Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400, hk
wrote: Bye, bye Wal-Mart. Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/10 3:22 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400, wrote: Bye, bye Wal-Mart. Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/10 3:34 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/27/10 3:22 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:52 -0400, wrote: Bye, bye Wal-Mart. Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. er, shops, not shows. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk
wrote: Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle on it. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/10 3:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, wrote: Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle on it. Well, I am assuming Wal-Mart will buy the verdict, but there is always hope. So far, apparently all there is is a path to a class action suit. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 27, 3:43*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk wrote: Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? *Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. *I wouldn't bet a nickle on it. It's a class action lawsuit. Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to... wait for it... Walmart. Or it gets tossed. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 27, 4:55*pm, Jack wrote:
On Apr 27, 3:43*pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, hk wrote: Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? *Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. *I wouldn't bet a nickle on it. It's a class action lawsuit. *Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to... wait for it... Walmart. Or it gets tossed. Gee, I dont know about that. my Daughter (while 7 mths pregnant) slipped on an "un posted" just rinsed floor at our Walmart. She got a Gift Card for $200.00 . She also had to sign a " No Reproach " form as well. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/10 5:21 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Apr 27, 4:55 pm, wrote: On Apr 27, 3:43 pm, wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:34:15 -0400, wrote: Harold, as the self professed great humanitarian that you claim to be, how could you take any pleasure in Wal-mart going out of business, thus putting hundreds of thousands of hard working people out on the unemployment line? Is it because they may be non-union, and in your warped view of the world, don't deserve to have jobs? It's not like the Wal-mart employees have a lot of choices. My assumption assumes several possibilities: A more worker-friendly company may bid on wal-mart's stores and fixed assets after the chain goes belly-up because it cannot satisfy a huge judgment, and, if Wal-Mart goes belly-up, the event alone may revitalize Main Street and smaller shows in communities everywhere. There is a third assumption that is even more unlikely: The asssumption that Wal-Mart will lose the suit. I wouldn't bet a nickle on it. It's a class action lawsuit. Walmart will settle, the sleazy lawyers will get rich, and the plaintiffs will each get a $15 gift card to... wait for it... Walmart. Or it gets tossed. Gee, I dont know about that. my Daughter (while 7 mths pregnant) slipped on an "un posted" just rinsed floor at our Walmart. She got a Gift Card for $200.00 . She also had to sign a " No Reproach " form as well. She let them off lightly. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Living Aboard in the general area of Ft. Walton Beach - Destin Florida area | Cruising | |||
Bloody women | ASA | |||
Horvath's women (was pic of LP) | ASA | |||
( OT ) Men vs women | General | |||
florid ,fort walton berth? | ASA |