About Us

nom=de=plume

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:08:04 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:31:41 -0700, wrote:

Every time you drive up to the pump, you pay more in federal tax
for a
single gallon of gasoline (18.4 cents) than ExxonMobil paid in
U.S.
income taxes in 2009. That's in spite of the fact that the
world's
second largest company had a gross operating profit of nearly $53

Corporations don't pay taxes, their customers do..
If they paid any additional taxes, it would simply show up in the
price of gas, with the profit tacked on.
I understand some people do want to increase taxes on gasoline and
this is a way to do it but understand that is what you would be
doing.

Flawed logic. Exxonmobil is simply a conduit for sales taxes paid
by
you and me. Doesn't make a whit of difference to ExxonMobil, whose
profit was the largest in history last year, while paying no taxes.

You think that's fair? Not me.

I do the same for the city, state and government when selling
retail
but that doesn't make my company a productive tax producer, just a
conduit.

Where I produce for the state is in state revenue taxes and federal
income taxes.

Profitable corporations do not pay taxes. They pay a business
expense. And
expenses are calculated in to the price the consumer pays.

Do you have an example of that? Pick a publicly traded company and
look at their balance sheet and financial statement. Profits =
taxes. If they were an expense they would reduce the profits.

Profits are what you have after expenses. So the tax expense is built
in to the cost structure. XOM may not pay any US income tax, but I
pay on my dividends I receive from them. Also 46% of the workers in
this country do not pay income tax. And lots of those get back extra
from the government. Is one thing to not pay taxes, but to get back
money is criminal. Criminal for government. A family of 4 making $50k
will not pay any income tax. But they get all the benefits of
society. They get an 11k deduction that everyone gets, which leaves
them an about $2k tax bill. They they get a $K credit for each kid.
the $2k tax bill is now zero. That is middle class America making
$50k.

As usual, you've misrepresented what that means:

"About 47 percent will pay no federal income taxes at all for 2009.
Either their incomes were too low, or they qualified for enough
credits, deductions and exemptions to eliminate their liability."

Your philosophy: Soak the middle/lower earners, let the rich get
richer.

--
Nom=de=Plume

the middle owners are paying little of the tax bill. When people making
$50k pay zero $ and a person like Greg with no mortgage deduction pays
about 10%, there is little soak the middle lower earners.

Good grief... you're being pretty simple-minded. Read the thread section
where gfretwell and I are actually having a rational discussion.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Come out of my ignoring you to say you are still a twit! You have never
had a rational discussion.

Sorry for your loss of reality. Pray for rain.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Exploiting low income workers	Charles Momsen	ASA	0	November 6th 08 03:03 PM
anyone want voyaging on a small income by annie hill?	yihang bmc-unsw	Boat Building	0	April 27th 04 02:13 AM

Menu

About Us