wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:20:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:17:35 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:36:47 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 10/04/2010 7:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:


yeah. we haven't had a pay increase in 10 years. why do you think the
rich need a tax decrease when their income has trippled while the
middle class should continue to pay all the taxes?


Well I suppose
the other 85% making it in less says tough ****.
The 3% over $250,000 did just get their taxes raised, a lot.

great. they deserve it.

So, keep voting for the same statism and they will arange for things to
be more expensive and lower you net income.

both the dems and GOPS spend like drunken sailors.

the dems spend on the middle class

the GOP spends on the rich.

i'll go with the dems

The dems are supposed to be spending on the working class. No wonder
they lost all the flyover states.


Try again. You're just wrong.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ama_vs_mccain/


Take those 25 cities out of the equation and see what you get.
Do a precinct map and see how red we are

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:El...rpleCounty.jpg



You can slice it anyway you want. The fact is that the majority of the
population is no longer rural.

--
Nom=de=Plume