Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:42:44 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/


guess he missed all the armed idiots who showed up at an obama
speech...or the arrest of the hutaree terrorists who hated obama

That stuff doesn't show up on Worldnut Daily.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/

Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/


Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 14/04/2010 5:44 AM, A.Boater wrote:
What the HELL is WRONG with you people?

First, most of the rabid anti-Obama crowd has been buying ordinance and
burying it in the backyard since he was elected, driving the price of
everything pertaining to guns, rounds, or reloading into the stratosphere
and the availability into nothingness.

Second, there is no evidence that anything even remotely resembling a Palin
pin was implicated in this vicious attack. Thus far, the perpetrators are
more likely Bush style Nazi's or crazed anarchists than anybody associated
with Obama. Quit spreading unsubstantiated right-wing gossip like a
girlie-man.

Actually isn't the first one I have read about. I should start
collecting them. You don't have to look too far to see what happens in
a long term decay. Greece is a good example, many actually have
personal body guards which is more common than the US.

When people are addicted to other peoples money they will do anything.
Never forget about 15 years ago when our premier reduced welfare for
abled people and downsized government to fit the budget. Small groups
of greedy would litterally climb the roof of his personal residence
chanting. Scared the hell out of his wife. It ended abruptly when
neighbors came out with bassball bats...and hospitalized them, even
destroyed their vehicles.

People will have to be prepared to protect their life and property.
Would not doubt theft is up big time.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/



Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.


People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/




Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.


People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.



I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any
better than they write.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 14/04/2010 7:14 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/





Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those
that want to stick up for their rights.



What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website
of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story.

It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the
original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the
Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation
but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were
also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that
was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even
read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar
I have seen on their signs.


People in America should know they are being censored from reality by
now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free"
health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come
clean, who is paying for it?

And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see
what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if
history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse.



I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with
the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any
better than they write.

Seen many a liberal losers too have problems.

Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than
spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.

But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really
means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

.. And it is a known fact that the higher you go
on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be.


Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

A.Boater wrote:
What the HELL is WRONG with you people?

First, most of the rabid anti-Obama crowd has been buying ordinance and
burying it in the backyard since he was elected, driving the price of
everything pertaining to guns, rounds, or reloading into the stratosphere
and the availability into nothingness.

Second, there is no evidence that anything even remotely resembling a Palin
pin was implicated in this vicious attack. Thus far, the perpetrators are
more likely Bush style Nazi's or crazed anarchists than anybody associated
with Obama. Quit spreading unsubstantiated right-wing gossip like a
girlie-man.

No kidding. I was at Bass Pro the other day and there wasn't a box of
..38 in the place. The shelves were empty of most handgun ammunition and
many rifle rounds. Shotgun shells were piled high.

Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
 

On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really
means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself.

Oh, I know precisely what the term means, and my use of the term is
deliberate. It obviously annoys you. Mission accomplished.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym