On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:58:55 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:45:43 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens.

Heh - So I take it that all your hollering about the rich raping the
land and citizenry is also not relevant to anything? To be
consistent, if I parse what you say right, the rich should be taxed to
hell and gone to save the little guy and now it's ok as long as
"something" is left for the little guy.

Well, at least you are consistent in your inconsistency.

but this is a lesson to right wingers. you guys invent crap like the
immune system invents antibodies.

Whoa dude - what part about "considering delay of the tax hikes"
didn't you understand. I didn't make that up - thems the facts.

first it was breitbart and his crap
about the USDA official's racism...

What's that got to do with this?

dont you guys learn that faux news lies to you?

You know, believe it or not, I rarely watch FOX news - I generally
watch CBS news if I watch national news at all.

And I repeat - thems the facts - gotta love them facts. :)