On 24/05/2010 4:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:36:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 4:08 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400, lil wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:


Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks.

canuck did. he said that cops 'get in the way' so should be
eliminated. he's a typical right winger. they think cops should be
used exclusively for border control and breaking strikes


I see you found your drugs, the illegal ones.

do you deny you said cops 'get in the way' so get killed? if you DO
deny it, i'm more than happy to provide the quote where you said this.

In the context *******ization of your words, yes.

But then the bpuharic black supremacist isn't very rational.

--
I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no
nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach.

On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:26:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 4:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:36:57 -0600,
wrote:


do you deny you said cops 'get in the way' so get killed? if you DO
deny it, i'm more than happy to provide the quote where you said this.

In the context *******ization of your words, yes.

But then the bpuharic black supremacist isn't very rational.

i love it. first he admtis he wants cops dead. THEN he calls those who
are offended by this 'black supremacists'...

the right wing would be proud.