On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again. Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being stupid. You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years." There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?

"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again. Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?

On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again. Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like
bugs or weeds either.

"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president
for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again.
Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being
stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like bugs
or weeds either.


If you don't like bugs or weeds, I'd suggest hiring pest control and a
gardener.

On 4/29/2010 3:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president
for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again.
Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being
stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like bugs
or weeds either.


If you don't like bugs or weeds, I'd suggest hiring pest control and a
gardener.


What for? I'm not helpless like Hairy, you know.

"blank" wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 3:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right
now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's
still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his
depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president
for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as
written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again.
Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being
stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If
I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like
bugs
or weeds either.


If you don't like bugs or weeds, I'd suggest hiring pest control and a
gardener.


What for? I'm not helpless like Hairy, you know.


Blank = anon-e-moose ??

On 4/29/2010 10:59 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 3:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am, wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,
wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right
now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is 6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's
still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his
depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been president
for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as
written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again.
Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being
stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If
I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like
bugs
or weeds either.


If you don't like bugs or weeds, I'd suggest hiring pest control and a
gardener.


What for? I'm not helpless like Hairy, you know.


Blank = anon-e-moose ??


Do ya think? You're a genius, not.
What a pitiful urchin you are.

"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 10:59 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 3:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 11:53 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 4/29/2010 1:26 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:16 am,
wrote:
"Bill wrote in message

...





wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:50:57 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:12:51 -0400,

wrote:

The Dow was 1000 in 1980. It is flirting with 11,000 right
now.

thanks to obama,

Sure, if you are willing to blame him the next time it is
6000

if something he did has an effect, sure. but right now it's
still
bush's depression

Nope, Obama has been in control for 2 years. Is now his
depression.

Two years?? I guess April really means January in gibberish.

--
Nom=de=Plume

To you, D'Plume, it probably does.


You're just as much an idiot if you think Obama has been
president
for
two years. Well, back to ignoring your posts...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope he is in his 2nd year. And the Financial Reform bill as
written
sucks. Basically does not break up the the Too Big to Fail banks.
Provides a $50 billion bailout fund if they go ape**** again.
Protects
Wall Street from harm. Bad bill.



As usual, you change your tune when you're caught lying or being
stupid.
You
didn't say in his second year. You said, "in control for two
years."
There's
a big difference. And, yes, you're an idiot.


If he's such an idiot, why are you talking at him?


Sometimes I volunteer to feed the homeless. I believe in charity. If
I'm
such a terrible person, why are you bothering with me?


Because you are a terrible person. I can't help myself. I don't like
bugs
or weeds either.


If you don't like bugs or weeds, I'd suggest hiring pest control and a
gardener.


What for? I'm not helpless like Hairy, you know.


Blank = anon-e-moose ??


Do ya think? You're a genius, not.
What a pitiful urchin you are.


You're a stalker. Keep replying to every post I make if it makes you feel
like more of a man. You are a man, right? Because it's hard to tell.

In article ,
says...

On 4/25/10 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:47:49 -0400,
wrote:

I agree that here is certainly a casino aspect to Wall Street
but if you play the game and lose you can't immediately assume the
game must be crooked. For every loser there is a winner. In this case
it was the people who shorted the housing market. The liberal hero
George Soros made a ****load of money in this crash and took an
inordinate amount of TARP money from his AIG positions.

Your post assumes a modicum of honesty on the part of those who control
Wall Street. Ha! The game is crooked.

It all depends on what you mean by "honest".
If you are saying honest means your books are in order and the
transactions are somewhat transparent then they are mostly honest.
There are plenty of swarmy things going on that are legal and
"honest". That doesn't necessarily mean they are moral or ethical.



I don't trust the books, the outside bookkeepers, the brokerage houses,
or the bankers. In the good old days, you could trust the outside
certified auditors to reasonably and fairly present the books of a large
corporation. These days, there's not much difference between the crooks
who rob you with a six gun and the ones who rob you with a fountain
pen/computer keyboard.

Just like the mob robbing union pension funds.

On 5/1/10 10:04 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleu5SdnenQD8nkQEnWnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 4/25/10 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:47:49 -0400,
wrote:

I agree that here is certainly a casino aspect to Wall Street
but if you play the game and lose you can't immediately assume the
game must be crooked. For every loser there is a winner. In this case
it was the people who shorted the housing market. The liberal hero
George Soros made a ****load of money in this crash and took an
inordinate amount of TARP money from his AIG positions.

Your post assumes a modicum of honesty on the part of those who control
Wall Street. Ha! The game is crooked.

It all depends on what you mean by "honest".
If you are saying honest means your books are in order and the
transactions are somewhat transparent then they are mostly honest.
There are plenty of swarmy things going on that are legal and
"honest". That doesn't necessarily mean they are moral or ethical.



I don't trust the books, the outside bookkeepers, the brokerage houses,
or the bankers. In the good old days, you could trust the outside
certified auditors to reasonably and fairly present the books of a large
corporation. These days, there's not much difference between the crooks
who rob you with a six gun and the ones who rob you with a fountain
pen/computer keyboard.

Just like the mob robbing union pension funds.



Sorry, Bertbrain, but i'm not aware of any recent cases of "the mob"
robbing union pension funds, other than, of course, your wall street "mob"

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.