On Jul 7, 5:52*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:36:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:08:25 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.
`

I only need one example. Rubin. He was Clinton't chief economic
advisor. He is the one who pushed congress to remove regulation on the
banks, then he went to work for Citigroup and they gave him over $100
million bucks. Isn't that exactly the kind of rich ******* you are
railing on about?

i absolutely agree the right wing had GREAT marketiing over the last
30 years. and they still do. look at the tea baggers telling us that,
if we DONT regulate wall street, everything will be just great.

people bought that ****. *they still do. wall street money is flowing
into GOP coffers at record rates.

Nope... not according to your own article.


the GOP is still protecting the rich

It's the DNC that was, and still is, in bed with Wall Street.

I love it that your article proves that the Dems were the party on the
take from Wall Street during the crash.

On 06/07/2010 9:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, wrote:

ROFLMAO!!! Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS

past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street

while the
excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?


We haven't really had a Democrat president in the fiscal sense since
Jimmy Carter

this is known as the 'no true scotsman' fallacy. no scotsmen drink,
you see. you point out a scotsman who DOES and it's proof he's not a
scotsman

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.

You are begining to sound like Polly.

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

On 07/07/2010 5:51 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jul 7, 5:52 am, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:36:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:08:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, wrote:

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.
`

I only need one example. Rubin. He was Clinton't chief economic
advisor. He is the one who pushed congress to remove regulation on the
banks, then he went to work for Citigroup and they gave him over $100
million bucks. Isn't that exactly the kind of rich ******* you are
railing on about?

i absolutely agree the right wing had GREAT marketiing over the last
30 years. and they still do. look at the tea baggers telling us that,
if we DONT regulate wall street, everything will be just great.

people bought that ****. they still do. wall street money is flowing
into GOP coffers at record rates.

Nope... not according to your own article.


the GOP is still protecting the rich

It's the DNC that was, and still is, in bed with Wall Street.

I love it that your article proves that the Dems were the party on the
take from Wall Street during the crash.

I would say democrats are pandering to the corrupt of Wall Street, GM,
Chrysler, banks etc.

Most business do not want bailouts, corruption as they realize in the
end we are all going to pay dearly for Obama's debt-spend crazy
mentality. And incase anyone does not notice, Obamanomics isn't working
anyway.

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:51:03 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 7, 5:52*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:36:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:08:25 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.
`

I only need one example. Rubin. He was Clinton't chief economic
advisor. He is the one who pushed congress to remove regulation on the
banks, then he went to work for Citigroup and they gave him over $100
million bucks. Isn't that exactly the kind of rich ******* you are
railing on about?

i absolutely agree the right wing had GREAT marketiing over the last
30 years. and they still do. look at the tea baggers telling us that,
if we DONT regulate wall street, everything will be just great.

people bought that ****. *they still do. wall street money is flowing
into GOP coffers at record rates.

Nope... not according to your own article.

gee. the headline even said it was. whatsamatter? being right wing
stop you from reading



the GOP is still protecting the rich

It's the DNC that was, and still is, in bed with Wall Street.

nope. as the article says, wall street is getting nailed by the dems.
it's the GOP which is stopping all reform


I love it that your article proves that the Dems were the party on the
take from Wall Street during the crash.

yep. they took the money and stabbed wall street in the back when wall
street screwed the public

but now the GOP and the right wing has stepped up to defend the rich.
as they always have

On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:23:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


I would say democrats are pandering to the corrupt of Wall Street, GM,
Chrysler, banks etc.

i guess that's why the GOP is now getting wall street money


Most business do not want bailouts, corruption as they realize in the
end we are all going to pay dearly for Obama's debt-spend crazy
mentality.

ROFLMAO!! the GOP was the largest spenders in history! the GOP
bankrupted america. NOW the right bitches because the bill has to be
paid!

And incase anyone does not notice, Obamanomics isn't working
anyway.

in a sense that's true. the rich white boy bush ****ed this country so
hard it's still bleeding.

On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:20:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 06/07/2010 9:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:


you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.

You are begining to sound like Polly.

and you're sounding like william luther pierce

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:05:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 6, 9:47*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:30:26 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street


Remember my linked article? It's Barney Frank, a Dem, who is going to
save them.

so you say. unfortunately he can't. only the GOP can filibuster. sorry


excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?

From your own article:
"Donors from that area have given $8.7 million this year, compared
with $23.9 million at this point in the 2008 cycle,

gee. wall street is so in love with what the dems are doing that
they've dropped donations by 75%.

yeah. im sure that's a love affair


IOW, Wall Street installed the Dems, and Dems protected them with
their majorities. Until it all collapsed...

ROFLMAO!! it was the RIGHT WING...alan greenspan, milton friedman,
phil gramm who screamed that hte market was efficient and must be left
alone

remember: smaller govt? less regulation? just like the tea baggers
today

how'd that work out?




Wall Street has come to their senses and is backing the correct party
now. *They don't want the US to fail... that would kill their profits.

so they figure they'll buy the GOP and make sure they can continue to
steal.

uh huh

But your article doesn't support your assertions...
"The two Republican committees that are focused on congressional races
have received $2.7 million from the New York area, slightly more than
at this point in 2008 but less than the $4 million they raised at this
point in the 2004 cycle when the party still controlled Congress."

and the donations to the dems?

dropped by 75%. sure looks like wall street is getting its dick
sucked by the right wing.


The Dems lost about 15 million, and the GOP has picked up a million or
so. Sounds more like Wall Street has just quit giving, period.

gee. i guess that's why the GOP recently held a closed door meeting
with 25 of wall street's top bankers


Who else are buying the Dems? Where is all that big money coming
from? Corruption runs deep in the DNC. Uh-huh.

yeah. makes alot of sense with the 75% drop in bribe money from wall
street

your logic is impeccable.