Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30/03/2010 12:32 AM, Larry wrote:
jps wrote: On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:12:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I think " necessary health care" and "subsidized health care insurance" are two different things. Eisboch No "other words" are needed. I believe health insurance or a national health plan should be mandatory, and if you legitimately cannot afford the insurance, it should be subsidized for you and your family to the degree necessary. The hang-up I still have is the difference between a mandatory health insurance program and the right to free or subsidized (tax supported) health care for life threatening or disabling conditions. Mandatory health insurance puts another massive layer of bureaucracy, private or government, into the mix. When it comes to getting care, that has never been a good thing. A mandatory health insurance law is in effect here in MA. For those who can't afford the subsidized insurance (state programs) it is cheaper to pay the fine (assuming the state even enforces the collection of them, which I doubt.) Tough call. I guess my attitude is that those of us that are fortunate enough to be able to afford decent health insurance also have a moral obligation to assist those who need medical care (though a tax or increased insurance premium) for those who cannot afford insurance. But to subsidize health *insurance* programs is another matter. Eisboch Are you suggesting that those that can afford it pay retail, but those who need subsidized care get it through some other method? Not sure I understand. The guy lays out a detailed plan to provide health care for all, and you bitch about it. Unless you have a better plan, quit criticizing. There are better plans. First point, why not have it's funding go into a seperate pool so people know the EXACT cost, why general revenue? Here is a hint, it isn't about health care, it is about government revenue and skiming. I could go on but it is a waste of time. Obama should have consulted people who have lived under multiple plans for extended periods of time for a good plan and anwer but like I said, it isn't about health care, it is about government revenue. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Martha Coakley: I will deny life saving treatment | General | |||
Olympic Coverage | General | |||
Katrina coverage | General |