Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/16/10 11:48 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
OK, sometimes I am a slow learner or maybe just too stubborn but after many years of sailing, I realized a sailboat just was not going to get me to many interesting places in a timely fashion. Then I read about the Tolman Skiffs and the amazing voyages some have taken in them and how seaworthy they are and how fuel efficient they are and thought "That's the boat I need". Although I had never even been at the helm of a power boat, I figgered I'd learn. Not knowing anything about characteristics of powerboats did not stop me and neither did the fact that the motor I bought on e-bay came without any wiring instructions or controls didn't either. All in all, the 20' Tolman is a good boat being rugged, seaworthy, very fuel efficient (5 mpg at 20 kts with 2 cycle 90 hp, top speed of 30 kts with 6 people aboard) and I am proud of her. However, her fuel efficiency and planing at 9 kts means she has small deadrise at the transom, 9 degrees which radically increases toward the bow. In 2' chop, at anything over 12 kts, she pounds enough to be uncomfy after about a half hour. Also being so lightweight, about half the weight of the same size fiberglass boat, she can get pushed around by seas easily. This means I am hesitant to take her across the Gulf Stream to the Bahamas or to Dry Tortugas and other things I'd like to do. However, the family likes her because we can use her for pulling the tube behind and scalloping in shallow water etc. There is a 23' Tolman design with a full cabin and much greater deadrise that is still fuel efficient. It would use a 125 hp 4 stroke and get similar MPG. Would a boat this much bigger be as much "fun"? I won't comment on the "fun" quotient, but I will comment on the "deadrise" quotient. I used to own a 25' Parker, a heavy boat (7000 pounds, wet) with 16 degrees of deadrise at the transom with, obviously, a much sharper forefoot at the bow. We frequently have a 2' chop in Chesapeake Bay. Well, the Parker was up to the challenge at planing speeds in that chop, but because of the far forward seating positing in the cabin, I kept the speeds at 20 mph or less in hard chop. Now if I moved to the rear steering position, the chop was hardly noticeable because at that part of the boat, the hull did not really leave the water. My new Parker has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and in my opinion does a better job in the chop. If I were building a new boat in the size you are considering, I'd avoid a hard-chined boat like the Tolman, and find a hull with round chines. They slide back into the water much more gently. Ohhh...a 125 hp outboard would not be enough power for that boat, in my opinion. My 150 Yamaha is a really good match for my 21' Parker...and you are talking a bigger boat with less power. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who is the bigger... | General | |||
The bigger the boat, the bigger the mess | General | |||
Bigger is stupider! | Cruising | |||
A bigger demonstration! OT | General | |||
Bigger than Clinton!!!!!! | ASA |