On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:08:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:




People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

people are already getting healthcare on someone else's dime. when i
was a student nurse we charged LOTS of money to insurance companies
for aspirins, etc. that money went to pay for some people who couldnt
pay their bills

you guys just are too stupid to know the current system is rigged.

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than
spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

really? let's look at the evidence:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26...nce/index.html

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of
Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors
with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average,
people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.


DAMN!! guess that means limball has an IQ of 10.

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.



--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 4/15/10 8:17 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.




Your argument regarding socialist leanings and intellect is specious but
in any event, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.

By "Adolph," are you referring to *Adolf* Hitler? If so, he was no
socialist. Please don't toss out the National Socialist term. The Nazis
were not socialists.

And what is this latest insanity, about social skills? By many accounts,
Einstein was an eccentric but charming man who had many, many friends.
He lent his name and gave his time to many of his friends.

You need to wean yourself from the teabaggers.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.

On 15/04/2010 4:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.


adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Read the Etymology but will save you a click:

"The term Nazi derives from the first two syllables of
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (*National Socialist
German Workers*’ Party, NSDAP).[23] Members of the Nazi Party
identified themselves as Nationalsozialisten (National Socialists),
rarely as Nazis. The German term Nazi parallels the analogous political
term Sozi, an abbreviation for a member of the Sozialdemokratische
Partei Deutschlands (Social Democratic Party of Germany).[24][25] In
1933, when Adolf Hitler assumed power of the German government, usage of
the term Nazi diminished in Germany, although Austrian anti-Nazis used
it as an insult."

What part of socialism do you not understand?

In its purest of forms, in an ideal world pure socialism is a good
concept. But it fails as in the real imperfect world we human creatures
*******ise it towards our own ends. Just like Hitler did.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.


snerk

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.

what they called themselves is irrelevant

what they DID is relevant

you can't even dodge the issue

On Apr 15, 5:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote:



On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.

adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin.

NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing
that lefties always do. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a
dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All
equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom.

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:30:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/04/2010 4:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600,
wrote:



adolph was a socialist?

guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked
the communist stalin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism


What part of socialism do you not understand?

the part where a 'socialist' hangs out with fascists, and attacks
socialists and communists

so try answering the question, m'kay?