On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:17:14 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/04/2010 6:28 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts

Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

On 24/04/2010 4:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:17:14 -0600,
wrote:

On 23/04/2010 6:28 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts

Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. It isn't
attracted to those that money managements them.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:36 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 4:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:


Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

On 24/04/2010 8:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 4:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:


Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

Yep.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

In article ,
says...

On 24/04/2010 8:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 4:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:


Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

Yep.

Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your
assest? Neither would I.

On 4/24/10 12:02 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =


Yep.

Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your
assest? Neither would I.




"Money is attracted to those that know how to management money."

"Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your assest?"

D'oh.



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:02:55 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...


Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

Yep.

Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your
assest? Neither would I.

the right asked the best thieves on wall street to manage the economy.

canuck believes they're gods

On 24/04/2010 11:13 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:02:55 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...


Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

Yep.

Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your
assest? Neither would I.

the right asked the best thieves on wall street to manage the economy.

canuck believes they're gods

Not gods. Just recognize that you can't fight the NWO of corruption, so
you anticipate it for profit. If you figure Obama is a statist, and I
firmly believe he is, then big taxing government will ensue. Factor in
the economic debt war, religious war, and a few other things, you try to
stay one step ahead of the pack and profit.

Like playing a game of chess. I got out of banks, loans, mortgage
mutuals and the like between 2004 and 2007 as the writing was on the
wall. Before the big wipeout.

Look at Obama, he is going after the middle class, not the ultra rich or
corrupt. Hell, he represents the corrupt, hand picked for your
consumption. He knows he can't tax them, even if he could it wouldn't
fund him for long. He needs serious cash for his NWO fantasy. And that
means screwing taxing right onto everyone. It is the motivation behind
health care, revenue.

Take Bilderberg group. Have to keep the anglo-American-European super
rich happy club. These are the people who monitarily back your
presidents and congress people. They get what they want because the
public is gulliable.

Obama puts on a good show, but in reality he is a puppet pawn in the
game. Too spinless to come clean, after all he might end up like JFK.
Nothing in DC has changed, just the big mouth behind the mic. Good liar.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On 24/04/2010 10:02 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 24/04/2010 8:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 4:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:


Actually, I agree. GM is peanuts really. What is $200 billion in
defunct debt and bailouts to $14.5 trillion anyways?

At some point government is going to have to downsize to at least 1/2 of
what it is today, maybe less. Even if they pull off hyper-stagflation,
without the middle class incomes following or exceeding the inflation,
recovery of the debt spiral is not possible. In fact, it will get worse
as governemnt costs go up but the revenue does not. Real bad situation
to be in.

gee. we managed it in ww2. your complaint is that the middle class
isnt suffering enough. you're happy with the fact the rich are rich.
you just h ate the middle class

Money is attracted to those that know how to management money. =

more right wing fairy tale bull****. you really believe this stuff,
dont you?

Yep.

Would you ask a poor persoon how to manage your how to manage your
assest? Neither would I.

Nope. Would not let them do your or my portfolio. Even if I let them
do yours, you might kill me for the results.

But I do believe money is attracted to those that know how to management
it properly. Trouble is money manages most people.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.