|
Cha-ching!
RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spending
By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, March 30, 2010; A01 The Republican National Committee and its chairman, Michael S. Steele, were engulfed in controversy again Monday after new financial reports showed that the party used tens of thousands of donor dollars for luxe hotels, private jets and other questionable expenditures. The disclosures, some of which stem from Steele's travels to California in January and a subsequent RNC retreat to Hawaii, reignited criticism from fellow Republicans who are troubled by the chairman's financial stewardship of the GOP's main committee since he took over more than a year ago. Although it is not unusual for either party to spend money in tony settings to cater to wealthy donors, the RNC's latest filings captured widespread attention for one expenditure at a risque nightclub: $1,946.25 for "meals" at Voyeur in West Hollywood, which features topless dancers wearing horse bridles and other bondage gear while mimicking sex acts. The committee fired an unidentified staff member as a result of the disbursement and emphasized Monday that Steele had not visited the club and was not aware of the expenditure. The reimbursement went to Erik Brown, a Southern California GOP donor who has spent time with Steele in the past and whose marketing firm has earned more than $160,000 from the RNC and other Republican committees, according to campaign disclosure records. The RNC's expenses, first highlighted by the Daily Caller, set off another round of GOP infighting over Steele, whose combative style and frequent pratfalls have earned him friends and enemies. The chairman angered many party insiders by releasing a book this year without notifying Republican leaders; he stumbled into another controversy this month after the leak of an RNC fundraising document featuring crude caricatures of President Obama and other Democratic leaders. Steele also has come under fire for his management of the organization's finances. The RNC had more than $22 million on hand when he arrived last year, but is down to less than $10 million, despite raising a record $96 million during that time, records show. The February report to the Federal Election Commission lists $17,000 for private jet service; more than $35,000 for upscale hotels; and more than $43,000 in expenses, not including airfare, for the committee's winter meeting in Hawaii. Such reports include a range of spending, including Steele's airfare as well as expenses incurred by staff members and outsiders. "The RNC's role, and thus the chairman's role, is to raise money, fund candidates, recruit candidates and voters into our cause," said John Weaver, a GOP strategist and former adviser to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). "Setting policy, choosing sides and crazy spending does not fall under his job description." Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta, said that spending so lavishly during an economic downturn is "mind-boggling." "Virtually the entire country -- from big businesses to small business -- had to make cutbacks," he said. "To think the Republican Party wouldn't do the same thing, I think, suggests either a tone-deafness or just that they don't care, which would maybe be worse." But others defended Steele and his financial record and pointed to GOP success in recent elections in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia. "You do have to spend money to raise money," said Dick Wadhams, chairman of the Colorado GOP. "I'll give Chairman Steele the benefit of the doubt on spending on major donors." An RNC investigation of the incident found that the Voyeur party was attended by a group of young Republicans who had been at an official party "Young Eagles" event at the Beverly Hills Hotel the same night, according to an internal memo obtained by The Washington Post. The Young Eagles is an RNC program to cultivate 30-to-40-year-olds as major future donors. The request for reimbursement was then submitted on behalf of Brown by an unidentified RNC staffer who "was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject," according to the memo, which was written by the committee chief of staff, Ken McKay. The staffer was fired because of the incident, the memo said. RNC spokesman Doug Heye said Monday night that "appropriate personnel actions have been taken, and accounting and reimbursement processes are being revised to ensure that such an action cannot reoccur." He also said Brown would return the payment. "We recognize the difficulty this incident has caused and assure our members and supporters that any necessary and proper remediation is being implemented immediately," Heye said. The Democratic National Committee said that its chairman, Timothy M. Kaine, usually travels on commercial flights and does not generally use limousine or town-car services. "We think their extravagant spending and their high burn rate speaks for itself," spokesman Brad Woodhouse said. But Heye noted that paying for high-end hotels and other accoutrements is standard practice for both political parties when wooing wealthy donors. He said most of the expenses for the private jets and car services for Steele detailed in the February reports were related to the start of television advertisements in the South and Midwest. Brown, the chief executive of Dynamic Marketing, which has offices in California and the District, did not respond Monday to telephone and e-mail messages. He has contributed $10,000 to GOP candidates and committees since 2007, and wrote on Twitter last Oct. 26 about attending a Monday-night football game at FedEx Field with Steele. Voyeur attracted celebrities such as Lindsay Lohan and Leonardo DiCaprio to its fall opening. Club managers did not respond to telephone messages left Monday. *** Article is funny enough, but this line cracks me up: "Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta..." Jesus has a PR man!CGOPG -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Cha-ching!
hk wrote:
Article is funny enough, but this line cracks me up: "Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta..." Jesus has a PR man!CGOPG Cracked up? |
Cha-ching!
On Mar 30, 6:57*am, hk wrote:
RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spending By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, March 30, 2010; A01 The Republican National Committee and its chairman, Michael S. Steele, were engulfed in controversy again Monday after new financial reports showed that the party used tens of thousands of donor dollars for luxe hotels, private jets and other questionable expenditures. The disclosures, some of which stem from Steele's travels to California in January and a subsequent RNC retreat to Hawaii, reignited criticism from fellow Republicans who are troubled by the chairman's financial stewardship of the GOP's main committee since he took over more than a year ago. Although it is not unusual for either party to spend money in tony settings to cater to wealthy donors, the RNC's latest filings captured widespread attention for one expenditure at a risque nightclub: $1,946.25 for "meals" at Voyeur in West Hollywood, which features topless dancers wearing horse bridles and other bondage gear while mimicking sex acts. The committee fired an unidentified staff member as a result of the disbursement and emphasized Monday that Steele had not visited the club and was not aware of the expenditure. The reimbursement went to Erik Brown, a Southern California GOP donor who has spent time with Steele in the past and whose marketing firm has earned more than $160,000 from the RNC and other Republican committees, according to campaign disclosure records. The RNC's expenses, first highlighted by the Daily Caller, set off another round of GOP infighting over Steele, whose combative style and frequent pratfalls have earned him friends and enemies. The chairman angered many party insiders by releasing a book this year without notifying Republican leaders; he stumbled into another controversy this month after the leak of an RNC fundraising document featuring crude caricatures of President Obama and other Democratic leaders. Steele also has come under fire for his management of the organization's finances. The RNC had more than $22 million on hand when he arrived last year, but is down to less than $10 million, despite raising a record $96 million during that time, records show. The February report to the Federal Election Commission lists $17,000 for private jet service; more than $35,000 for upscale hotels; and more than $43,000 in expenses, not including airfare, for the committee's winter meeting in Hawaii. Such reports include a range of spending, including Steele's airfare as well as expenses incurred by staff members and outsiders. "The RNC's role, and thus the chairman's role, is to raise money, fund candidates, recruit candidates and voters into our cause," said John Weaver, a GOP strategist and former adviser to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). "Setting policy, choosing sides and crazy spending does not fall under his job description." Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta, said that spending so lavishly during an economic downturn is "mind-boggling." "Virtually the entire country -- from big businesses to small business -- had to make cutbacks," he said. "To think the Republican Party wouldn't do the same thing, I think, suggests either a tone-deafness or just that they don't care, which would maybe be worse." But others defended Steele and his financial record and pointed to GOP success in recent elections in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia. "You do have to spend money to raise money," said Dick Wadhams, chairman of the Colorado GOP. "I'll give Chairman Steele the benefit of the doubt on spending on major donors." An RNC investigation of the incident found that the Voyeur party was attended by a group of young Republicans who had been at an official party "Young Eagles" event at the Beverly Hills Hotel the same night, according to an internal memo obtained by The Washington Post. The Young Eagles is an RNC program to cultivate 30-to-40-year-olds as major future donors. The request for reimbursement was then submitted on behalf of Brown by an unidentified RNC staffer who "was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject," according to the memo, which was written by the committee chief of staff, Ken McKay. The staffer was fired because of the incident, the memo said. RNC spokesman Doug Heye said Monday night that "appropriate personnel actions have been taken, and accounting and reimbursement processes are being revised to ensure that such an action cannot reoccur." He also said Brown would return the payment. "We recognize the difficulty this incident has caused and assure our members and supporters that any necessary and proper remediation is being implemented immediately," Heye said. The Democratic National Committee said that its chairman, Timothy M. Kaine, usually travels on commercial flights and does not generally use limousine or town-car services. "We think their extravagant spending and their high burn rate speaks for itself," spokesman Brad Woodhouse said. But Heye noted that paying for high-end hotels and other accoutrements is standard practice for both political parties when wooing wealthy donors. He said most of the expenses for the private jets and car services for Steele detailed in the February reports were related to the start of television advertisements in the South and Midwest. Brown, the chief executive of Dynamic Marketing, which has offices in California and the District, did not respond Monday to telephone and e-mail messages. He has contributed $10,000 to GOP candidates and committees since 2007, and wrote on Twitter last Oct. 26 about attending a Monday-night football game at FedEx Field with Steele. Voyeur attracted celebrities such as Lindsay Lohan and Leonardo DiCaprio to its fall opening. Club managers did not respond to telephone messages left Monday. *** Article is funny enough, but this line cracks me up: "Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta..." Jesus has a PR man!CGOPG -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. Man, now there are liberals pretending to be Chairman of the RNC just to make the conservatives look bad? |
Cha-ching!
|
Cha-ching!
On Mar 30, 10:08*am, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 013359d4-37ba-4331-a09c- , says... On Mar 30, 6:57*am, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spending By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, March 30, 2010; A01 The Republican National Committee and its chairman, Michael S. Steele, were engulfed in controversy again Monday after new financial reports showed that the party used tens of thousands of donor dollars for luxe hotels, private jets and other questionable expenditures. The disclosures, some of which stem from Steele's travels to California in January and a subsequent RNC retreat to Hawaii, reignited criticism from fellow Republicans who are troubled by the chairman's financial stewardship of the GOP's main committee since he took over more than a year ago. Although it is not unusual for either party to spend money in tony settings to cater to wealthy donors, the RNC's latest filings captured widespread attention for one expenditure at a risque nightclub: $1,946.25 for "meals" at Voyeur in West Hollywood, which features topless dancers wearing horse bridles and other bondage gear while mimicking sex acts. The committee fired an unidentified staff member as a result of the disbursement and emphasized Monday that Steele had not visited the club and was not aware of the expenditure. The reimbursement went to Erik Brown, a Southern California GOP donor who has spent time with Steele in the past and whose marketing firm has earned more than $160,000 from the RNC and other Republican committees, according to campaign disclosure records. The RNC's expenses, first highlighted by the Daily Caller, set off another round of GOP infighting over Steele, whose combative style and frequent pratfalls have earned him friends and enemies. The chairman angered many party insiders by releasing a book this year without notifying Republican leaders; he stumbled into another controversy this month after the leak of an RNC fundraising document featuring crude caricatures of President Obama and other Democratic leaders. Steele also has come under fire for his management of the organization's finances. The RNC had more than $22 million on hand when he arrived last year, but is down to less than $10 million, despite raising a record $96 million during that time, records show. The February report to the Federal Election Commission lists $17,000 for private jet service; more than $35,000 for upscale hotels; and more than $43,000 in expenses, not including airfare, for the committee's winter meeting in Hawaii. Such reports include a range of spending, including Steele's airfare as well as expenses incurred by staff members and outsiders. "The RNC's role, and thus the chairman's role, is to raise money, fund candidates, recruit candidates and voters into our cause," said John Weaver, a GOP strategist and former adviser to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). "Setting policy, choosing sides and crazy spending does not fall under his job description." Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta, said that spending so lavishly during an economic downturn is "mind-boggling." "Virtually the entire country -- from big businesses to small business -- had to make cutbacks," he said. "To think the Republican Party wouldn't do the same thing, I think, suggests either a tone-deafness or just that they don't care, which would maybe be worse." But others defended Steele and his financial record and pointed to GOP success in recent elections in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia.. "You do have to spend money to raise money," said Dick Wadhams, chairman of the Colorado GOP. "I'll give Chairman Steele the benefit of the doubt on spending on major donors." An RNC investigation of the incident found that the Voyeur party was attended by a group of young Republicans who had been at an official party "Young Eagles" event at the Beverly Hills Hotel the same night, according to an internal memo obtained by The Washington Post. The Young Eagles is an RNC program to cultivate 30-to-40-year-olds as major future donors. The request for reimbursement was then submitted on behalf of Brown by an unidentified RNC staffer who "was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject," according to the memo, which was written by the committee chief of staff, Ken McKay. The staffer was fired because of the incident, the memo said. RNC spokesman Doug Heye said Monday night that "appropriate personnel actions have been taken, and accounting and reimbursement processes are being revised to ensure that such an action cannot reoccur." He also said Brown would return the payment. "We recognize the difficulty this incident has caused and assure our members and supporters that any necessary and proper remediation is being implemented immediately," Heye said. The Democratic National Committee said that its chairman, Timothy M. Kaine, usually travels on commercial flights and does not generally use limousine or town-car services. "We think their extravagant spending and their high burn rate speaks for itself," spokesman Brad Woodhouse said. But Heye noted that paying for high-end hotels and other accoutrements is standard practice for both political parties when wooing wealthy donors. He said most of the expenses for the private jets and car services for Steele detailed in the February reports were related to the start of television advertisements in the South and Midwest. Brown, the chief executive of Dynamic Marketing, which has offices in California and the District, did not respond Monday to telephone and e-mail messages. He has contributed $10,000 to GOP candidates and committees since 2007, and wrote on Twitter last Oct. 26 about attending a Monday-night football game at FedEx Field with Steele. Voyeur attracted celebrities such as Lindsay Lohan and Leonardo DiCaprio to its fall opening. Club managers did not respond to telephone messages left Monday. *** Article is funny enough, but this line cracks me up: "Mark DeMoss, a major RNC donor during George W. Bush's presidency who heads a Christian public-relations firm in Atlanta..." Jesus has a PR man!CGOPG -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. Man, now there are liberals pretending to be Chairman of the RNC just to make the conservatives look bad? Yup, everythigng repub bad, everything dem good.. But still you won't answer three simple questions because you don't like the answer... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You think the above is a GOOD thing? |
Cha-ching!
In article ,
says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 11:44 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. Fraud? I thought the guy had accessed a database to check out the criminal record of an ex-wife's new guy? -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Cha-ching!
On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? |
Cha-ching!
|
Cha-ching!
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk
wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? Snotty doesn't understand how the blame game works. Although he's good at reading the scrolling misinformation on the Fox News Channel -- Obama the Antichrist? Pelosi a Man? Reid an Alien? Rove a Democrat? You don't need any proof to ask a question. Republican smear tactics. |
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 2:18 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:56:24 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. There are so many bright sides of this, it's like a kaleidoscope. The organization responsible for the get together were a bunch of young (under 45) rich conservatives tasked with bringing in a new generation of concerned conservatives to the money pool. Maybe that titty bar will hire SnottyScotty to work as a valet parker...if he is tall enough to see through the windshields of the guests' cars... -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. |
Cha-ching!
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:44:11 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. Mentioning DeMint and common sense in the same sentence lacks common sense. He's a Naughtsi. Broken clock is right twice a day. |
Cha-ching!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. Hahahahaha!!! Great point! Spend on Republicans... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cha-ching!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. It's really time for Rangel to go. He's been an institution in Congress for way too long. That said, there issue isn't so much guys going to bars to watch naked women (or men or whatever). The issue is the hypocrisy of claiming the family values mantle and getting caught at such bars. Nothing wrong with asking questions. That's not what happened with the first nominee however. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cha-ching!
|
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 5:37 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:56:37 -0400, wrote: BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. Fraud? I thought the guy had accessed a database to check out the criminal record of an ex-wife's new guy? -- Dunno, the Snooze Press article I looked at seemed to be concentrating on preferences used to get government contracts. I really didn't care enough either way to dwell on it. If everyone who fudged on government contracts went to jail the I-270 corridor in Montgomery County would still be lined with farm land. The guy who looked up the ex's new boy friend pulled his nomination a while ago. The new guy, a retired Major General pulled his nomination just before the Senate went on recess. It seems there was a contract dispute. All of Obama's nominees have problems, taxes, fraud, corruption, it's the Obama way. All Obama's nominees together don't add up to a tenth of the corruption of Dicque Cheney. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cha-ching!
In article ,
says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. It's the Senate's job to confirm. DeMint is a wacko. "Waterloo" indeed. The TSA appointee's withdrawal was due to "fraud" only as much as you want to call the DC revolving door system of government fraud. And that's an apt description to me. Too bad the individuals involved think they are "honorable" themselves. They can't see the forest for the trees. |
Cha-ching!
In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4
@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Cha-ching!
On 3/30/10 8:18 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty That titty bar is hiring, snooty. You could get a job there parking cars...maybe. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cha-ching!
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:18:04 -0500, Peter Prick
wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:15:08 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/30/10 11:13 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. I saw some poor sucker on MSNBC this morning trying to be fair and ask if both sides do this. Poor guy, bet he doesn't have a job next week... Scotty Both sides do what, Snotty? Go to titty bars or get reimbursed for doing same? If you are Rangel you just get comped at the titty bar. BTW I am surprised nobody here said anything about the TSA appointee that has suddenly withdrawn his name form consideration over fraud charges., Maybe Demint was right to ask questions. It's the Senate's job to confirm. DeMint is a wacko. "Waterloo" indeed. The TSA appointee's withdrawal was due to "fraud" only as much as you want to call the DC revolving door system of government fraud. And that's an apt description to me. Too bad the individuals involved think they are "honorable" themselves. They can't see the forest for the trees. Boomerang Waterloo. Whoops. |
Cha-ching!
On Mar 30, 8:18*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar? |
Cha-ching!
Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar? Do you have something against titty bars? I hear they can be great motivating tools. |
Cha-ching!
On Apr 1, 9:38*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:18*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... |
Cha-ching!
In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@
35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56*am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Cha-ching!
On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? |
Cha-ching!
Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 1, 11:23 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Are we talking millions, billions, or trillions spent? Or is it a "family values" issue? Did anyone get shot or spit on? This could be a major story. I'll get right on it. Should be good for at least 40 pages. |
Cha-ching!
In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8-
, says... On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Cha-ching!
On Apr 1, 12:50*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such. |
Cha-ching!
On Apr 1, 1:28*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 1, 12:50*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Doesn't matter really, it's just another in the long list of questions I have answered directly for you and still you have ducked and dodged my one question over and over again because your ideology won't allow you to and you can't get by that... Anyway, I will not be addressing your questions anymore,... Scotty Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Cha-ching!
On Apr 1, 1:57*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Apr 1, 1:28*pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 12:50*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says.... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions.... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Doesn't matter really, it's just another in the long list of questions I have answered directly for you and still you have ducked and dodged my one question over and over again because your ideology won't allow you to and you can't get by that... Anyway, I will not be addressing your questions anymore,... Scotty Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No you didn't answer my question at all. What "dems" spent taxpayer's money taking high rollers to tit bars? Do you have ANY evidence of such? Seems as though every time you make an excuse when someone points out a failing of a conservative, it's something akin to *dems did it too*....and I ask for a cite and never seem to get it.... |
Cha-ching!
In article c21f2760-a69f-4c2b-8f4e-c313e4abd120@
8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 1:57*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Apr 1, 1:28*pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 12:50*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Doesn't matter really, it's just another in the long list of questions I have answered directly for you and still you have ducked and dodged my one question over and over again because your ideology won't allow you to and you can't get by that... Anyway, I will not be addressing your questions anymore,... Scotty Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No you didn't answer my question at all. What "dems" spent taxpayer's money taking high rollers to tit bars? Do you have ANY evidence of such? Seems as though every time you make an excuse when someone points out a failing of a conservative, it's something akin to *dems did it too*....and I ask for a cite and never seem to get it.... Whatever Loog, I have answered several of your questions, you won't even answer one of mine... Run along now, play your game with someone else.. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Cha-ching!
I am Tosk wrote:
In article c21f2760-a69f-4c2b-8f4e-c313e4abd120@ 8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 1:57 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Apr 1, 1:28 pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 12:50 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Doesn't matter really, it's just another in the long list of questions I have answered directly for you and still you have ducked and dodged my one question over and over again because your ideology won't allow you to and you can't get by that... Anyway, I will not be addressing your questions anymore,... Scotty Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No you didn't answer my question at all. What "dems" spent taxpayer's money taking high rollers to tit bars? Do you have ANY evidence of such? Seems as though every time you make an excuse when someone points out a failing of a conservative, it's something akin to *dems did it too*....and I ask for a cite and never seem to get it.... Whatever Loog, I have answered several of your questions, you won't even answer one of mine... Run along now, play your game with someone else.. Scotty It's even worse than him dodging your questions. Nineteen this month already, and it's only the first day of the month. You admitted mistakes more than once. The honorable path. Loogy, NEVER. Shows which side is honorable and which side is scum. Can we believe anything Loogy says? Only when he talks about Harry. That's all been confirmed. Maybe BBQ, smokehouses and beer. Maybe. But all of that can be copied from the internet. Remember when Loogy gave us a recipe he copied from the internet and said it was his personal recipe? I do. Isn't it funny how Loogy knows so much about Harry? Why is that? Ask yourself that question. Why is Loogy the guy who talks most with Harry? Why? Anybody met "Loogy" face to face? Jim - Saying "Loogy" might not be who we think he is. Just saying "might not be." If I'm proven wrong I will admit my mistake, as a matter of honor. |
Cha-ching!
In article , says...
I am Tosk wrote: In article c21f2760-a69f-4c2b-8f4e-c313e4abd120@ 8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 1:57 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Apr 1, 1:28 pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 1, 12:50 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article bad63893-3266-499d-9da8- , says... On Apr 1, 11:23 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 31d1f09f-8971-422c-8939-9af7e700d06c@ 35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Apr 1, 9:38 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 30, 8:18 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 6574e4ec-a904-4502-9e24-0b28bf2549d4 @b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 30, 10:56 am, wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:57:14 -0400, hk wrote: RNC expense report renews criticism about Steele's spendin Look at the bright side. Every dollar they squander on titty dancers and 4 star hotels can't be used to buy anti Obama ads. The RNC says no most of the time, wonder if any of them said no when Steele decided to take them to the boob bar? Wow, everything republican = bad, everything democrat = good... hit and run posting.. Shoot the talking point, duck the questions... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v You think it's a GOOD thing that Steele spent OUR money in a boob bar?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - crickets....... from the person who thinks that I should answer a question that is a response to a question.... I am waiting for you to answer my question. But just to prove I don't run, yes, I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do... Now, answer my other question, or run? Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - What "dems" have been caught using taxpayer's money in tit bars? Oh well... Sorry loogie, if I *am* going to debate here, it's gonna' be with someone who will reciprocate. later... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - Did you or did you not, when I asked if you thought it okay for conservatives to spend taxpayer money, as usual, try to change to liberal = bad by saying: "I think it's fine for them to meet in a titty bar for business, just like dems do..."????? Doesn't matter really, it's just another in the long list of questions I have answered directly for you and still you have ducked and dodged my one question over and over again because your ideology won't allow you to and you can't get by that... Anyway, I will not be addressing your questions anymore,... Scotty Well, you did. I just want to know what "dems" did that so that I can publicly denounce them for doing such.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No you didn't answer my question at all. What "dems" spent taxpayer's money taking high rollers to tit bars? Do you have ANY evidence of such? Seems as though every time you make an excuse when someone points out a failing of a conservative, it's something akin to *dems did it too*....and I ask for a cite and never seem to get it.... Whatever Loog, I have answered several of your questions, you won't even answer one of mine... Run along now, play your game with someone else.. Scotty It's even worse than him dodging your questions. Nineteen this month already, and it's only the first day of the month. You admitted mistakes more than once. The honorable path. Loogy, NEVER. HEY, COME BACK HERE AND SHOW ME WHERE I NEVER ADMITTED A MISTAKE!!! OR YOU ARE A LIAR. AND SHOW ME THAT A TREE DIDN'T FALL IN THE WOODS LAST NIGHT TOO WHILE YOU ARE AT IT!! Scotty Jim - Saying "Loogy" might not be who we think he is. Just saying "might not be." If I'm proven wrong I will admit my mistake, as a matter of honor. -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com