On 4/27/10 3:34 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/27/10 3:22 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400,
wrote:

Bye, bye Wal-Mart.

Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.


My assumption assumes several possibilities:

A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.



er, shops, not shows.




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.