![]() |
OT health care
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article m, says... Odd, how the government is basically dumping NASA saying private industry can do it better and cheaper. But government can do healthcare better and cheaper. Just seems odd. All NASA does these days is administer contracts. The current shuttle design Most of the government just administers contracts. Government contracting is a big industry in the Washington DC area. You can't walk through Arlington, Crystal City, Tysons Corner, Reston or Herndon without tripping over an 8A firm or other firm that is surviving on Government contracts. Halliburton, KBR, Northrup Grumman, etc, etc, etc, . Those 8As are in good? company. |
OT health care
|
OT health care
|
OT health care
|
OT health care
|
OT health care
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:50:31 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:16:47 -0400, bpuharic wrote: obama care will reduce costs, cover everybody, reduce mortality, How will that happen? He did absolutely nothing to reduce costs. The drug industry is unfettered, the medical conglomerates were not touched and the insurance companies just got 15 million new customers at the point of a government gun with no meaningful restriction of what they could charge them. You forgot about no changes to tort reform. Obama wouldn't want to harm his brothers and sisters in the Trial Lawyers Assn. Torts are a minor cost in healthcare. the right thinks of this as a boogeyman, but it shows how morally bankrupt the right wing is |
OT health care
|
OT health care
On 4/18/10 1:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:04:35 -0400, wrote: On 4/18/10 11:54 AM, wrote: On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:16:47 -0400, wrote: obama care will reduce costs, cover everybody, reduce mortality, How will that happen? He did absolutely nothing to reduce costs. The drug industry is unfettered, the medical conglomerates were not touched and the insurance companies just got 15 million new customers at the point of a government gun with no meaningful restriction of what they could charge them. You seem to think what was recently passed is the be-all and end-all. It isn't. To the contrary, I doubt it was much more than a symbolic victory for the Democrats. If anything it is part of a long term plan to destroy the insurance industry and substitute that public plan the democrats want. The only problem with that idea is we would then have to bail out insurance company workers. Nobody really wants to cut into 17% of the economy, no matter how hard they rail against it. I am entirely in favor of destroying the health insurance industry, and replacing it with a system whose primary consideration is the best outcome for patients. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
OT health care
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com