On May 11, 11:57*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On May 10, 3:23*pm, John H wrote:
Warning...some of the memories these photos bring back may bring tears to your
eyes.

http://tinyurl.com/24gh9lr
--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

That third pic.

That's quite a view.

?;^ )

Looks like the view from 1500 feet. That was a common altitude for helicopters
as AK's were not effective against one flying that high.. (At least that's what
I was told.)
--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That guy's wearing the same crappy helmet, and the same crappy
headset. I wonder how effective that .30 carbine from WW2 would be at
1500 ft?

probably more so if you dropped it instead of firing it.

On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On May 11, 11:57*am, John H wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On May 10, 3:23*pm, John H wrote:
Warning...some of the memories these photos bring back may bring tears to your
eyes.

http://tinyurl.com/24gh9lr
--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

That third pic.

That's quite a view.

?;^ )

Looks like the view from 1500 feet. That was a common altitude for helicopters
as AK's were not effective against one flying that high.. (At least that's what
I was told.)
--
John H

For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That guy's wearing the same crappy helmet, and the same crappy
headset. I wonder how effective that .30 carbine from WW2 would be at
1500 ft?

probably more so if you dropped it instead of firing it.

I 'spect it's more effective shooting down than shooting up!

I'm surprised to see the old carbine. I'd paid no attention to his weapon the
first time through. By the time I got there, 1969, the M-16s were the latest
rage.
--
Annoy a Liberal...practice personal responsibility!

John H