![]() |
California and Arizona
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 17/07/2010 10:14 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600, wrote: Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one. you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him 'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....' he's all for it Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in order. Ah... so that's when you were deported and now can't get back into this great country. |
California and Arizona
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:01:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 17/07/2010 10:14 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600, wrote: Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one. you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him 'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....' he's all for it Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in order. he doesnt know the difference between a license to operate a vehicle and having your papers to prove you're an american but he's a fascist canadian...very very stuipd |
California and Arizona
wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:09:45 -0400, bpuharic wrote: Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in order. he doesnt know the difference between a license to operate a vehicle and having your papers to prove you're an american Since the feds passed "Real ID" that is going to be the same thing. The cop can use the unique ID number on the back of your license (buried on the mag stripe and in that dot code) and find out everything the government knows about you. That is why an Arizona driver's license is "papers", Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal issue. |
California and Arizona
|
California and Arizona
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:14:41 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one. you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him 'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....' he's all for it You've never been asked for ID or a license? -- John H |
California and Arizona
|
California and Arizona
wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal issue. The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case. I believe MMS was doping just fine. :) There's a difference between ENFORCEMENT and creating new laws. New laws are the domain of the Fed in this case. There are lots of things that the Fed screws up. That doesn't give states license to be creatively making new law. I'm glad you're able to predict the future. Can you tell us who'll be replacing Scalia? |
California and Arizona
wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:15:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal issue. The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case. I believe MMS was doping just fine. :) Huh? Your post had a small typo. :) There's a difference between ENFORCEMENT and creating new laws. New laws are the domain of the Fed in this case. There are lots of things that the Fed screws up. That doesn't give states license to be creatively making new law. There are thousands of state laws that mirror federal law., Are you saying a state can't have a law against kidnapping? No. I'm saying that AZ created a new law that doesn't just mirror Fed law. You can't even make a 14th amendment case since you do not have the right to violate federal law. They usurped Federal law. That's a no-no. I'm glad you're able to predict the future. Can you tell us who'll be replacing Scalia? I have been pretty good at predicting the future so far. I did say Goldman would come out of their case OK. They ended up copping to admitting they might have had better disclosure and gave the government part of what they made on the deal. |
California and Arizona
wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:16:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: A Florida license (Real ID) is "papers" in Arizona. They will pull up everything they need to determine my citizenship from the mag stripe on the back of my license. The real burden is on women with "real ID" since they will have to produce every marriage license and divorce decree to get their license (or get it renewed). You have to document every name change. Fort me it was real easy. They just wanted to see my DD214 and that allowed me to skip a lot of the paperwork. The same was true of Social Security. Yet, Florida didn't create a new law to do this. Thus, your argument is without merit. Florida enforces immigration policy without a new law. They just do it. When a cop catches an illegal, they call INS. Which is fine and normal. They didn't create a new one, claiming Federal action is inadequate. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com