On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/




Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.


People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.



I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any
better than they write.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On 14/04/2010 7:14 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/





Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.


People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.



I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any
better than they write.

Seen many a liberal losers too have problems.

Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than
spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really
means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

.. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.



--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 4/15/10 8:17 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.

Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social
skills to go with the IQ.




Your argument regarding socialist leanings and intellect is specious but
in any event, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.

By "Adolph," are you referring to *Adolf* Hitler? If so, he was no
socialist. Please don't toss out the National Socialist term. The Nazis
were not socialists.

And what is this latest insanity, about social skills? By many accounts,
Einstein was an eccentric but charming man who had many, many friends.
He lent his name and gave his time to many of his friends.

You need to wean yourself from the teabaggers.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really
means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself.

Oh, I know precisely what the term means, and my use of the term is
deliberate. It obviously annoys you. Mission accomplished.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than
spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

really? let's look at the evidence:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26...nce/index.html

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of
Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors
with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average,
people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.


DAMN!! guess that means limball has an IQ of 10.

On Apr 14, 8:14*am, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:



On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...al-boyfriend-s....

Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.

What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.

People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.

I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language.

Does your brain see, interpret, and understand photoshop, Herr Krause?