nom=de=plume wrote:

"lil abner" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 May 2010 13:15:08 -0400, lil abner wrote:

Once again the Southern Poverty Law Center and other extremists
want to
label anyone that is faithful to the Constiution and Republic as the
Extremists.

Congrats. You just labeled yourself as a loon.

Actually, he just labeled himself as someone who supports the summary
execution of police officers.

No I do not. I in no way said such a thing.
I merely pointed out that the Southern Poverty Law Center etc seeks to
label anyone that might be in any way opposing their socialism is an
extremist and since the idiots that did that crime are real
extremists, silence opposition as you might me lumped in with their
number.

Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks. You are doing exactly as the People in the
Article are doing: trying to brand everyone that isn't in lock step with
your agenda as an extremist and trying to link them to real extremists.
That is despicable.
Trying to say I or anyone approves, of such atrocities is despicable but
typical of left wing extremists.
There isn't anyone that approves of that trash.
End of this nonsense. So far your the only extremist here.
Are you working for some crazy left wing or even right wingers?

On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400, lil abner wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:


Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks.

canuck did. he said that cops 'get in the way' so should be
eliminated. he's a typical right winger. they think cops should be
used exclusively for border control and breaking strikes

Trying to say I or anyone approves, of such atrocities is despicable but
typical of left wing extremists.

except it's the right that's killing cops

On 24/05/2010 4:08 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400, lil wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:


Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks.

canuck did. he said that cops 'get in the way' so should be
eliminated. he's a typical right winger. they think cops should be
used exclusively for border control and breaking strikes


I see you found your drugs, the illegal ones.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth.

On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:36:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 4:08 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400, lil wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:


Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks.

canuck did. he said that cops 'get in the way' so should be
eliminated. he's a typical right winger. they think cops should be
used exclusively for border control and breaking strikes


I see you found your drugs, the illegal ones.

do you deny you said cops 'get in the way' so get killed? if you DO
deny it, i'm more than happy to provide the quote where you said this.

On 24/05/2010 4:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:36:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 4:08 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400, lil wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:


Basically, you defended someone who murdered police by claiming that the
SPLC identified that person as an extremist.

If you want to be labeled as an extremist, feel free to make threats
against the police or Obama.

N one defended those jerks.

canuck did. he said that cops 'get in the way' so should be
eliminated. he's a typical right winger. they think cops should be
used exclusively for border control and breaking strikes


I see you found your drugs, the illegal ones.

do you deny you said cops 'get in the way' so get killed? if you DO
deny it, i'm more than happy to provide the quote where you said this.

In the context *******ization of your words, yes.

But then the bpuharic black supremacist isn't very rational.

--
I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no
nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach.

On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:26:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 4:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:36:57 -0600,
wrote:


do you deny you said cops 'get in the way' so get killed? if you DO
deny it, i'm more than happy to provide the quote where you said this.

In the context *******ization of your words, yes.

But then the bpuharic black supremacist isn't very rational.

i love it. first he admtis he wants cops dead. THEN he calls those who
are offended by this 'black supremacists'...

the right wing would be proud.