Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default New economic model

On 04/04/2010 10:14 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
m...
On 4/4/10 9:05 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
I have done just what this administration has encouraged me to do, I
have eliminated employees. It simply is no longer worth having them
when the amount of paperwork and worry over all the govt forms is so
great so you just outsource everything.


You've eliminated employees because you don't have any work for them to
do. Period.



It's not 100 percent Obama. His policies are simply starting to dot the
"i"s and cross the "t"s in a change that has been taking place and
accelerating for the past 15-20 years.

Small business used to find anything for employees to do during slow
periods in order to avoid layoffs.
I can remember painting walls, washing trucks, etc. and did the same when
I operated a company on my own. Large businesses typically had layoffs,
not the small ones.

Eisboch


Just 98.7 percent? Come on. This trend as you said has been going on a long
time. It's nothing new. Times are tough. The recession is over, but job
growth lags. That's typical of all recessions. But, the trend is positive,
and most economists are now not predicting a double dip recession.


While I agree it is typical for employment to lag a GDP based recovery,
it never has had this long and the spread. Certainly not in 1982 it didn't.

Much of it is inflation. Just hasn't fully hit retail yet. And without
the jobs, and I mean real jobs not just minimum wage part time stuff,
the recovery will stall and inflation will take like the 70's all over
again.

I see the USD dropped again today.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default New economic model

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 10:14 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
m...
On 4/4/10 9:05 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
I have done just what this administration has encouraged me to do, I
have eliminated employees. It simply is no longer worth having them
when the amount of paperwork and worry over all the govt forms is so
great so you just outsource everything.


You've eliminated employees because you don't have any work for them to
do. Period.



It's not 100 percent Obama. His policies are simply starting to dot the
"i"s and cross the "t"s in a change that has been taking place and
accelerating for the past 15-20 years.

Small business used to find anything for employees to do during slow
periods in order to avoid layoffs.
I can remember painting walls, washing trucks, etc. and did the same
when
I operated a company on my own. Large businesses typically had
layoffs,
not the small ones.

Eisboch


Just 98.7 percent? Come on. This trend as you said has been going on a
long
time. It's nothing new. Times are tough. The recession is over, but job
growth lags. That's typical of all recessions. But, the trend is
positive,
and most economists are now not predicting a double dip recession.


While I agree it is typical for employment to lag a GDP based recovery, it
never has had this long and the spread. Certainly not in 1982 it didn't.


Thanks GWB! Rock on.


Much of it is inflation. Just hasn't fully hit retail yet. And without
the jobs, and I mean real jobs not just minimum wage part time stuff, the
recovery will stall and inflation will take like the 70's all over again.


There's very little inflation. That's just your ignorant rant. The Fed's
primary job (has been for a long time) is to keep that under control.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default New economic model

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:51:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



While I agree it is typical for employment to lag a GDP based recovery,
it never has had this long and the spread. Certainly not in 1982 it didn't.


really? got proof? and this bush-caused depression is much deeper than
others


Much of it is inflation. Just hasn't fully hit retail yet. And without
the jobs, and I mean real jobs not just minimum wage part time stuff,
the recovery will stall and inflation will take like the 70's all over
again.


really? inflation was 2% last year



I see the USD dropped again today.


it's called 'fluctuation'
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Economic Shocker [email protected] General 0 April 28th 09 08:12 PM
Economic collapse Charles Momsen ASA 0 October 20th 08 07:36 PM
Brig Fair American - semi-assembled wooden sailing ship model - Model Shipways Kit [EBay] Bruce Duty Tall Ships 0 September 1st 08 09:12 PM
Think this has anything to do with the economic problems? [email protected] General 67 March 22nd 08 02:51 PM
An Authentic Collectible Ship Model win hearts of many with beautiful exclusive hand built model ships from scratch. Yahya General 5 November 11th 04 07:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017