Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.


You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 1:17Â*pm, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, Â* Â* Â*wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry Â* Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! Â*The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. Â*You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. Â*A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. Â*A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. Â*No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency.. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. Â*And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. Â*He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. Â*I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Â*Why? Â*Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. Â*You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Â*Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. Â*I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Â*Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.

You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

About a dozen replies by you this morning shows otherwise. Maybe you
should turn on that trashbin you used to be so proud of, eh? :-

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 1:23 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 1:17 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.

You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

About a dozen replies by you this morning shows otherwise. Maybe you
should turn on that trashbin you used to be so proud of, eh? :-

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire.


No, it doesn't mean you think it means, jackoff. It just means that I
like twiddling with you and calling you by the name your mama gave you.

I see you suffer from the usual rightie syndrome...you believe usenet
responses to your posts have some meaning for those who respond.

Ta-ta, Jackoff.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 9:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...





On Aug 2, 7:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...

On Aug 2, 6:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:33:32 -0400, Harry ?

wrote:

You really are working extra hard trying to rationalize and
excuse
the
behavior of Breitbart.

I am just addressing the reality
It is fun to think he will get his comeuppance but it is not
likely.

We won't know anything until/unless a suit is filed.

I just think it will be better for all concerned if this just
goes
away. I am sure Obama would not want this to be dominating the
news
cycle during the elections.
We certainly have far more important issues.

I totally disagree. I think it should go forward and be addressed.
This
bs
about racism supposedly perpetrated by the NAACP and other minority
organizations needs to see the light of day disinfectant.

It already has. Didn't you hear the audience cheering?

You're a right-wingnut moron.

Weak, childish taunts are all you have?

What about the fact that the NAACP members were cheering her
description of how she was a racist? Are you really so blind as to
think that rasism doesn't exist in the NAACP?

You're the child. Why don't you listen to some more Rush/Palin/Breitbart.
I'm sure you would be better informed than the rest of us.

There you go again.

No. You're the one who keeps claiming things that are false. That would be
the R/P/B crowd.

Obviously there's racism in most organizations. There are always going to
be
people who can't put aside the fact that people look differently or act
differently.

And now you may be coming around...
There *are* racist people around us. They are in the Tea Party, the
Democratic Party, and in the NAACP.

You and those like you seem to think that because a few people
are prejudice that means it's an entire organization.

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org. You've reasoned it out for
yourself. Now talk to the others that think like you and explain it
to them.

cya

Moron. I never said the teepee was a racist organization. If anything, I
said there were a bunch of racists in it, and it's fairly monocolor...
white. They're not the American Nazi Party, unless you're going to claim
that they're not a racist organization either?

If your father was lynched by a black crowd, do you think you might be a bit
hesitant to "help" blacks? That's what happened to Sherrod .. her father was
murdered and no one was prosecuted. Yet, she overcame her prejudice.
Breithart mis-represented her journey through her prejudicial feelings.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs, tee-shirts,
and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork and phrases
on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history when we were
plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not fully
endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts,
and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork and phrases
on
them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history when we were
plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully
endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.



Uh, it was Harry that said he went by rallies in Washington and saw
signs? Well, there you go, you know it's a lie, why bother... Just like
the lies the DNC told about racial slurs on the steps of the congress,
it's all a big setup..

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

Again with the lies. There were certainly instances of people hurling slurs
and spitting on Congressman. It's a documented fact.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.




You must be pretty insulated to not know racism when you see or hear it.

Would $10 million do it?
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:16:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:55:45 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:03:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

defamation was not by Breitbart anyway. He is just the one who
posted
the excerpts of the tape on his blog. The first thing they have to
prove is that he saw the whole tape. I have not heard that he was
the
one who selected the excerpts, only that he posted them.

Nope. Don't have to prove he saw the whole tape. They have to prove he
willfully misrepresented her words.

If that is the test, Vilsack belongs in the dock too.

?? Vilsack didn't publish the lie.

What lie? It sounds more like an opinion by a prejudiced person.
This was simply an edited tape. There WERE her words. She admits she
used to be a racist and then says she is reformed.

Come on. Breitbart knew it was misleading, but he promoted it as the
truth.

The first thing someone would have to prove is that Breitbart actually
saw the unedited tape and knew that she says she was reformed. Then
you have to prove he believed it. He can always say, in his opinion,
the reformation was a lie.

In your opinion. Fortunately, you're not an attorney!

Then you would have to prove he did not have the right to publish his
OPINION about it.

In your opinion.

It was very easy for liberal democrats to jump to the wrong
conclusion. It would even be easier to think a right winger could have
tunnel vision when they viewed the tape, even if they saw it all.

So, instead of Breitbart being the instigator, it's somehow morphed into
the
entire fault of those who over-reacted?

Nice try, but that doesn't cut it. I suspect Breitbart is going to settle
as
fast as possible or try to. She didn't impress me as someone who's afraid
of
a fight.




That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You can't
express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.



Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.

Yup. I'm a moron.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:16:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:55:45 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
om...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:03:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:

defamation was not by Breitbart anyway. He is just the one who
posted
the excerpts of the tape on his blog. The first thing they have to
prove is that he saw the whole tape. I have not heard that he was
the
one who selected the excerpts, only that he posted them.

Nope. Don't have to prove he saw the whole tape. They have to prove
he
willfully misrepresented her words.

If that is the test, Vilsack belongs in the dock too.

?? Vilsack didn't publish the lie.

What lie? It sounds more like an opinion by a prejudiced person.
This was simply an edited tape. There WERE her words. She admits she
used to be a racist and then says she is reformed.

Come on. Breitbart knew it was misleading, but he promoted it as the
truth.

The first thing someone would have to prove is that Breitbart actually
saw the unedited tape and knew that she says she was reformed. Then
you have to prove he believed it. He can always say, in his opinion,
the reformation was a lie.

In your opinion. Fortunately, you're not an attorney!

Then you would have to prove he did not have the right to publish his
OPINION about it.

In your opinion.

It was very easy for liberal democrats to jump to the wrong
conclusion. It would even be easier to think a right winger could have
tunnel vision when they viewed the tape, even if they saw it all.

So, instead of Breitbart being the instigator, it's somehow morphed into
the
entire fault of those who over-reacted?

Nice try, but that doesn't cut it. I suspect Breitbart is going to settle
as
fast as possible or try to. She didn't impress me as someone who's afraid
of
a fight.




That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You
can't express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).



Ahhh. So we have 4 not so real lawyers arguing legal protocol. Better make
another batch of popcorn.