| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
My next sailing fantasy
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 12, 12:47*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud |
My next sailing fantasy
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind anonymous IDs. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 12, 2:26*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message m... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind anonymous IDs. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady? |
My next sailing fantasy
On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, wrote: On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind anonymous IDs. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady? You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or worse. .. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 12, 2:54*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, *wrote: On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, * *wrote: * *wrote in message .... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, * *wrote: * *wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, * *wrote: * *wrote in message news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4ax. com... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind anonymous IDs. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady? You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or worse. Okay..... I'm not..... |
My next sailing fantasy
Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2:54 pm, hk wrote: On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, wrote: On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind anonymous IDs. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady? You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or worse. Okay..... I'm not..... I knew he'd talk you out of it. |
My next sailing fantasy
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). |
My next sailing fantasy
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). Yes, you're all of those things. Do you have a point or are you just foaming at the mouth again? -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
On 4/12/10 9:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). Yes, you're all of those things. Do you have a point or are you just foaming at the mouth again? "Larry" was funnier when he was Dan Krueger, but, alas, Freddie Krueger sued him for defamation of the Krueger family name. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 12, 8:33*pm, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message m... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. *You're a stalker. *You're not qualified to tell me what to do. *You have no life outside of here. *You're a hillbilly. *You are an idiot. *Next time read the thread. *Show me where I said that. *I think faster than I type. *You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. *I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. |
My next sailing fantasy
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, Larry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message m... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? |
My next sailing fantasy
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. |
My next sailing fantasy
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. Comes and goes... not sure why. It mostly works. -- Nom=de=Plume |
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 14, 7:48*pm, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, * wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4a x.com... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. *Ewww...that'sa nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. *Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. *Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. The problem is between the seat cushion and the keyboard. |
My next sailing fantasy
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Apr 14, 7:48 pm, Larry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4a x.com... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that'sa nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. The problem is between the seat cushion and the keyboard. Right. That's why I have to type the word reply from time to time. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com