![]() |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On 25/04/2010 3:36 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:46:53 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: http://www.bls.gov/ the US bureau of labor statistics unemployment reached its peak at 10.7%. it's now 9.7%. a 1% drop in 10% unemployment is TEN PERCENT you are SUCH an IDIOT!! Me an idiot? You are frigging immensely stupid. You said Obama had reduced unemployment 10% since he came in to office. Let me show you your quote "the FACT is unemployment has dropped by 10% since Obama took office. " It dropped 10% from the highest it was since he came in to office and it may just be a small perturbation from the census worker hiring. He pushed for the stimulus to keep unemployment under 8%. IT went from 10.7 to 9.7% last month. He has gone up since he took over office. Gone up lots. In Feb. 2008 was 5.2%. guess being right wing prevents you from reading. unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now, due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10% whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools? What am I missing? 10% - 9.7% = 1%. Not 10%. Trouble with you brain farts is you are mostly wrong, and never admit it. ..... hahahaha... And lets take a look at a real chart: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD When Obama took office it was about 6.9% to 7.7%. Funny how it peeked 10 months after Bush left office. Take your bull**** elsewhere. -- Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:29:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/04/2010 3:36 PM, bpuharic wrote: unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now, due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10% whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools? What am I missing? 10% - 9.7% = 1%. Not 10%. hey genius. whatsamatter? dont they teach math at right wing mental institutions? 1/10 is 10% hell. you cant even do simple math. Trouble with you brain farts is you are mostly wrong, and never admit it. .... hahahaha... And lets take a look at a real chart: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD When Obama took office it was about 6.9% to 7.7%. Funny how it peeked 10 months after Bush left office. yep. we have...or had...a 14 trillion dollar economy. it took a long time for bush's disaster to be rescued by obama Take your bull**** elsewhere. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:
For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%. so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i already knew that Nope: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty big time. And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment benefits. Just more bpuharic / Obama BS... -- Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote: For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%. so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i already knew that Nope: guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under obama... but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting interest rates, and the money supply oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity. Bush did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty big time. and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006 congress. but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment benefits. except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops you really are an economic cripple, aren't you? |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
"hk" wrote in message m... On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: Nom=de=Plume We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has kicked up the spending 2-3x. for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400 US troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to the middle class? nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears. did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years. what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have seen their incomes triple. They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault? yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free market hole we've dug ourselves into. How about cutting spending to GM. peanuts Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of money is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people, spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education. Explain how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached record unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses are in inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from the last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more biased and not as smart as Rush. This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts" aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts. Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot. -- Nom=de=Plume If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not some Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with all the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for laziness. You're an idiot. I'm talking to you. -- Nom=de=Plume If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you. You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as dumb as a shoe. You are so biased, your opinions do not count. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:46:53 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: http://www.bls.gov/ the US bureau of labor statistics unemployment reached its peak at 10.7%. it's now 9.7%. a 1% drop in 10% unemployment is TEN PERCENT you are SUCH an IDIOT!! Me an idiot? You are frigging immensely stupid. You said Obama had reduced unemployment 10% since he came in to office. Let me show you your quote "the FACT is unemployment has dropped by 10% since Obama took office. " It dropped 10% from the highest it was since he came in to office and it may just be a small perturbation from the census worker hiring. He pushed for the stimulus to keep unemployment under 8%. IT went from 10.7 to 9.7% last month. He has gone up since he took over office. Gone up lots. In Feb. 2008 was 5.2%. guess being right wing prevents you from reading. unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now, due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10% whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools? Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With real government numbers. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote: For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%. so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i already knew that Nope: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty big time. And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment benefits. Just more bpuharic / Obama BS... -- Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it. The dip is probably real. Those thousands hired temporarily for the CENSUS. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote: For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%. so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i already knew that Nope: guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under obama... but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting interest rates, and the money supply oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity. Bush did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty big time. and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006 congress. but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment benefits. except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops you really are an economic cripple, aren't you? Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5 points of gain. Happened on his watch. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: guess being right wing prevents you from reading. unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now, due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10% whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools? Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With real government numbers. show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current economic crisis. |
Boats and Obama/Democrat Tax grab
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:18:37 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: you really are an economic cripple, aren't you? Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5 points of gain. Happened on his watch. which is like blaming lincoln for the civil war. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com