On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 15, 5:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote:




guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.

NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing
that lefties always do.

nice circular argument. typical of the right

did hitler nationalize businesses? nope.

did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep.

did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up
in concentration camps

to the right this proves he was a leftist.

Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a
dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All
equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom.

fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, bpuharic wrote:




guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.

NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing
that lefties always do.

nice circular argument. typical of the right

did hitler nationalize businesses? nope.

did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep.

did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up
in concentration camps

to the right this proves he was a leftist.

Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a
dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All
equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom.

fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist


Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx. Was the most
successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members
lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR.

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:46:54 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, bpuharic wrote:

did hitler nationalize businesses? nope.

did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep.

did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up
in concentration camps

to the right this proves he was a leftist.

Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a
dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All
equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom.

fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist


Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx.

blah blah blah...a communist is someone who calls himself a communist


Was the most
successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members
lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR.

yeah and 'christianity' has never been tried either

blah blah blah

On 4/16/10 6:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:46:54 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote:

did hitler nationalize businesses? nope.

did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep.

did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up
in concentration camps

to the right this proves he was a leftist.

Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a
dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All
equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom.

fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist


Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx.

blah blah blah...a communist is someone who calls himself a communist


Was the most
successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members
lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR.

yeah and 'christianity' has never been tried either

blah blah blah





Many righties suffer from a rigid personality disorder in themselves, in
what they believe, and in how they think the world should be.

The soviets adapted "communism" as marx defined it, and then kept
adapting it so that it fit what the thugs who ran the soviet empire
wanted. Every country makes adaptations, no matter what form of
government it states is has or had or wants. We do it here.

One more time...the nazis were not socialists.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.


snerk

Snerk, you were wrong.



--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 4/16/10 8:27 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.


snerk

Snerk, you were wrong.




Please...we already know you are a moron whose "knowledge of the world"
has been spoonfed to you by lunatic right-wing websites. Norman Thomas
was a socialist; Adolf Hitler was not.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On 16/04/2010 6:39 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/16/10 8:27 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.


snerk

Snerk, you were wrong.




Please...we already know you are a moron whose "knowledge of the world"
has been spoonfed to you by lunatic right-wing websites. Norman Thomas
was a socialist; Adolf Hitler was not.

You can go back to your tea bags now.


--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On Apr 14, 7:44*am, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:

On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...al-boyfriend-s....

Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.

What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.


Then Krause, why was it reported by the Associated Press?

http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=12297759

On Apr 14, 8:14*am, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:



On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...al-boyfriend-s....

Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.

What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.

People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.

I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language.

Does your brain see, interpret, and understand photoshop, Herr Krause?