"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:26 -0700, "Califbill"

wrote:



"DAB" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head
homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Blanket party time?

Yes Sir.

I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the
barracks,
dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys."

Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both
against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their
jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit
will
protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the
British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most
units
will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of
fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that
has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action.

I think you may be right, in most cases. It really depends on the gay and
how he
behaves with regard to his duty and his personal interactions with the
rest of
his unit. If he's one who is flaunting his gayness in their faces, he
won't last
long, or his behavior will change.
--

I hope your day is simply *SPECTACULAR* !!

John H

You're a moron. A lot "depends on the (person" and how "he (or she) behaves.