|
Catamaran vs mono-hull
Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween
the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? It absolutely does. The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On Apr 2, 4:13*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. *The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. *This should give better fuel economy. *Does it? It absolutely does. * The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. * One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. *There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. Waht about harsh side winds? Can you flip one? |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On 4/2/10 6:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? It absolutely does. The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. Sorta depends upon the boats, their designs, their weights, and how they are used. For example, a 32' WorldCat, with two F250 Yamahas, weighs about 8000 pounds and at 4000 rpm produces 26.4 mph and burns 26.4 gph. A Scout with the same engines that weighs nearly a ton more burns about the same gph and produces a few more mph for the same fuel burn. Of course, the question was about mono and cat hulls for power boats, not "multi-hull sailboats," eh? -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On 4/2/10 6:30 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/2/10 6:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? It absolutely does. The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. Sorta depends upon the boats, their designs, their weights, and how they are used. For example, a 32' WorldCat, with two F250 Yamahas, weighs about 8000 pounds and at 4000 rpm produces 26.4 mph and burns 26.4 gph. A Scout with the same engines that weighs nearly a ton more burns about the same gph and produces a few more mph for the same fuel burn. Of course, the question was about mono and cat hulls for power boats, not "multi-hull sailboats," eh? Err, make that about 16.1 gph for the fuel burn on both boats... -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On 4/2/10 6:15 PM, Tim wrote:
On Apr 2, 4:13 pm, wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? It absolutely does. The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. Waht about harsh side winds? Can you flip one? Of course not: Foncia capsizes off Lorient – Alinghi crew safe [Source: Alinghi] AT 11:30 this morning, in 20 plus knots and a lumpy Atlantic swell, the 60ft trimaran Foncia capsized off Lorient with Alinghi sailors onboard. Of the 10 crew onboard, Piet van Niekerk and Francesco Rapetti were airlifted to hospital, both are safe and with no serious injuries. The rest of the crew along with consultant Alain Gautier were involved in securing the boat and towing it ashore, the sailors are shaken but unhurt. Ed Baird, who was onboard, provides some insight into what happened: “As we were bearing away, always the highest risk situation on a multi-hull, both the leeward and the central hull dug into the water and the rudders came out. From then it was out of our hands and we capsized forwards. As the mast hit the water, it broke, followed by the rear beam.” He continues: “The crew reacted very quickly in getting everyone back on board, doing a head count and checking injuries before calling for help and beginning to secure the boat.” Foncia is currently being towed into the harbour upside down to be craned out and assessed for damage. “We have all been through crashes and capsizes before, this is all part of the sport,” says Ed Baird, adding “however this is a temporary situation with Foncia and is not our equipment, so it is even more disappointing to us that we are involved in damaging someone else’s gear. We have learned a valuable lesson here and now must get to work to fix things up for Alain [Gautier].” Of course, this was a trimaran...but... -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
Tim wrote:
On Apr 2, 4:13 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? It absolutely does. The less water you push aside the better from the standpoint of efficiency. One of the big cruising trends we are seeing this year is the increase in multi-hull sailboats. There are hundreds of them just here in Martinique and it looks like they will be in the majority sooner or later. Waht about harsh side winds? Can you flip one? Doubtful where you'll be boating. If winds get 30-50 knots while you're out on the river, the bimini will probably rip before it can lift a toon. If it's too windy for the bimini, take it down. Wind will push you much more than a keeled boat, but one of the fuel advantages of the pontoons is not pushing water aside. Wind can work for you, or against you more in a pontoon boat than a deeper keeled boat. Jim - Likes to talk about boats when not hammering libs. |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article 7cf25d85-8cc3-4fdf-bb0e-b98d1839e364 @r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, says... Something I noticed on this leg of my cruise is the radical diff tween the wakes of mono and catamaran hulls for power boats. The monos have huge wakes while the cats have very small wakes. This should give better fuel economy. Does it? Is it possible that the two hulls each have half of the wake of a similar weight monohull? Effectively, it should do half the damage to the shoreline, but pound for pound I don't think it should make a huge difference in total drag assuming the hulls were all similar in design and function... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v On a planing hull, maybe not much difference in fuel burn, but still have to move water. On a displacement hull, thedifference will be dramatic. Yoou have pretty much effectively double the hull length, giving a higher hull speed. This should add both performance and fuel economy. |
Catamaran vs mono-hull
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:35:35 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote: On a planing hull, maybe not much difference in fuel burn, but still have to move water. On a displacement hull, thedifference will be dramatic. Yoou have pretty much effectively double the hull length, giving a higher hull speed. This should add both performance and fuel economy. The secret to catamaran efficiecy is light weight combined with a high length to width (beam) ratio. A typical ratio for either a displacement powerboat or sailboat is about 3:1. The hull of a catamaran however might be twice that or even greater. At high ratios the formula for hull speed goes out the window because wave making/hull drag is greatly reduced similar to what you'd experience with a canoe hull or a rowing shell. Basically you can think of it as being more streamlined. Naval architects refer to it as a lower prismatic coefficient. With regard to capsize issues, most cruising sail cats are under rigged with short masts and small sails. That greatly decreases the liklihood of becoming overpowered in a wind gust. I've never heard of a power cat capsizing but it certainly could happen with the right wave conditions, as it can with any other powerboat. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com