Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 9:40*am, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote: That's because there is no answer, moron. Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could just make a phone call, without any identification, and get information like that, how many times do you think there would be lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied. That's the answer. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oliver Hazard Perry- Newport RI | Tall Ship Photos | |||
When is a fuel spill not a hazard? | General | |||
Old boating hazard getting new attention in Florida | General | |||
Potential hazard on the Barle | UK Paddle | |||
OT Stuffed toy hazard? How about 'down' jackets? | Boat Building |