|
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against
political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Most everyone is armed, in these parts. Most people are civil and would not think of assaulting someone because of political affiliation. These groups are bussed into political events. They are not usually from the area. Dangerous or confrontational types make up most of these groups. Yes, it is about intimidation. For everyone that these people shout down or commit thugery on one thousand will stay away, from future events. We have though our Country and Society was different. We were but these elements intend to bring about their agenda and their reward at any cost. imo |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:17:09 -0400, hk
wrote: On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " Sounds like that girl who was attacked by a large, black man during the presidential race. Self-inflicted. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/13/10 3:21 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:17:09 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " Sounds like that girl who was attacked by a large, black man during the presidential race. Self-inflicted. It's impossible to take frogwatch seriously...on *any* subject. -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:30:25 -0400, hk wrote:
On 4/13/10 3:21 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:17:09 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " Sounds like that girl who was attacked by a large, black man during the presidential race. Self-inflicted. It's impossible to take frogwatch seriously...on *any* subject. Do you think he's stil on the wife's meds? Is he a pot smoker? |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Good grief. Get a life. Or, at least change the tinfoil hat from time to time. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/13/10 3:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:21 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:17:09 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " Sounds like that girl who was attacked by a large, black man during the presidential race. Self-inflicted. It's impossible to take frogwatch seriously...on *any* subject. Do you think he's stil on the wife's meds? Is he a pot smoker? It's possible he is naturally that way. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/13/10 3:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:30:25 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:21 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:17:09 -0400, wrote: On 4/13/10 3:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ No wonder you are so foched in the head...you rely on fantasy blogs: "we also understand from someone who visited Allee Bautsch in the hospital Saturday morning that she and Brown were followed and attacked expressly because they had Palin pins on (she heard one of the attackers say “Let’s get them, they have Palin pins on” – so the attack WAS politically motivated as its victims understood it. " Sounds like that girl who was attacked by a large, black man during the presidential race. Self-inflicted. It's impossible to take frogwatch seriously...on *any* subject. Do you think he's stil on the wife's meds? Is he a pot smoker? I don't usually run into paranoids as far out there as froggy or canuck, but... ....way back in "the day," when my wife was interning at one of the huge Florida state hospitals (650-700 beds) for those "way out there," I would sometimes meet her for lunch and "encounter" inmate-patients who talked like they do...patients overwhelmed by paranoia. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ guess he missed all the armed idiots who showed up at an obama speech...or the arrest of the hutaree terrorists who hated obama |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:42:44 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ guess he missed all the armed idiots who showed up at an obama speech...or the arrest of the hutaree terrorists who hated obama That stuff doesn't show up on Worldnut Daily. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar I have seen on their signs. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 14/04/2010 5:44 AM, A.Boater wrote:
What the HELL is WRONG with you people? First, most of the rabid anti-Obama crowd has been buying ordinance and burying it in the backyard since he was elected, driving the price of everything pertaining to guns, rounds, or reloading into the stratosphere and the availability into nothingness. Second, there is no evidence that anything even remotely resembling a Palin pin was implicated in this vicious attack. Thus far, the perpetrators are more likely Bush style Nazi's or crazed anarchists than anybody associated with Obama. Quit spreading unsubstantiated right-wing gossip like a girlie-man. Actually isn't the first one I have read about. I should start collecting them. You don't have to look too far to see what happens in a long term decay. Greece is a good example, many actually have personal body guards which is more common than the US. When people are addicted to other peoples money they will do anything. Never forget about 15 years ago when our premier reduced welfare for abled people and downsized government to fit the budget. Small groups of greedy would litterally climb the roof of his personal residence chanting. Scared the hell out of his wife. It ended abruptly when neighbors came out with bassball bats...and hospitalized them, even destroyed their vehicles. People will have to be prepared to protect their life and property. Would not doubt theft is up big time. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar I have seen on their signs. People in America should know they are being censored from reality by now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free" health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come clean, who is paying for it? And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar I have seen on their signs. People in America should know they are being censored from reality by now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free" health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come clean, who is paying for it? And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse. I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any better than they write. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 14/04/2010 7:14 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...-media-silent/ Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar I have seen on their signs. People in America should know they are being censored from reality by now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free" health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come clean, who is paying for it? And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse. I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with the English language. Serious issues. Tells me they don't think any better than they write. Seen many a liberal losers too have problems. Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
.. And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
A.Boater wrote:
What the HELL is WRONG with you people? First, most of the rabid anti-Obama crowd has been buying ordinance and burying it in the backyard since he was elected, driving the price of everything pertaining to guns, rounds, or reloading into the stratosphere and the availability into nothingness. Second, there is no evidence that anything even remotely resembling a Palin pin was implicated in this vicious attack. Thus far, the perpetrators are more likely Bush style Nazi's or crazed anarchists than anybody associated with Obama. Quit spreading unsubstantiated right-wing gossip like a girlie-man. No kidding. I was at Bass Pro the other day and there wasn't a box of ..38 in the place. The shelves were empty of most handgun ammunition and many rifle rounds. Shotgun shells were piled high. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
But you are not so good yourself, not knowing what teabaggers really means. But that is typical of an anal retentive liberal like yourrself. Oh, I know precisely what the term means, and my use of the term is deliberate. It obviously annoys you. Mission accomplished. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:08:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: People in America should know they are being censored from reality by now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free" health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come clean, who is paying for it? people are already getting healthcare on someone else's dime. when i was a student nurse we charged LOTS of money to insurance companies for aspirins, etc. that money went to pay for some people who couldnt pay their bills you guys just are too stupid to know the current system is rigged. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: Depends on your values. I value integrity, honor and honesty more than spelling and liberalism. And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. really? let's look at the evidence: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26...nce/index.html Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. DAMN!! guess that means limball has an IQ of 10. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/15/10 8:17 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. Your argument regarding socialist leanings and intellect is specious but in any event, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. By "Adolph," are you referring to *Adolf* Hitler? If so, he was no socialist. Please don't toss out the National Socialist term. The Nazis were not socialists. And what is this latest insanity, about social skills? By many accounts, Einstein was an eccentric but charming man who had many, many friends. He lent his name and gave his time to many of his friends. You need to wean yourself from the teabaggers. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 15/04/2010 4:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism Read the Etymology but will save you a click: "The term Nazi derives from the first two syllables of Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (*National Socialist German Workers*’ Party, NSDAP).[23] Members of the Nazi Party identified themselves as Nationalsozialisten (National Socialists), rarely as Nazis. The German term Nazi parallels the analogous political term Sozi, an abbreviation for a member of the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (Social Democratic Party of Germany).[24][25] In 1933, when Adolf Hitler assumed power of the German government, usage of the term Nazi diminished in Germany, although Austrian anti-Nazis used it as an insult." What part of socialism do you not understand? In its purest of forms, in an ideal world pure socialism is a good concept. But it fails as in the real imperfect world we human creatures *******ise it towards our own ends. Just like Hitler did. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. snerk -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. what they called themselves is irrelevant what they DID is relevant you can't even dodge the issue |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Apr 15, 5:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. *So was Adolph. *But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing that lefties always do. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:30:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/04/2010 4:43 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism What part of socialism do you not understand? the part where a 'socialist' hangs out with fascists, and attacks socialists and communists so try answering the question, m'kay? |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Apr 15, 5:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43*pm, bpuharic wrote: guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing that lefties always do. nice circular argument. typical of the right did hitler nationalize businesses? nope. did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep. did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up in concentration camps to the right this proves he was a leftist. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom. fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, bpuharic wrote: guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. NAzis acted very much like socialists even did the mass murder thing that lefties always do. nice circular argument. typical of the right did hitler nationalize businesses? nope. did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep. did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up in concentration camps to the right this proves he was a leftist. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom. fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx. Was the most successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:46:54 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, bpuharic wrote: did hitler nationalize businesses? nope. did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep. did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up in concentration camps to the right this proves he was a leftist. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom. fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx. blah blah blah...a communist is someone who calls himself a communist Was the most successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR. yeah and 'christianity' has never been tried either blah blah blah |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/16/10 6:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:46:54 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 5:21 pm, wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote: did hitler nationalize businesses? nope. did he worship mussolini, the fascist? yep. did he hate communists and murder them? yep. a number of them wound up in concentration camps to the right this proves he was a leftist. Hitler and Stalin, two peas in a pod, not a dimes worth of difference. Communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism All equal STATISM and none believe in personal freedom. fascism is right wing statism. and hitler was a fascist Actually Communism per Russia was not communism per Marx. blah blah blah...a communist is someone who calls himself a communist Was the most successful dictatorship in at least modern history. The "Party" members lived well. And they were only a couple million in all of the USSR. yeah and 'christianity' has never been tried either blah blah blah Many righties suffer from a rigid personality disorder in themselves, in what they believe, and in how they think the world should be. The soviets adapted "communism" as marx defined it, and then kept adapting it so that it fit what the thugs who ran the soviet empire wanted. Every country makes adaptations, no matter what form of government it states is has or had or wants. We do it here. One more time...the nazis were not socialists. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. snerk Snerk, you were wrong. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 4/16/10 8:27 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote: On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. snerk Snerk, you were wrong. Please...we already know you are a moron whose "knowledge of the world" has been spoonfed to you by lunatic right-wing websites. Norman Thomas was a socialist; Adolf Hitler was not. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On 16/04/2010 6:39 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/16/10 8:27 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 15/04/2010 6:31 PM, hk wrote: On 4/15/10 8:21 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 15, 3:43 pm, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:17:26 -0600, wrote: On 14/04/2010 5:44 PM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 7:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote: . And it is a known fact that the higher you go on the intellect scale, the less socialist you are likely to be. Albert Einstein was a socialist. You are an unemployed asshole. Of course there are exceptions. So was Adolph. But neither had social skills to go with the IQ. adolph was a socialist? guess that's why he hung out with the fascist mussolini, and attacked the communist stalin NAZIs didnt call themselves the National Socialist Party for nuthin. snerk Snerk, you were wrong. Please...we already know you are a moron whose "knowledge of the world" has been spoonfed to you by lunatic right-wing websites. Norman Thomas was a socialist; Adolf Hitler was not. You can go back to your tea bags now. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Apr 14, 7:44*am, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...al-boyfriend-s.... Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. Then Krause, why was it reported by the Associated Press? http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=12297759 |
Should anti Obama people start arming themselves
On Apr 14, 8:14*am, hk wrote:
On 4/14/10 9:08 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 14/04/2010 6:44 AM, hk wrote: On 4/14/10 8:33 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 13/04/2010 1:13 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Another in a long list of violent attacks by Obamanists against political opposition. http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...al-boyfriend-s.... Sounds like a low profile war between those who want to steal and those that want to stick up for their rights. What it sounds like is that Froggy was once again taken in by a website of right-wing nutcases. There's nothing to the "news" story. It's too bad you teabaggers are besmirching the causes and memory of the original tea party in Boston. Every New England schoolkid knows the Boston Tea Party was staged mainly as a protest *not* against taxation but against taxation without representation. Now, those Bostonians were also protesting a tax subsidy given to the East India Company, but that was the minor issue. Most of today's "teabaggers" probably couldn't even read a history book, based upon the examples of bad spelling and grammar I have seen on their signs. People in America should know they are being censored from reality by now no? A managed herd if you will. They show people wanting "free" health care on other peopels dime but don't show the signs saying come clean, who is paying for it? And if you can't tell those pics were doctored up, well, guess you see what you want to see. Just be thankful this is a PR war so far. But if history repeats and it usually does, it will get worse. I've seen teabaggers and their posters first-hand. They have issues with the English language. Does your brain see, interpret, and understand photoshop, Herr Krause? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com