In article ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:56:37 -0400, hk
wrote:

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.

Fraud? I thought the guy had accessed a database to check out the
criminal record of an ex-wife's new guy?


--

Dunno, the Snooze Press article I looked at seemed to be concentrating
on preferences used to get government contracts.
I really didn't care enough either way to dwell on it.
If everyone who fudged on government contracts went to jail the I-270
corridor in Montgomery County would still be lined with farm land.

The guy who looked up the ex's new boy friend pulled his nomination a
while ago. The new guy, a retired Major General pulled his nomination
just before the Senate went on recess. It seems there was a contract
dispute.

All of Obama's nominees have problems, taxes, fraud, corruption, it's
the Obama way.

On 3/30/10 5:37 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:56:37 -0400,
wrote:

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.

Fraud? I thought the guy had accessed a database to check out the
criminal record of an ex-wife's new guy?


--

Dunno, the Snooze Press article I looked at seemed to be concentrating
on preferences used to get government contracts.
I really didn't care enough either way to dwell on it.
If everyone who fudged on government contracts went to jail the I-270
corridor in Montgomery County would still be lined with farm land.

The guy who looked up the ex's new boy friend pulled his nomination a
while ago. The new guy, a retired Major General pulled his nomination
just before the Senate went on recess. It seems there was a contract
dispute.

All of Obama's nominees have problems, taxes, fraud, corruption, it's
the Obama way.



All Obama's nominees together don't add up to a tenth of the corruption
of Dicque Cheney.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:44:11 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400,
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask
if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week...

Scotty


Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing
same?

If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar.

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.

Mentioning DeMint and common sense in the same sentence lacks common
sense. He's a Naughtsi. Broken clock is right twice a day.

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400,
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask
if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week...

Scotty


Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing
same?

If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar.

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.


It's really time for Rangel to go. He's been an institution in Congress for
way too long. That said, there issue isn't so much guys going to bars to
watch naked women (or men or whatever). The issue is the hypocrisy of
claiming the family values mantle and getting caught at such bars.

Nothing wrong with asking questions. That's not what happened with the first
nominee however.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400,
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask
if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week...

Scotty


Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing
same?

If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar.

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.

It's the Senate's job to confirm.
DeMint is a wacko. "Waterloo" indeed.
The TSA appointee's withdrawal was due to "fraud" only as much as you
want to call the DC revolving door system of government fraud.
And that's an apt description to me.
Too bad the individuals involved think they are "honorable" themselves.
They can't see the forest for the trees.

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:18:04 -0500, Peter Prick
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400,
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask
if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week...

Scotty


Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing
same?

If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar.

BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee
that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud
charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions.

It's the Senate's job to confirm.
DeMint is a wacko. "Waterloo" indeed.
The TSA appointee's withdrawal was due to "fraud" only as much as you
want to call the DC revolving door system of government fraud.
And that's an apt description to me.
Too bad the individuals involved think they are "honorable" themselves.
They can't see the forest for the trees.

Boomerang Waterloo. Whoops.

On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when
Steele decided to take them to the boob bar?

In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4
@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when
Steele decided to take them to the boob bar?

Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and
run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions...

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

On 3/30/10 8:18 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4
@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400,
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when
Steele decided to take them to the boob bar?

Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and
run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions...

Scotty



That titty bar is hiring, snooty. You could get a job there parking
cars...maybe.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Mar 30, 8:18*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4
@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...



On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk
wrote:

RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin

Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers
and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads.

The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when
Steele decided to take them to the boob bar?

Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and
run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions...

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?