| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OOOps. Loog..
Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I
have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you .... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
OOOps. Loog..
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty It's nice that you admitted you were wrong. Thanks. -- Nom=de=Plume |
OOOps. Loog..
I am Tosk wrote:
Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. |
OOOps. Loog..
In article , says...
I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
OOOps. Loog..
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty Tom, AKA Jim doesn't think so. |
OOOps. Loog..
On Apr 1, 7:54*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Fair and balanced??? I don't think I've EVER heard you say anything negative about conservatives, and very, very few good things about liberals. You tend to lump every liberal in a small narrow venue, but then say that conservatives are broad minded. I didn't run, and never have run, from anything. What has happened is that when I ask you a question, you reply with another question as opposed to answering. Now, show me ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I've ever mentioned Tim McVeigh. |
OOOps. Loog..
Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 1, 7:54 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Fair and balanced??? I don't think I've EVER heard you say anything negative about conservatives, and very, very few good things about liberals. You tend to lump every liberal in a small narrow venue, but then say that conservatives are broad minded. I didn't run, and never have run, from anything. What has happened is that when I ask you a question, you reply with another question as opposed to answering. Now, show me ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I've ever mentioned Tim McVeigh. That's a dodge Loogy, and you know it. I've got you 17 unanswered questions behind Scotty. He's been patient as hell, and you know that. Can you just answer the damn questions? Jim - Now I know why you don't ask a lib how many libs it takes to change a light build. You won't get a damn answer. |
OOOps. Loog..
On Apr 1, 9:11*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 7:54 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says.... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Fair and balanced??? I don't think I've EVER heard you say anything negative about conservatives, and very, very few good things about liberals. You tend to lump every liberal in a small narrow venue, but then say that conservatives are broad minded. I didn't run, and never have run, from anything. What has happened is that when I ask you a question, you reply with another question as opposed to answering. Now, show me ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I've ever mentioned Tim McVeigh. That's a dodge Loogy, and you know it. I've got you 17 unanswered questions behind Scotty. He's been patient as hell, and you know that. Can you just answer the damn questions? Jim - Now I know why you don't ask a lib how many libs it takes to change a light build. *You won't get a damn answer.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. |
OOOps. Loog..
On Apr 1, 8:58*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 1, 7:54*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Fair and balanced??? I don't think I've EVER heard you say anything negative about conservatives, and very, very few good things about liberals. Obviously then, you are not paying attention or have selective memory. Scotty You tend to lump every liberal in a small narrow venue, but then say that conservatives are broad minded. I didn't run, and never have run, from anything. What has happened is that when I ask you a question, you reply with another question as opposed to answering. Absolute bull****. I re-posted several times the whole conversation last week where I answered your question about weather I approved of the right's threats, I answered directly with a resounding "NO" and then followed up with a direct question about the steps of congress and you ducked it at least a dozen times.. Period. That was only one of the three questions I asked you after "directly" ansering your questions. Now, show me ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I've ever mentioned Tim McVeigh OK, maybe "you" didn't, there, another admittal because I am honest and interested in read debate. Not stuck behind an ideology, never being able to admit a mistake, a bad move by dems, or answer a question that does not support your ideology as we will see below later I suppose... Anyway, here is the origional question, my answer, and the question posed to you. This is the last chance you get to either answer, or run, your choice. Note, I directly answer your question, and follow up with one of my own... Read it and answer, or run... [SNIP] I knew even you couldn't address the above setups and frauds.. No problem, I know there is really no excuse or justification. Scotty Again, I am the originator of the thread. I know what it says. Do you think it's quite acceptable for the teabagger sorts to call federal politicians and threaten there lives? Do you think it's good behavior for them to throw bricks through dems offices? If it's okay, then would it be okay if democratic protesters did it to republicans? OK, my answer is a resounding NO! How's that? I answered your question. We do know of convicted democratic operatives bombing democratic offices to try to put the blame on republicans. I heard the alleged voice to one of the congressmen. First off, it was definitely read from a script, and with the amount of vulgar language and silly juvenile, emo, insults, I would give the odds of it being a democrat at the end of the phone line, a good 50/50 if not better. Conservative radicals don't get sappy or emo, that is a lib thing. Consider this, if they wanted to *really* find the callers, they could do it in minutes. Why aren't we seeing (with all respect to Froggy) the Frog Hops on the TV? Hummmmm... right... that's what I thought. But now answer my question. Is there proof that this is republicans doing this, or in your intolerant, bigoted words, "teabagger sorts"? By your own bar, I am looking for criminal convictions and nothing less. I know the minority media is running with the ball but until you provide that, your thread is based on nothing but allegations and sensationalism. You are whipping up unprovoked hate for republicans by suggesting with no good reason that this is republicans doing this when the only good evidence via convictions in this arena, is democrats... And just so we don't get off track. I answered your question, now answer mine. Is there proof that this is republicans doing this, or in your intolerant, bigoted words, "teabagger sorts"? By your own bar, I am looking for criminal convictions and nothing less. Scotty [/SNIP] Ok, Loog, answer, or run? Scotty Scotty ..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can also prove I have answered no less than 4 of your questions since then, and admitted two mistakes I made in posting. (of course now that more is coming out about the exploration and shut down plan Obama came out with, I was not as wrong as I thought... Scotty answer, or run? |
OOOps. Loog..
On Apr 1, 10:31*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Apr 1, 8:58*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 7:54*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says.... I am Tosk wrote: Guess there is some limited drilling in there. Good on Obama. So now I have admitted I made a mistake, you should take notes, and said something good about the Obama announcement so now again, I makes you ... Well, I will let you spin it any way you want. Scotty crickets Jim - Waiting for Loogy to admit that Scotty is fair and balanced. Always will be, I have gotten back to political posts the last few weeks but found that the same old same old stays. I answer question after question for Loogie, and he deflects and avoids each and every question asked of him. I asked him three seperate questions the last week, only after answering his, and all three, he ran from... I am done again, can't find a responsible debate here with the left.. Just prove a negative crap and deflection, oh and lets talk about Tim McVeigh, that is relevant to todays situation, NOT! Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Fair and balanced??? I don't think I've EVER heard you say anything negative about conservatives, and very, very few good things about liberals. Obviously then, you are not paying attention or have selective memory. Scotty You tend to lump every liberal in a small narrow venue, but then say that conservatives are broad minded. I didn't run, and never have run, from anything. What has happened is that when I ask you a question, you reply with another question as opposed to answering. Absolute bull****. I re-posted several times the whole conversation last week where I answered your question about weather I approved of the right's threats, I answered directly with a resounding "NO" and then followed up with a direct question about the steps of congress and you ducked it at least a dozen times.. Period. That was only one of the three questions I asked you after "directly" ansering your questions. Now, show me ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I've ever mentioned Tim McVeigh OK, maybe "you" didn't, there, another admittal because I am honest and interested in read debate. Not stuck behind an ideology, never being able to admit a mistake, a bad move by dems, or answer a question that does not support your ideology as we will see below later I suppose... Anyway, here is the origional question, my answer, and the question posed to you. This is the last chance you get to either answer, or run, your choice. Note, I directly answer your question, and follow up with one of my own... Read it and answer, or run... [SNIP] I knew even you couldn't address the above setups and frauds.. No problem, I know there is really no excuse or justification. Scotty Again, I am the originator of the thread. I know what it says. Do you think it's quite acceptable for the teabagger sorts to call federal politicians and threaten there lives? Do you think it's good behavior for them to throw bricks through dems offices? If it's okay, then would it be okay if democratic protesters did it to republicans? OK, my answer is a resounding NO! How's that? I answered your question. We do know of convicted democratic operatives bombing democratic offices to try to put the blame on republicans. I heard the alleged voice to one of the congressmen. First off, it was definitely read from a script, and with the amount of vulgar language and silly juvenile, emo, insults, I would give the odds of it being a democrat at the end of the phone line, a good 50/50 if not better. Conservative radicals don't get sappy or emo, that is a lib thing. Consider this, if they wanted to *really* find the callers, they could do it in minutes. Why aren't we seeing (with all respect to Froggy) the Frog Hops on the TV? Hummmmm... right... that's what I thought. Cite? You have no evidence of the above, I'm betting...... But now answer my question. Is there proof that this is republicans doing this, or in your intolerant, bigoted words, "teabagger sorts"? By your own bar, I am looking for criminal convictions and nothing less. I know the minority media is running with the ball but until you provide that, your thread is based on nothing but allegations and sensationalism. You are whipping up unprovoked hate for republicans by suggesting with no good reason that this is republicans doing this when the only good evidence via convictions in this arena, is democrats... And just so we don't get off track. I answered your question, now answer mine. Is there proof that this is republicans doing this, or in your intolerant, bigoted words, "teabagger sorts"? By your own bar, I am looking for criminal convictions and nothing less. Scotty [/SNIP] Ok, Loog, answer, or run? It's not "my bar" to say someone has to be convicted of something in order for them to have done something. Only if it's criminal activity. To make it simple, let's say that you admitted that you took a handgun to a town hall type meeting, and had a CCW permit to do so. Perfectly legal, ergo no "conviction". But does that make it less of an unhinged, whacked out way to go about things? Scotty Scotty .- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can also prove I have answered no less than 4 of your questions since then, and admitted two mistakes I made in posting. (of course now that more is coming out about the exploration and shut down plan Obama came out with, I was not as wrong as I thought... Scotty answer, or run?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com