In article ,
says...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:32:44 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

the finacial sector went up to 40% of GDP in
2007 and added NOTHING to ameirca

The financial sector will have to add a whole lot more to the GDP if
the boomers actually want to retire.
Where do you think pension money comes from?
Retirement is money making money.

Amen brother.

I actually believe the "greatest generation" will be the last ones to
actually complete retirement and not outlive their money simply
because the boomers covered them with our 401k and FICA money.
There are not enough kids behind us to support 75-80 million boomers
on a pension.

Amen brother.

On 8/10/10 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:32:44 -0400, wrote:

the finacial sector went up to 40% of GDP in
2007 and added NOTHING to ameirca

The financial sector will have to add a whole lot more to the GDP if
the boomers actually want to retire.
Where do you think pension money comes from?
Retirement is money making money.

Amen brother.

I actually believe the "greatest generation" will be the last ones to
actually complete retirement and not outlive their money simply
because the boomers covered them with our 401k and FICA money.
There are not enough kids behind us to support 75-80 million boomers
on a pension.

Amen brother.


Sure there is. We simply have to re-order our priorities. For starters,
we can cut the military budget in half as soon as employment picks up.
That would represent a savings of what, at least $400 billion dollars?

On 10-Aug-2010, "Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net"
wrote:

actually complete retirement and not outlive their money simply
because the boomers covered them with our 401k and FICA money.
There are not enough kids behind us to support 75-80 million boomers
on a pension.

Amen brother.


Sure there is. We simply have to re-order our priorities. For starters,
we can cut the military budget in half as soon as employment picks up.
That would represent a savings of what, at least $400 billion dollars?

As asinine as that comment is, it makes sense in a strange way considering
the bedwetters you elect won't use them anyway for anything but delivering
food baskets to the enemy.

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:51:46 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:32:44 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

the finacial sector went up to 40% of GDP in
2007 and added NOTHING to ameirca

The financial sector will have to add a whole lot more to the GDP if
the boomers actually want to retire.
Where do you think pension money comes from?
Retirement is money making money.

Amen brother.

I actually believe the "greatest generation" will be the last ones to
actually complete retirement and not outlive their money simply
because the boomers covered them with our 401k and FICA money.
There are not enough kids behind us to support 75-80 million boomers
on a pension.

Amen brother.

then where is the money

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:15:20 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:53:15 -0400, bpuharic wrote:



Amen brother.

then where is the money

There is no money, that is the point.
The trillions that disappeared from the economy never existed in the
first place. It was just betting slips from those hedge fund bookies
like Soros.

soros was peanuts compared to the 11 TRILLION sucked out of the
economy by wall street hedgefund managers

On 10-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

There is no money, that is the point.
The trillions that disappeared from the economy never existed in the
first place. It was just betting slips from those hedge fund bookies
like Soros.

soros was peanuts compared to the 11 TRILLION sucked out of the
economy by wall street hedgefund managers

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot be
regenerated.

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:00:05 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

There is no money, that is the point.
The trillions that disappeared from the economy never existed in the
first place. It was just betting slips from those hedge fund bookies
like Soros.

soros was peanuts compared to the 11 TRILLION sucked out of the
economy by wall street hedgefund managers

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot be
regenerated.

and the free market fundamentalists, with their right wing
mythology...are just amazed when it blows up in their faces

On 13-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot
be
regenerated.

and the free market fundamentalists, with their right wing
mythology...are just amazed when it blows up in their faces

The "free market fundamentalists" you fantasize about aren't taking it up
the ass; you are. Get used to it, your voting and purchasing habits assure
it won't change for generations.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:36:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 13-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot
be
regenerated.

and the free market fundamentalists, with their right wing
mythology...are just amazed when it blows up in their faces

The "free market fundamentalists" you fantasize about aren't taking it up
the ass; you are.

that's true. the free market fundies raped the american middle class
and you right wingers just go out and buy KY jelly because you hate
normal americans

Get used to it, your voting and purchasing habits assure
it won't change for generations.

since i never voted for the right, it seems i have more faith in the
US than you do