On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:19:14 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



You democriters might want to take a look at Japan for what is in sore
for the debtors of America and unwilling more consrvative types is Obama
isn't stopped with his debt-spend-debt-spend mania.

really? our economy is growing. guess that escaped your attention.


I hate to see America get flushed down the toilet for debt mongering
selfish liberal debt spending *******s.

now let's see...

you admit right wingers are big spenders

they make more debt than liberals...

yet you blame it all on obama...kind of forgetting he wasn't even born
in 29.

oh well...guess limball hasn't caught up with you guys yet

What 10% decrease in unemployment?

from 10.7 to 9.7 over obama's adminstration....

We will have a bump in employment this
quarter because of the Census. But they are minimum wage mostly and is a
short time employment. We are actually going to have a really hard time
getting employment up. When you can buy a finished product FOB your door
from a foreign manufacturer cheaper than you can buy the raw materials. We
are in deep kimchi.

to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:19:14 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



You democriters might want to take a look at Japan for what is in sore
for the debtors of America and unwilling more consrvative types is Obama
isn't stopped with his debt-spend-debt-spend mania.

really? our economy is growing. guess that escaped your attention.


I hate to see America get flushed down the toilet for debt mongering
selfish liberal debt spending *******s.

now let's see...

you admit right wingers are big spenders

they make more debt than liberals...

yet you blame it all on obama...kind of forgetting he wasn't even born
in 29.

oh well...guess limball hasn't caught up with you guys yet

What 10% decrease in unemployment?

from 10.7 to 9.7 over obama's adminstration....

We will have a bump in employment this
quarter because of the Census. But they are minimum wage mostly and is a
short time employment. We are actually going to have a really hard time
getting employment up. When you can buy a finished product FOB your door
from a foreign manufacturer cheaper than you can buy the raw materials.
We
are in deep kimchi.

to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment under
8%. How has that worked out?
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=...mployment+rate

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:19:14 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



You democriters might want to take a look at Japan for what is in sore
for the debtors of America and unwilling more consrvative types is
Obama
isn't stopped with his debt-spend-debt-spend mania.

really? our economy is growing. guess that escaped your attention.


I hate to see America get flushed down the toilet for debt mongering
selfish liberal debt spending *******s.

now let's see...

you admit right wingers are big spenders

they make more debt than liberals...

yet you blame it all on obama...kind of forgetting he wasn't even born
in 29.

oh well...guess limball hasn't caught up with you guys yet

What 10% decrease in unemployment?

from 10.7 to 9.7 over obama's adminstration....

We will have a bump in employment this
quarter because of the Census. But they are minimum wage mostly and is a
short time employment. We are actually going to have a really hard time
getting employment up. When you can buy a finished product FOB your door
from a foreign manufacturer cheaper than you can buy the raw materials.
We
are in deep kimchi.

to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment under
8%. How has that worked out?
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=...mployment+rate



How would it have worked out without the stimulus? Hmmm.... 25% maybe? A
real depression maybe?

And, of course, the Stim was passed on Feb. 13, 2009, so Obama did it. YOU
ARE AN IDIOT.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers skyrocking
before this under his watch means nothing?

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers skyrocking
before this under his watch means nothing?

gee..it's been about 6 months or so since the 1.5M jobs obama created
pulled the rate from 10.7 to 9.7.

and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than
that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment
under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers
skyrocking
before this under his watch means nothing?

gee..it's been about 6 months or so since the 1.5M jobs obama created
pulled the rate from 10.7 to 9.7.

and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did




But Bush's financial advisors are the same people working for Obama. Did
they get smarter?

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:08:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did




But Bush's financial advisors are the ople working for Obama. Did
they get smarter?

they must have. the economy is improving and the middle class now have
a healthcare program.

actually the problem was bush's inaction and belief in the unregulated
free market. bernanke and geithner now support regulation that they
didn't before. and the democrats are pushing it, while the republicans
meet in secret with wall street

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment
under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers
skyrocking before this under his watch means nothing?

Not all, but at least we're headed in the right direction, except for
nutcases like you of course. You can't be helped.

--
Nom=de=Plume