![]() |
Cha-ching!
|
Cha-ching!
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? Snotty doesn't understand how the blame game works. Although he's good at reading the scrolling misinformation on the Fox News Channel -- Obama the Antichrist? Pelosi a Man? Reid an Alien? Rove a Democrat? You don't need any proof to ask a question. Republican smear tactics. |
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 2:18 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:56:24 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. There are so many bright sides of this, it's like a kaleidoscope. The organization responsible for the get together were a bunch of young (under 45) rich conservatives tasked with bringing in a new generation of concerned conservatives to the money pool. Maybe that titty bar will hire SnottyScotty to work as a valet parker...if he is tall enough to see through the windshields of the guests' cars... -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Cha-ching!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. Hahahahaha!!! Great point! Spend on Republicans... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cha-ching!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. It's really time for Rangel to go. He's been an institution in Congress for way too long. That said, there issue isn't so much guys going to bars to watch naked women (or men or whatever). The issue is the hypocrisy of claiming the family values mantle and getting caught at such bars. Nothing wrong with asking questions. That's not what happened with the first nominee however. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cha-ching!
|
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 5:37 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:56:37 -0400, wrote: BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. Fraud? I thought the guy had accessed a database to check out the criminal record of an ex-wife's new guy? -- Dunno, the Snooze Press article I looked at seemed to be concentrating on preferences used to get government contracts. I really didn't care enough either way to dwell on it. If everyone who fudged on government contracts went to jail the I-270 corridor in Montgomery County would still be lined with farm land. The guy who looked up the ex's new boy friend pulled his nomination a while ago. The new guy, a retired Major General pulled his nomination just before the Senate went on recess. It seems there was a contract dispute. All of Obama's nominees have problems, taxes, fraud, corruption, it's the Obama way. All Obama's nominees together don't add up to a tenth of the corruption of Dicque Cheney. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cha-ching!
In article ,
says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. It's the Senate's job to confirm. DeMint is a wacko. "Waterloo" indeed. The TSA appointee's withdrawal was due to "fraud" only as much as you want to call the DC revolving door system of government fraud. And that's an apt description to me. Too bad the individuals involved think they are "honorable" themselves. They can't see the forest for the trees. |
Cha-ching!
In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4
@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com