On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600,
wrote:



And true. That is why business are not starting up hiring,

guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last
month...the most in years..

But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. They
do not have the cranial capacity to understand it.


biggest spenders in history: conservatives

Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. I don't like the government
adjusted numbers.

Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was
better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. What is that fool think he is
doing? Has not Obama any integrity at all?

And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market
tanked on Thursday. Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self
pity, loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood sucked.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups

to the right wing, 100,000,000 hard working americans are 'screw ups'.

On 09/05/2010 4:34 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46:48 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups

to the right wing, 100,000,000 hard working americans are 'screw ups'.

Majority of them yes, worshiping debt and Obama is not good. Obama is
just the idiot they chose to appease the sheep, keeps them in line.
Hard to believe, but in some ways we see eye to eye, just that you think
Obama is some kind of saviour when he is just another piece in the game
to manage the herd.

Obama was picked as he could sell a good line of bull****.
--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:16:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:34 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46:48 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups

to the right wing, 100,000,000 hard working americans are 'screw ups'.

Majority of them yes, worshiping debt and Obama is not good.

ROFLMAO!! and how did bush treat them? like a baby treats a diaper!
give 8,000,000 of them pink slips. boosted spending more than any
other president in history. spent a TRILLION on a useless war

how'd that work out?

Obama is
just the idiot they chose to appease the sheep, keeps them in line.

uh huh. and what did bush do for them? nothing. you right wingers
think the US economy is failing if unemployment's not at 25%.

bush tortured US citizens. you guys say that's OK. he locked up
americans without trial. right wingers think that'st great

obama is black. that's the ONLY reason you hate him

Hard to believe, but in some ways we see eye to eye, just that you think
Obama is some kind of saviour when he is just another piece in the game
to manage the herd.

i don't think he's a savior. i think he's the least objectionable
choice.


Obama was picked as he could sell a good line of bull****.

and how would palin have worked out? once mccain had a fatal stroke,
you feel palin would have done a fine job defending the rights of
working folks?

she's never done it in her history. but she's defended the rich. to
you that's all that matters

On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if you
were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your pieces to
regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if you
were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your pieces to
regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

On 09/05/2010 6:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if
you were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your
pieces to regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

Yep, especiailly since I am in part a carnivor. Had rib-eye last night.
But I suspect we eagles and lions would leave the hk, pbuharic and
de-fumers for the vultures.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On 5/9/10 10:19 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 6:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self
pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if
you were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your
pieces to regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

Yep, especiailly since I am in part a carnivor. Had rib-eye last night.
But I suspect we eagles and lions would leave the hk, pbuharic and
de-fumers for the vultures.


Eagles and lions? You're a little putz who lives north of the board.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.