My next sailing fantasy
 

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:14:10 -0400, hk
wrote:

Get a job that does something for humanity

Been there, done that, have the tee shirt, etc.

What have you done for humanity lately?

My next sailing fantasy
 

On 4/10/10 7:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:14:10 -0400,
wrote:

Get a job that does something for humanity

Been there, done that, have the tee shirt, etc.


Uh-huh.


What have you done for humanity lately?

It would blow you away, w'hine


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

My next sailing fantasy
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.


Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume

My next sailing fantasy
 

On Apr 10, 9:13*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

My next sailing fantasy
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

"John wrote in message
...


On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:50:06 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:



On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:25:23 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:



When I'm touring in that area, I'm constantly wishing I'd brought my
boat. It's beautiful.


Absolutely right. That's our old cruising ground and we still get
back there once in a while. The area of Maine in the vicinity of Mt
Desert Island and Acadia Nataiona Park is arguably the most scenic
part of the entire US east coast. The lobster trap and fog issues
are very real, but surmountable with a little practice and experience.


Next time you're in that neck of the woods and you need a deckhand that
doesn't
chase whiskey and women, let me know.


Hee hee...we could make a reality show from you two 'cruzin' the
NorthEast
area.




You use the word "we" too much, Don. Do you have an imaginary fan club?


Fan this club....... WeeBoy!



That's really your response? OK then.

My next sailing fantasy
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

My next sailing fantasy
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Is he paying the Palm Sisters now? They used to be satisfied with a good
quality lotion once in a while.

My next sailing fantasy
 

On Apr 11, 2:51*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Thanks for proving ny point.

My next sailing fantasy
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 11, 2:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Thanks for proving ny point.


Ny has a point? Actually it has them in each corner.
--
Nom=de=Plume

My next sailing fantasy
 

On Apr 11, 1:51*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Point proven, Jack.