On 4/10/10 5:16 PM, Jack wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, wrote:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html

So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

A guy jumped in the water behind a boat with a running motor. The
driver of the boat puts the boat in reverse, and hits the guy with the
prop.

The boat manufacturer has to pay.

That's so screwed up it's almost unbelievable. Almost.



A president and his vice president lie about WMDs, and tens of thousands
of people paid the price with their lives and pocketbooks.

That's so screwed up it is unbelievable.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 10, 6:10*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/10/10 5:16 PM, Jack wrote:

On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, *wrote:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html

So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

A guy jumped in the water behind a boat with a running motor. *The
driver of the boat puts the boat in reverse, and hits the guy with the
prop.

The boat manufacturer has to pay.

That's so screwed up it's almost unbelievable. *Almost.

A president and his vice president lie about WMDs, and tens of thousands
of people paid the price with their lives and pocketbooks.

That's so screwed up it is unbelievable.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

You act like a ****ing little boy out on the playground - *everyone
look at me, look at me, pay attention to me*.....
What in HELL does this thread have to do with politics, at least until
you injected your bull****?

On 4/11/10 10:15 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 10, 6:10 pm, wrote:
On 4/10/10 5:16 PM, Jack wrote:

On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, wrote:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html

So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

A guy jumped in the water behind a boat with a running motor. The
driver of the boat puts the boat in reverse, and hits the guy with the
prop.

The boat manufacturer has to pay.

That's so screwed up it's almost unbelievable. Almost.

A president and his vice president lie about WMDs, and tens of thousands
of people paid the price with their lives and pocketbooks.

That's so screwed up it is unbelievable.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

You act like a ****ing little boy out on the playground - *everyone
look at me, look at me, pay attention to me*.....
What in HELL does this thread have to do with politics, at least until
you injected your bull****?



Here's a secret for you...I don't give a damn about what passes for
thought in your pea-sized brain. BTW, it's spring here. When are you
planning to make your promised visit here to engage in criminal assault
and home invasion?


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 11, 10:58*am, hk wrote:
On 4/11/10 10:15 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 10, 6:10 pm, *wrote:
On 4/10/10 5:16 PM, Jack wrote:

On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, * *wrote:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html

So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

A guy jumped in the water behind a boat with a running motor. *The
driver of the boat puts the boat in reverse, and hits the guy with the
prop.

The boat manufacturer has to pay.

That's so screwed up it's almost unbelievable. *Almost.

A president and his vice president lie about WMDs, and tens of thousands
of people paid the price with their lives and pocketbooks.

That's so screwed up it is unbelievable.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

You act like a ****ing little boy out on the playground - *everyone
look at me, look at me, pay attention to me*.....
What in HELL does this thread have to do with politics, at least until
you injected your bull****?

Here's a secret for you...I don't give a damn about what passes for
thought in your pea-sized brain. BTW, it's spring here. When are you
planning to make your promised visit here to engage in criminal assault
and home invasion?

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Please show where I ever said I was going to criminally assault
anyone. Then please show where I said I was going to do a home
invasion. See you in a few weeks, but please answer these allegations
of yours first.

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, Tim wrote:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html

So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

A guy jumped in the water behind a boat with a running motor. The
driver of the boat puts the boat in reverse, and hits the guy with the
prop.

The boat manufacturer has to pay.

That's so screwed up it's almost unbelievable. Almost.
------
Brunswick should have provided smarter friends.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html


So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

The blame is partly with the insurance industry. They have frequently
taken the short sighted view that it is cheaper to settle some of
these claims than it is to fight them. That's probably true for any
one case but the long term effect is to set expensive precedents.

On 10/04/2010 4:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html


So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

The blame is partly with the insurance industry. They have frequently
taken the short sighted view that it is cheaper to settle some of
these claims than it is to fight them. That's probably true for any
one case but the long term effect is to set expensive precedents.

Yep. But also begets higher rates and more profit.

Mystifies me how they could lose this case. Even dumb as nails jury
can't be this stupid.

Brunswick shoul counter sue the driver and the swimer. Make their lives
hell.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 10/04/2010 4:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html


So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

The blame is partly with the insurance industry. They have frequently
taken the short sighted view that it is cheaper to settle some of
these claims than it is to fight them. That's probably true for any
one case but the long term effect is to set expensive precedents.

Yep. But also begets higher rates and more profit.

Mystifies me how they could lose this case. Even dumb as nails jury can't
be this stupid.

Brunswick shoul counter sue the driver and the swimer. Make their lives
hell.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.


And now, straight from Rush/Beck's sitcom, we have nucknuck who doesn't like
the jury system.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/04/2010 7:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 10/04/2010 4:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html


So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

The blame is partly with the insurance industry. They have frequently
taken the short sighted view that it is cheaper to settle some of
these claims than it is to fight them. That's probably true for any
one case but the long term effect is to set expensive precedents.

Yep. But also begets higher rates and more profit.

Mystifies me how they could lose this case. Even dumb as nails jury can't
be this stupid.

Brunswick shoul counter sue the driver and the swimer. Make their lives
hell.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.


And now, straight from Rush/Beck's sitcom, we have nucknuck who doesn't like
the jury system.

I think competance has something to do with it. Minimum reading skills,
college or university...

Would not want to be a innocent defendant facing a jury that could only
think of fried chicken and your skin color (either way).

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 10/04/2010 7:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 10/04/2010 4:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...D9ETMVA02.html


So now what, will this become a safety standard of the industry that
props should have guards?

The blame is partly with the insurance industry. They have frequently
taken the short sighted view that it is cheaper to settle some of
these claims than it is to fight them. That's probably true for any
one case but the long term effect is to set expensive precedents.

Yep. But also begets higher rates and more profit.

Mystifies me how they could lose this case. Even dumb as nails jury
can't
be this stupid.

Brunswick shoul counter sue the driver and the swimer. Make their lives
hell.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.


And now, straight from Rush/Beck's sitcom, we have nucknuck who doesn't
like
the jury system.

I think competance has something to do with it. Minimum reading skills,
college or university...

Would not want to be a innocent defendant facing a jury that could only
think of fried chicken and your skin color (either way).

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.


Why don't we have a literacy test at the polling place. How about a poll tax
to ensure they are true capitalists. Or, how about you can only vote if
you're a landowner.

I guess all the voters who elected Mr. Obama were only thinking about his
skin color (the black voters), since the Republican party has made such
great strides in race relations of late.

--
Nom=de=Plume