| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Drill here drill now
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in
spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. |
Drill here drill now
On May 24, 10:36*am, Frogwatch wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. *IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. *So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/10 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms Are you ****ingcrazy? Yes, you are. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On May 24, 10:36*am, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. *IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. *So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/10 11:26 AM, John H wrote:
"When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." Now, *that* would get me to a walmart, to see if herring the racist is dead and to **** on his grave. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Does your wife look at you and shake her head like the Aflac duck? |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 9:26 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head. Does mean then Obama is bribable, so in either case Obama is a screwup. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 9:02 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms Are you ****ingcrazy? Yes, you are. Depends, my guess is everything wrong in the gulf is BPs fault, and the charlitains and the losers are sharpening their knives. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
Drill here drill now
"hk" wrote in message m... On 5/24/10 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms Are you ****ingcrazy? Yes, you are. -- Someone should administer a drug test on Froggy. |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/2010 11:33 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 11:26 AM, John H wrote: "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." Now, *that* would get me to a walmart, to see if herring the racist is dead and to **** on his grave. And that could get you arrested too. Not that that would be a bad thing. The krause family seems to be plagued with deviant behavior. Did they ever catch up to your brother Ray Harry Krause? Originally from Florida but last seen in Maryland. There's a strong family resemblance so don't try to deny he's your Kin. |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. |
Drill here drill now
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Yeah, it's only the size of the Exxon spill every three days. Spill Baby Spill. |
Drill here drill now
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... On May 24, 10:36 am, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! |
Drill here drill now
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 24/05/2010 9:26 AM, John H wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head. Does mean then Obama is bribable, so in either case Obama is a screwup. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. In all cases, you're stupid. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 11:02 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Governemnt is no different than a welfare dependant person like you or de-fumer. They want more money and provide nothing for it. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:50 -0400, moose wrote:
On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote: On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. Absolutely. Obama's folks have been in bed with BP from the gitgo. "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals." http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 Of course, Reuters is just another right wing rag. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." |
Drill here drill now
"John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:50 -0400, moose wrote: On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote: On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. Absolutely. Obama's folks have been in bed with BP from the gitgo. "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals." http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 Of course, Reuters is just another right wing rag. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." So, I guess you can't read... "over the past 20 years" is quite telling. Who were former oil men? Bush/Cheney. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. Yeah, that's why heathcare reform and financial reform passed. You're an idiot. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! To you, everyone is a lunatic or idiot. Does that not give you a hint on your mental state? Perhaps you should ease off of pbuharics drugs and seek some serious help. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Drill here drill now
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! To you, everyone is a lunatic or idiot. Does that not give you a hint on your mental state? Perhaps you should ease off of pbuharics drugs and seek some serious help. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. No. You're the prime idiot here. Perhaps you should go back to school. |
Drill here drill now
On 5/24/2010 3:42 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:50 -0400, moose wrote: On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote: On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. Absolutely. Obama's folks have been in bed with BP from the gitgo. "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals." http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 Of course, Reuters is just another right wing rag. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." So, I guess you can't read... "over the past 20 years" is quite telling. Who were former oil men? Bush/Cheney. That was quite dishonest, assuming you can read. Here's more. "over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama," Now that's what I call "quite telling". And Obama isn't even an oil man................................yet. |
Drill here drill now
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. ---- Bush and Cheney did away with the requirement for the valve that would have stopped the flow at the ocean floor. Saved the oil companies $500k per. But, WTF? Let's blame it on Obama. |
OT Drill here drill now
|
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On May 24, 10:36*am, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. *IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. *So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. ROFLMAO!! it was CHENEY who gave them the waiver for the acoustic switch on the BOP!! cheney aint obama, dude! You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. yeah. tell us how bush cared about the darkies in the big easy. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:50:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? yep. guess he'll have to reconsider OR regulate the industry...which bush never did After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. guess the moron doesn't know that 71% of all oil money goes tot he GOP rush hasnt let him in on the secret |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:58:43 -0400, John smith wrote:
"When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." So, I guess you can't read... "over the past 20 years" is quite telling. Who were former oil men? Bush/Cheney. That was quite dishonest, assuming you can read. Here's more. "over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama," Now that's what I call "quite telling". And Obama isn't even an oil man................................yet. obama hasnt been in politics for 20 years. and 71% of oil money goes to the GOP |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:33:39 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: Governemnt is no different than a welfare dependant person like you or de-fumer. They want more money and provide nothing for it. tell it to the marines |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:59:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. he brought universal health care a growing GDP unemployment projected to drop by 5% at the end of the year... if this is failure, i'll take it |
Drill here drill now
hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 11:26 AM, John H wrote: "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." Now, *that* would get me to a walmart, to see if herring the racist is dead and to **** on his grave. How nice. Do you share these amazing posts with your (alleged) family and (alleged) colleagues? |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 4:12 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:58:43 -0400, John wrote: "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." So, I guess you can't read... "over the past 20 years" is quite telling. Who were former oil men? Bush/Cheney. That was quite dishonest, assuming you can read. Here's more. "over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama," Now that's what I call "quite telling". And Obama isn't even an oil man................................yet. obama hasnt been in politics for 20 years. and 71% of oil money goes to the GOP Officially, for federal politics, 1996. But holding a political office of any kind started in 1988 as president of a politial rag at Harvard. Before that in highly political positions in community organizations. So in fact at least 22 years, you are WRONG as usual. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:36:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 4:12 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:58:43 -0400, John wrote: obama hasnt been in politics for 20 years. and 71% of oil money goes to the GOP Officially, for federal politics, 1996. But holding a political office of any kind started in 1988 as president of a politial rag at Harvard. ROFLMAO!!! now the editor of the harvard 'crimson' is more powerful than the president!! HAHAHAHA!!! is there any more proof needed that the right hates obama because he's BLACK?? |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 4:13 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:59:02 -0600, wrote: On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. he brought universal health care Hasn't figured out how to pay for it. a growing GDP Inflation isn't something to brag about. unemployment projected to drop by 5% at the end of the year... Projected? Hey, I project this property I have will one day become beach front. Are you interested? Hell, everything I read says by November USA will be back into a depression/recession dive. if this is failure, i'll take it Too bad you Obamanites couldn't exclude the rest of us from paying for the total idiodic dilusional crap going on. Good part is when your welfare stops so will your internet connection. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 3:37 PM, mmc wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. ---- Bush and Cheney did away with the requirement for the valve that would have stopped the flow at the ocean floor. Saved the oil companies $500k per. But, WTF? Let's blame it on Obama. So do you have a cite for that statement or just more Obamanite bull****? -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
Drill here drill now
On 24/05/2010 4:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about In reality, oil isn't as bad as you think to the environment. It is a naturally occuring substance and often leaks out anyway. Take the oil sands, if not mined out, it might just wash into the arctic. That being said, it isn't good to release that much at once. But unlike plastic bottles, cans, toilets, tires, boats, city garbage that still exists in the gulf 20-70 years after they are dumped, oil will only take a few years to disolve back into the environment. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:42:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 4:13 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:59:02 -0600, wrote: You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. he brought universal health care Hasn't figured out how to pay for it. actually he has. the deficit will be lower with obamacare than it will be without it. a growing GDP Inflation isn't something to brag about. you keep saying inflation is a problem right now it's running at zero percent care to tell us why NO inflation is an inflationary problem? unemployment projected to drop by 5% at the end of the year... Projected? gee. you don't read the news, do you? all you have is your little transistor survival radio and you listen to rush. that's all you need. let's look at reality, shall we? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37303255...s_and_economy/ Economists forecast the pace of U.S. growth to pick up in the year ahead as consumers and businesses alike accelerate spending, according to a new survey. if this is failure, i'll take it Too bad you Obamanites couldn't exclude the rest of us from paying for the total idiodic dilusional crap going on. Good part is when your welfare stops so will your internet connection. hey idiot. you're not even an american citizen. as to who damaged the economy check he http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...the-day-2.html BUSH'S TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH CAUSED THE DEFICIT |
Drill here drill now
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:44:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 3:37 PM, mmc wrote: wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. ---- Bush and Cheney did away with the requirement for the valve that would have stopped the flow at the ocean floor. Saved the oil companies $500k per. But, WTF? Let's blame it on Obama. So do you have a cite for that statement or just more Obamanite bull****? so the racist wants to blame obama...when it's common knowledge the rich white boy cheney DID **** environment: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/arc..._05/023635.php so the right wing sticks its head up its ass and blames the darkie. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com