Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:34:35 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: new poll has the results; no surprise http://www.salon.com/news/politics/b...12_perspective Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy. The Salon? It's may as well be The Onion. IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, Larry
wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:34:35 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: new poll has the results; no surprise http://www.salon.com/news/politics/b...12_perspective Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy. The Salon? It's may as well be The Onion. IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:34:35 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: new poll has the results; no surprise http://www.salon.com/news/politics/b...12_perspective Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy. The Salon? It's may as well be The Onion. IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. Really? How often are they racists? Got a cite for that one? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, Larry
wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. Really? How often are they racists? Got a cite for that one? did you read the OP? no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"bpuharic" wrote in message
... On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, Larry wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. Really? How often are they racists? Got a cite for that one? did you read the OP? no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. Do you seriously think they actually read?? I'm sorry, but the concept of that actually happening... I can't quite get my head around it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/18/10 1:51 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. Really? How often are they racists? Got a cite for that one? did you read the OP? no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. Do you seriously think they actually read?? I'm sorry, but the concept of that actually happening... I can't quite get my head around it. As my sig says, below, the teabaggers are just the Republican base, calling themselves something different. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:51:18 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, Larry wrote: did you read the OP? no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. Do you seriously think they actually read?? I'm sorry, but the concept of that actually happening... I can't quite get my head around it. i know...i know...i just never lose hope in common sense...but i'm always disappointed. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: IOW you don't like the facts so.... IOW they aren't facts so... like i said, you don't like the facts the teabagger supports are often racists. Really? How often are they racists? Got a cite for that one? did you read the OP? no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. salon.com? How about a real news source? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:54:55 -0400, Larry
wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. salon.com? How about a real news source? if i really wanted to make a joke, i'd say fox news..... but im not that cynical |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:54:55 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:35:17 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:20:11 -0400, wrote: no. you didn't. there's a theory going around right now about 'epistemic closure' on the part of the right. you guys don't read anything but right wing news sources. and you dont even read the original posts. salon.com? How about a real news source? if i really wanted to make a joke, i'd say fox news..... but im not that cynical So salon is the best you've got? I did read the original posts, BTW, and that is what led us here. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bachmann and Palin teabag! | General | |||
list of supporters | ASA | |||
For You W Supporters | General | |||
O.T. CHALLENGE TO THE BUSH SUPPORTERS | General | |||
Stupid Bush Supporters | ASA |