On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:37:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:46:53 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



unemployment reached its peak at 10.7%. it's now 9.7%. a 1% drop in
10% unemployment is TEN PERCENT

you are SUCH an IDIOT!!

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

and long term unemployment? those are the folks who are still looking
for work and havent given up.

why havent they given up? because obama's economic policies have kept
them in the searching mode, vs giving up.

thanks. i already knew that. in fact, i predicted unemployment may
start to rise as those who've actually given up re-enter the search
mode, looking for work

thanks to obama's policies.

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

Just more bpuharic / Obama BS...

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under
obama...

but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean
dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management.

guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting
interest rates, and the money supply

oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he
lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity.

Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006
congress.

but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless


And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the
job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops

you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under
obama...

but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean
dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management.

guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting
interest rates, and the money supply

oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he
lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity.

Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006
congress.

but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless


And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the
job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops

you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:18:37 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

which is like blaming lincoln for the civil war.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:18:37 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for
5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

which is like blaming lincoln for the civil war.



Nope, you blame Bush for 9/11. Can not have it both ways.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up
with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush did
pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty
big time.

And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment
benefits.

Just more bpuharic / Obama BS...

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

The dip is probably real. Those thousands hired temporarily for the CENSUS.