Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2010
Posts: 190
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

Harry  wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)


I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.


Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.

Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending?
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default Yo!! WF3H!!

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:19:56 -0400, Larry wrote:

Harry ? wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.


Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.

Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending?


actually george bush spent 9% of GDP his last year in offcie...what
obama is now spending

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default Yo!! WF3H!!


"Larry" wrote in message
...
Harry  wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of
citizenship. We should be required to pay more.


Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%.

Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending?


Fortunately for you, you won't be affected, since 1) you're very poor and 2)
you're an idiot.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CQ WF3H Tom Francis - SWSports General 4 September 25th 09 12:13 AM
PING: Wf3h Tim General 4 September 7th 09 05:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017