Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
jps wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:34:43 -0500, Larry wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 28/03/2010 3:34 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message news Democrats Defend Appointments By JOSEPH BERGER A leading Republican predicted Sunday that President Obama’s appointment of 15 officials while sidestepping Senate confirmation would make it more difficult to get bipartisan support for future legislation. **** Bipartisan support?snerk Best advice...tell the congressional Republicans to go **** up a rope. -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. And the same advice when the Republican's get a majority? They are supposed to represent the people, not their party! Well, in the case of banks, GM and the civil service, they get to vote for big debt-taxing government. Most likely democrats for more debt. If you get an e-mail from deplum asking for Walker Bay info, just mention her eyes. Don't say anything else. Which Larry is this? The gentleman or the scum bag, buttsniffing troll? My guess is the latter. Relax. Health care bill passed. Republican party is dead meat. Time to celebrate. If booze makes you mean, try grass instead. |
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, wrote: On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and stop listening to nut jobs. They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work. I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November. Yep, need a little churn in DC. Most people have been against the big bailout, massive debt and health care. Going to be interesting to see how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared and trying to duck their track records. Big bailout. You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush? Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to create TARP and bailout the banks. And when it came down to other uses, and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM & Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it. Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of TARP for GM & Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by democriters. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do. |
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:56:59 -0400, hk
wrote: Democrats Defend Appointments By JOSEPH BERGER A leading Republican predicted Sunday that President Obama’s appointment of 15 officials while sidestepping Senate confirmation would make it more difficult to get bipartisan support for future legislation. did he really say that? kind of like a rapist saying that his victim reporting the rape to the police would make it difficult for him to rape her in the future |
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:05:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and stop listening to nut jobs. nah. i predict the house, if not the senate, will go GOP this fall. the american people are suckers for a good myth, and the GOP has the myth that wall street, unregulated, is the best protection for people...after all, look what they've done for us in the last 3 years |
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and stop listening to nut jobs. They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work. I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November. Yep, need a little churn in DC. gee. the last group was churned after they burned down the economy Most people have been against the big bailout, massive debt and health care. except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the middle class. Going to be interesting to see how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared and trying to duck their track records. yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature. they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle class |
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:21:12 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush? Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to create TARP and bailout the banks. well, no. wall street has the economy gamed so we HAVE to bail them out. it's called 'moral hazard theory' and is standard economics you right wingers are just too stupid to know basic economics And when it came down to other uses, and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM & Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it. Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of TARP for GM & Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by democriters. and your solution is? oh. a financial meltdown with 25% middle class unemployment just as long as the rich are protected |
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
Larry wrote:
jps wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:34:43 -0500, Larry wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 28/03/2010 3:34 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message news Democrats Defend Appointments By JOSEPH BERGER A leading Republican predicted Sunday that President Obama’s appointment of 15 officials while sidestepping Senate confirmation would make it more difficult to get bipartisan support for future legislation. **** Bipartisan support?snerk Best advice...tell the congressional Republicans to go **** up a rope. -- Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it. And the same advice when the Republican's get a majority? They are supposed to represent the people, not their party! Well, in the case of banks, GM and the civil service, they get to vote for big debt-taxing government. Most likely democrats for more debt. If you get an e-mail from deplum asking for Walker Bay info, just mention her eyes. Don't say anything else. Which Larry is this? The gentleman or the scum bag, buttsniffing troll? My guess is the latter. Relax. Health care bill passed. Republican party is dead meat. Time to celebrate. If booze makes you mean, try grass instead. You should get Giganews. Your stalking will be more believable. |
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On 28/03/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:21:12 -0600, wrote: On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush? Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to create TARP and bailout the banks. well, no. wall street has the economy gamed so we HAVE to bail them out. it's called 'moral hazard theory' and is standard economics you right wingers are just too stupid to know basic economics And when it came down to other uses, and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM& Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it. Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of TARP for GM& Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by democriters. and your solution is? oh. a financial meltdown with 25% middle class unemployment just as long as the rich are protected My recomendation is the same as it would be for gangrene. Chop the dead parts off so the host survives and hopefully recovers. But by allowing it to grow and consume more of the hosts resources, death would otherwise occur. This is a similar situation. Far too many resources going to the symptoms and not enough to the cause. A death spiral. One way or another this insane debt-spend-debt-spend cycle will end and not a damned thing the mesiah Obama is going to do about it. You might want to think about the next recession, I thinks we are into a back to back recession. Numbers for new forclosures are up big time already this year. And if interest rates don't go up you might find the greenback becomes toilet paper. Tough times ahead for debtors. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do. |
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Funniest first paragraph in a news story...
On 28/03/2010 5:42 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, wrote: On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and stop listening to nut jobs. They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work. I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November. Yep, need a little churn in DC. gee. the last group was churned after they burned down the economy Most people have been against the big bailout, massive debt and health care. except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the middle class. Going to be interesting to see how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared and trying to duck their track records. yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature. they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle class No need to protect the rich. Since they didn't over extend themselves, saved during fat times, losing a job was just an event like a rainy day. Like when I got the RIF in 2008. Had a job 2 weeks after I started looking, my wife was bored of my being at home. But to debt mongers, losing a job is a wipeout. You know the type, they become bitter, selfish and envious of those with money. The reality is many a hype talkers, BSers and debt mongers are getting wiped out slowly, but surely. But those having conservative financial values are doing quite well. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good news story | General | |||
Funniest news story of the week | General | |||
Sell your funniest fishing story for $100...... | General | |||
Here's a Story You Will Never See On Fox News | General | |||
Good News story.. | General |