![]() |
For you tax wizards...
|
For you tax wizards...
On Sun, 9 May 2010 09:19:00 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On May 9, 8:25*am, Canuck57 wrote: On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote: Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. *I don't like the government adjusted numbers. Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. *What is that fool think he is doing? *Has not Obama any integrity at all? And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market tanked on Thursday. *Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****. -- There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are counting on it. Those of us who would normally be doing stuff that generates jobs are now sitting back (and going to the bahamas) and shaking our heads at the stupidity of those who complain about the lack of jobs. Why should we take chances so they can then punish us for creating jobs? guess he doesn't pay attention to the news. the economy created over 200K jobs last month...the most since 2006 but, no one ever accused the right of paying too much attention to facts No thanks, I'll figure out ways to do stuff without any more workers or simply not do stuff that requires workers. Whoa, triple dip recession due to Obamonomics stupidity. Obama does not care about Americans, he has done nearly nothing a not according to roubini. he sees a U shaped recession...we're out of it and the economy is growing but no one ever accused the right of paying too much attention to facts nd goes golfing while Nashville floods under the greatest disaster TN has had since the Civil war. Economic expansion is now taking place overseas the US economy has been growing at 3.6% for the last 2 quarters...and 5.6 in the quarter preceding those but no one ever accused the right of paying too much attention to facts and those of us who want to do stuff are working with businesses over there, screw the Demomorons. gee. what's happened to the euro vs the dollar? but no one's ever accused the right of paying too much attention to facts |
For you tax wizards...
|
For you tax wizards...
On 09/05/2010 10:19 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 9, 8:25 am, wrote: On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600, wrote: On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600, wrote: And true. That is why business are not starting up hiring, guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last month...the most in years.. But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. They do not have the cranial capacity to understand it. biggest spenders in history: conservatives Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't. your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. I don't like the government adjusted numbers. Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. What is that fool think he is doing? Has not Obama any integrity at all? And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market tanked on Thursday. Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****. -- There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are counting on it. Those of us who would normally be doing stuff that generates jobs are now sitting back (and going to the bahamas) and shaking our heads at the stupidity of those who complain about the lack of jobs. Why should we take chances so they can then punish us for creating jobs? No thanks, I'll figure out ways to do stuff without any more workers or simply not do stuff that requires workers. Whoa, triple dip recession due to Obamonomics stupidity. Obama does not care about Americans, he has done nearly nothing and goes golfing while Nashville floods under the greatest disaster TN has had since the Civil war. Economic expansion is now taking place overseas and those of us who want to do stuff are working with businesses over there, screw the Demomorons. You got it. But it isn't just Democriters, it is a social attitude of entitlement, self pity and irrational loser mentality. The win-loose philosophy. Really self destructive envy and greed. I am 2 cents to packing it in and calling it a day with this economy. Going home shopping in Costa Rica and Panama at some point, and if I find a place we like, we will liquidate and move. Let the losers fund their own nonsense until they smarten up. And if they wake up, which isn't likely I can invest from abroad at a lower tax rate. -- There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are counting on it. |
For you tax wizards...
BAR wrote:
In article , says... Fairly competent resources are available off-shore for 1/4 to 1/3 the cost of US resources without all of the bagage of hiring a US resource. In fact you can hire 2 for 1 US worker and not still be ahead if the productivity is only 50% each. Correction "2 for 1 US worker and still be ahead" Plain stupid thinking. Those working will have to support those not working. Or get their throats cut. Is that what you mean by "a head?" You sound like a commie. In America we want everybody working. Your "foreigner first" attitude don't fly. Jim - The end result of Libertarianism is Communism. The Libertarian leadership become the apparatchiks. These closet commies ain't fooling anybody. That's why they never get anywhere in America. They don't have American values. They're commie faggots. The GOP knows this. Even the queer Demoncrats know it. |
For you tax wizards...
On 09/05/2010 11:02 AM, Jim wrote:
BAR wrote: In article , says... Fairly competent resources are available off-shore for 1/4 to 1/3 the cost of US resources without all of the bagage of hiring a US resource. In fact you can hire 2 for 1 US worker and not still be ahead if the productivity is only 50% each. Correction "2 for 1 US worker and still be ahead" Plain stupid thinking. Those working will have to support those not working. Or get their throats cut. Is that what you mean by "a head?" You sound like a commie. In America we want everybody working. Your "foreigner first" attitude don't fly. That is why it is a depression. Fewer people supporting the increasing dead weight and more corruption too. A loose-loose situation. Why even get involved? You would have to be nuts to open a new business in the US/Canada that could be done offshore where win-win is possible. Jim - The end result of Libertarianism is Communism. The Libertarian leadership become the apparatchiks. These closet commies ain't fooling anybody. That's why they never get anywhere in America. They don't have American values. They're commie faggots. The GOP knows this. Even the queer Demoncrats know it. Huh? Libertarianism is about less government, less interferance, more choices and opportunities for the people will to get off their asses, state owns squat. How does that equate with communism? -- There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are counting on it. |
For you tax wizards...
In article , says...
BAR wrote: In article , says... Fairly competent resources are available off-shore for 1/4 to 1/3 the cost of US resources without all of the bagage of hiring a US resource. In fact you can hire 2 for 1 US worker and not still be ahead if the productivity is only 50% each. Correction "2 for 1 US worker and still be ahead" Plain stupid thinking. Those working will have to support those not working. Or get their throats cut. Is that what you mean by "a head?" You sound like a commie. In America we want everybody working. Your "foreigner first" attitude don't fly. It is called business. And, the decisions are made to keep the stock price of US based corporations rising to make them attractive to the large institutional investors (i.e. pension funds). If I am lucky enough to get 75% out of the two off-shore resources for 2/3'rds the cost of a single on-shore resource then I am way ahead of the game. By duty is to the share holders, not the government. If I had the ability to abolish entitlements at the federal level I would do it tomorrow. There is no reason that the federal government should be passing out social security checks, paying for medical benefits or other entitlements. The only thing you are entitled to do in life is to die, everything else is optional. Jim - The end result of Libertarianism is Communism. The Libertarian leadership become the apparatchiks. These closet commies ain't fooling anybody. That's why they never get anywhere in America. They don't have American values. They're commie faggots. The GOP knows this. Even the queer Demoncrats know it. Libertarians arguments fall apart as soon as they step off of their property. |
For you tax wizards...
On 09/05/2010 10:28 AM, bpuharic wrote:
guess he doesn't pay attention to the news. the economy created over 200K jobs last month...the most since 2006 So Obama looses even more jobs than were created, and those created were low wage jobs often without benefits. LMAO, I can't believe you are this stupid, but don't doubt it. Lets look at the data: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm Unemployment went from 9.7 to 9.9. Funny how even the adjusted BS number goes up and you and Obama imply it went down. Second issue is Obama didn't create any jobs, businesses did. Probalby with EI run out, get them back cheap. I see those unemployed for more than 27 weeks is at a new all time high. No good news there. I see 195,000 re-enter the work force, guess more couples are working more jobs to make up for lower wages. Not good. 2.1 to 2.4 million part timers, hell, those jobs are not enough to live on. Must be with new lower paying jobs, they need the second part time job to make ends meet and it squeezes up the student unemployment to 25.5%. No good news here. Pretty small gains in manufacturing. Almost not worth a mention. Not really good news here as at this time of year it should be much better. Only 14,000 for construction? Whippy do. At that rate it will take 40 years to compensate for what happened last year at this time. I might not live that long. A grain of small news, 66,000 hired by the government part time. Charge it to future debt will ya. Drilling in a bit I see full time worker unemployment has increased at a time I would expect it to decrease. No wonder the market went nuts on Thursday. I would pay big bucks to see this a few hours earlier...as I am sure some did. Computer glitch my ass.... Obamanomics is a dismal failure of giagantic proportions. 100% democratic liberal loser mentality f--kup. You should want to fire them all. If they worked for me, they would be so fired as what they cot they should be able to do better. -- There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are counting on it. |
For you tax wizards...
On Sun, 09 May 2010 10:51:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 09/05/2010 10:23 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:17:07 -0600, wrote: On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600, wrote: your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on Actually, i would like unemployment to be 3% except, of course, the economic policies you push would drive unemployment to 25%. Mine have never been tried, the closest would be Reaganomics sure they were tried. in 29 they let the banks fail, as you desire. it drove unemployment to 25% .. It would differ in that I would downsize 1/3rd of the governemnt to match as not to increase debt by too much. govt represents 20% of GDP. cutting 1/3 of that would drop the GDP by 7%....which is about the amount of GDP drop that led to the current depression so you're saying you'd cause a depression to cure a depression? yep. that sounds very right wing. I would stop the Afganistan/Iraq issue ASAP that's because you're a coward. the iraq war is useless. but you're a coward and think only of money so dont even appreciate the heroic sacrifice CANADIANS are making against fascist imperialist aggression in afghanistan In 2 years, the USA will become the hottest growing economy going. really? when the GDP drops 7%...like it just did...that led to a depression what we need are tax cuts for the middle class. that's something not a single right winger has proposed we need a tax increase on the wealthy...another thing the right opposes Instead of wasting trillions on GM, banks and losers, I would put some towards nuclear power plants employing people across the nation equally and have something to show for it. And it would cost a fraction fo the bailoouts. why? oil represents 8% of power generation. and building nukes would take 20 years. You wouldn't see me shooting off my mouth too much, as I would be a man of action and not big mouth bull****. I would gve your results and not gums a flapping. what i notice is that you ignore the problem. we need to regulate wall street. you ignore wall street because of the rich. we need to regulate financial instruments. you ignore them you ignore the problem...the real problem. the fact is, until wall street greed caused the economic collapse, govt spending was not a huge problem. the real problem is the collapse in middel class spending caused by the rich stealing the wealth of the middle class you whine, bitch and moan about the darkie in the white house. you blame main street for the collapse your whole philosophy is right wing...which is why it's a failure Saddly some misguided ones are. But I am a conservative-libertarian. And I believe in peoples rights to seek out prosperity. If they get off their asses, it is up to them. A president first and formost needs to preserve what made America great. And that isn't jive talk bull**** we get today. more right wing bull****. the problem is NOT a lazy middle class. americans already work more than any other people on earth in industrialized countries you right whiners want us to be slaves Obamanomics is a bust, an utter failure you mean because the economy is growing? strange definition of failure you have. guess you forgot that bush spent us into a depression and spent a trillion on a useless war Proof it isn't inflation? Funny, I see no jobs, increasing taxes and stagnent wages. Some types of bankruptcies are at an all time high. you see no jobs? guess you dont follow the news. for the first time since 2006 the economy added jobs. and stagnant wages?? IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOR 10 YEARS! a whole DECADE when the middle class had NO increase in wages while the richest 1% had a THREE HUNDRED PERCENT INCREASE in income. yet you say NOTHING about that. you right whiners...you focus on the bull****, penalize the middle class, insulate the rich from their mistakes THEN BITCH BITCH BITCH about the LAZY MIDDLE CLASS all you do is BITCH BITCH BITCH . Sad joke on Americans. DC corruption gone mad. Obama has almost already spent about what Reagan and Bush spent in 16 years but did it in 2! guess you don't know what happens during a depression, do you? figures. right whiners value ideology over facts I have read all about 1929 to 1939. That is why I know it isn't going to end soon. Statism and liberal selfish *******s need to learn the basic leasons first. And only now are some waking up to smell, better get the government in fiscal order or Greece will infect NY. like i said. you have NO idea what happens during a depression hey idiot...do me a favor tell me when in the last 80 years the govt ran a surplus during a depression, OK otherwise just stop pumping out the fairy tale right wing bull**** Huh? Do you subscribe to bull**** economics? Employment always gets better in 30-60 days. Maybe 4 months if it is like Intel still selling chips out of production for 8 months, but it is rare. Employment is real recovery. really? it takes a full YEAR of economic growth at 5% to reduce unemployment by 1% but you're so full of right wing bull**** you think rush limball is a hero |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com