Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default The Walton Women...

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400, hk
wrote:

Bye, bye Wal-Mart.


Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
hk hk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,531
Default The Walton Women...

On 4/27/10 3:22 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400,
wrote:

Bye, bye Wal-Mart.


Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.



My assumption assumes several possibilities:

A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
hk hk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,531
Default The Walton Women...

On 4/27/10 3:34 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/27/10 3:22 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400,
wrote:

Bye, bye Wal-Mart.


Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.



My assumption assumes several possibilities:

A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.



er, shops, not shows.




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default The Walton Women...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk
wrote:

Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.



My assumption assumes several possibilities:

A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.


There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The
asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle
on it.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
hk hk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,531
Default The Walton Women...

On 4/27/10 3:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400,
wrote:

Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?

It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.



My assumption assumes several possibilities:

A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.


There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The
asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle
on it.



Well, I am assuming Wal-Mart will buy the verdict, but there is always
hope. So far, apparently all there is is a path to a class action suit.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
Default The Walton Women...

On Apr 27, 3:43*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk
wrote:

Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? *Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?


It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.


My assumption assumes several possibilities:


A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.


There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The
asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. *I wouldn't bet a nickle
on it.


It's a class action lawsuit. Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers
will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to...
wait for it... Walmart.

Or it gets tossed.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,267
Default The Walton Women...

On Apr 27, 4:55*pm, Jack wrote:
On Apr 27, 3:43*pm, Wayne.B wrote:







On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk
wrote:


Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? *Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?


It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.


My assumption assumes several possibilities:


A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.


There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The
asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. *I wouldn't bet a nickle
on it.


It's a class action lawsuit. *Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers
will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to...
wait for it... Walmart.

Or it gets tossed.


Gee, I dont know about that. my Daughter (while 7 mths pregnant)
slipped on an "un posted" just rinsed floor at our Walmart. She got a
Gift Card for $200.00 . She also had to sign a " No Reproach " form as
well.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
hk hk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,531
Default The Walton Women...

On 4/27/10 5:21 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Apr 27, 4:55 pm, wrote:
On Apr 27, 3:43 pm, wrote:







On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400,
wrote:


Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be,
how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business,
thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the
unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your
warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs?


It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices.


My assumption assumes several possibilities:


A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed
assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge
judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize
Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere.


There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The
asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle
on it.


It's a class action lawsuit. Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers
will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to...
wait for it... Walmart.

Or it gets tossed.


Gee, I dont know about that. my Daughter (while 7 mths pregnant)
slipped on an "un posted" just rinsed floor at our Walmart. She got a
Gift Card for $200.00 . She also had to sign a " No Reproach " form as
well.



She let them off lightly.


--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Living Aboard in the general area of Ft. Walton Beach - Destin Florida area Rick B. Cruising 1 February 12th 07 01:33 AM
Bloody women Steve Leyland ASA 3 November 15th 05 07:04 PM
Horvath's women (was pic of LP) Joe ASA 10 December 14th 04 01:10 AM
( OT ) Men vs women Jim General 0 August 29th 04 05:51 PM
florid ,fort walton berth? tom ASA 0 August 22nd 03 03:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017