Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry ? wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.


Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.


That is BS.

But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses.


gee. where''s it going?

oh. it's not

more right wing bull****

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

On 24/07/2010 4:03 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600,
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry ? wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.

Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.


That is BS.

But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses.


gee. where''s it going?

oh. it's not

more right wing bull****


China, India, Brazil to name a few.

Which you pick, owning profitable Tata Motors or Obama Government Motors?



--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:07:49 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/07/2010 4:03 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600,
wrote:

But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses.


gee. where''s it going?

oh. it's not

more right wing bull****


China, India, Brazil to name a few.

Which you pick, owning profitable Tata Motors or Obama Government Motors?


guess the moron doesnt realize the single biggest selling brand in
china right now

is general motors

  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

On 24/07/2010 9:32 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:07:49 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/07/2010 4:03 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600,
wrote:

But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses.

gee. where''s it going?

oh. it's not

more right wing bull****


China, India, Brazil to name a few.

Which you pick, owning profitable Tata Motors or Obama Government Motors?


guess the moron doesnt realize the single biggest selling brand in
china right now

is general motors



It is why the government should sell GM to the Chinese. They can send
their management over here to fix things.

Think, Americans getting taxed so that Chinese can have autos.... LMAO.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default Yo!! WF3H!!


"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 24/07/2010 4:03 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600,
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry ? wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.

Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.

That is BS.

But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses.


gee. where''s it going?

oh. it's not

more right wing bull****


China, India, Brazil to name a few.

Which you pick, owning profitable Tata Motors or Obama Government Motors?



--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?


You're just an idiot. The "smart money" is always moving.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CQ WF3H Tom Francis - SWSports General 4 September 25th 09 12:13 AM
PING: Wf3h Tim General 4 September 7th 09 05:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017