Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 9, 11:47*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message om... nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message om... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation in Gitmo is clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS uses a string of vulgarities so, why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more. Not sure about you or Larry. You are one of double standards, D'Plume. I take it you're not an equal opportunity condemner? Too bad for you. Why don't you plonk me? Oh, I know why... you've just got to read what I say. You've got to reply to everything I post. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation in Gitmo is clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS uses a string of vulgarities so, why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more. Not sure about you or Larry. You are one of double standards, D'Plume. I take it you're not an equal opportunity condemner? Too bad for you. Why don't you plonk me? Oh, I know why... you've just got to read what I say. You've got to reply to everything I post. I don't read all of your posts, but are you saying you let your buddy JPS slide on his use of the word "****"? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation in Gitmo is clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS uses a string of vulgarities so, why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more. Not sure about you or Larry. You are one of double standards, D'Plume. I take it you're not an equal opportunity condemner? Too bad for you. Why don't you plonk me? Oh, I know why... you've just got to read what I say. You've got to reply to everything I post. I don't read all of your posts, but are you saying you let your buddy JPS slide on his use of the word "****"? ?? He never said that, at least I don't remember him saying it, and certainly not directed to me. What's your problem exactly? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 12:09*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message om... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation in Gitmo is clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS *uses a string of vulgarities *so, *why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of *profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more. Not sure about you or Larry. You *are one of double standards, D'Plume. *I take it you're not an equal opportunity condemner? Too bad for you. Why don't you plonk me? Oh, I know why... you've just got to read what I say. You've got to reply to everything I post. -- Nom=de=Plume Not every one of them, D'Plume. You flatter yourself. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Apr 10, 12:09 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message om... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plume wrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation in Gitmo is clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS uses a string of vulgarities so, why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more. Not sure about you or Larry. You are one of double standards, D'Plume. I take it you're not an equal opportunity condemner? Too bad for you. Why don't you plonk me? Oh, I know why... you've just got to read what I say. You've got to reply to everything I post. -- Nom=de=Plume Not every one of them, D'Plume. You flatter yourself. You're a liar. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 1:35*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 12:09 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message .... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plumewrote: wrote in message om... nom=de=plumewrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plumewrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 12:09*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Apr 9, 11:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plumewrote: wrote in message om... nom=de=plumewrote: wrote in message news ![]() nom=de=plumewrote: Or, maybe the reality is that it's difficult to do, which is the more simple and more obvious reason. But, feel free to believe what you want. Don't you think he would understand the implications before he made this his first proclamation over a year ago? Obviously not. Yet, he's still intent upon closing down the operation. I call it persistence in the face of hard problems. As the new POTUS he should have known. He was grandstanding. Were his advisers too busy digging into less important matters? Ah, so he's supposed to be all-knowing and all-seeing. I get it. Do you suppose there ?might? be more pressing matters? Like, say, just as a strawman, the MELTDOWN of the economy, caused by years of neglect and pimped by Bush for the previous 7 years? Or, maybe that millions go into foreclosure due to medical bills? Or, perhaps those two pesky wars, one of which was totally unjustified? I'm betting you cut GWB some slack, but not Obama. I wonder why? The situation inGitmois clear. He had no business running his mouth off with no intention of following through. Your second statement is evidence that you agree but there is no need to cut him "some slack" for incredibly poor judgment. This has nothing to do with GWB and his failures, or successes, so your deflection failed. Yet he's the President. I know this is hard for you to take, but it's a fact. He makes the decisions, not you. In Bush parlance, he's the decider. It has everything to do with GWB and his failures. He's the one who FAILED. Obama has yet to fail, but feel free to blame him. Yes, I'm giving him some slack. GWB screwed us over for 8 years. It's going to take a while to dig out. Ummm... did I miss something? You're posting about politics on a boating group. I'm responding. I've never started a political thread. You are also trying to avoid the conversation and spin it into something unrelated. I don't have time for those games. You're just a liar. If you don't have "time," why do you keep posting? Compare your posting history to mine and you will have your answer. When I do post I don't **** with people and try lame spins to suit my needs. I don't rant unlike you about things I know nothing about or am too lazy to research. Keep trying Larry. I'm sure you'll feel better if you use a few more swear words. -- Nom=de=Plume It never bothers you when JPS *uses a string of vulgarities *so, *why doe it bother you if Larry occasionally uses a word of *profanity, D'Plume? Untrue. I've called him on his language several times. The difference is that he's got half a brain or more...." I think you are finally realizing the key. "half a brain or more. " I would consider the former over the latter. Like yourself, D'Plume. He's not average. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Those pesky Republican racists | General | |||
Those pesky GOP'ers... | General | |||
newsgroup nutcases | General | |||
Those pesky liberals... | General | |||
Those pesky gal GI's again... | General |