do you really think it mattered?

I don't have to guess that you're a moron.

You don't have the brains to guess.

Using your own quote qualified me for mental instability, D'Plume?

Is that truly the best you can do?

Using my own quote over and over by you qualifies you as a small-minded
moron. It's the best you can do. I get it.

"You're a liar. You can't help but read what I post. "

Shameless pandering....
 

TopBassDog wrote:
On Aug 16, 2:11 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...




On Aug 16, 12:25 am, wrote:

wrote in message


....


On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, wrote:

wrote in message


...


On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:


I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building
his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.


Steve


When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?


Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous
president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders
to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone
knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Do you really think it mattered?


I don't have to guess that you're a moron.


You don't have the brains to guess.


Using your own quote qualified me for mental instability, D'Plume?


Is that truly the best you can do?

Using my own quote over and over by you qualifies you as a small-minded
moron. It's the best you can do. I get it.

"You're a liar. You can't help but read what I post."

Let the miserable bitch go. You will thank me later.

Shameless pandering....
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
TopBassDog wrote:
On Aug 16, 2:11 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...




On Aug 16, 12:25 am, wrote:

wrote in message


....


On Aug 15, 3:17 pm, wrote:

wrote in message


...


On 8/15/10 11:47 AM, Steve B wrote:


I guess you don't follow current events very well. He is building
his
voting base by continuing to pander to blacks, hispanics, and
government
union workers.


Steve


When you had that bypass surgery, steve-io, how long was the blood
supply
to your brain cut off?


Every politician "panders" to his or her base. The previous
president
pandered to oil and corporate interests, crazy christians, those
who
deny
science and, of course, saudis. Your heroine, sarah palin, panders
to
the
simple-minded and uneducated. Many republicans pander to the racism
that
is present in much of their base.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone
knows.
If
a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an
ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.


Do you really think it mattered?


I don't have to guess that you're a moron.


You don't have the brains to guess.


Using your own quote qualified me for mental instability, D'Plume?


Is that truly the best you can do?

Using my own quote over and over by you qualifies you as a small-minded
moron. It's the best you can do. I get it.

"You're a liar. You can't help but read what I post."

Let the miserable bitch go. You will thank me later.

Ah, another guy who thinks calling a woman a bitch will enhance his
"stature." It won't. You still have a small pee pee.