"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/28/10 11:29 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jul 28, 10:30 am, "Harry wrote:
"Harry wrote in message

m...





On 7/28/10 10:18 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president
on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View."
But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy
Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer
would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for
the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine
a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout...ts_of_America_...

What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...

Naturally, the gist of the web article, about the discriminatory
practices
of the Boy Scouts, went right over the head of Tosk, the ranking (and
rank) dummy in rec.boats.

,You always have to consider the source. Me. I'm a little skeptical
about
anything containes at this site.http://atheism.about.comThat's just me.

--
Me

It's a rant/blog written by a nutjob.

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.


As a private organization that is blatantly discriminatory, the Boy Scouts
should not receive any public funding, nor should they be able to use any
public facilities, nor should any public officials have anything to do
with them.

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and sea
scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our activities.

You enjoyed the activities because you didn't have to put up with queers
groping you in your pup tent.

--
Me