![]() |
|
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, hk
wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... Holy crap. Out of the thousands of boats designed, engineered and manufactured, he could only site Navigator? I didn't say that. You did. I asked him what boat, (of that relative size) based on his years of experience of running boats up and down the east coast, in all kinds of conditions, would he choose to make the trip in if he had the choice. And then he backed it up with reasons and examples. They are not important here because you wouldn't be interested. You really shouldn't try to spin a comment into something other than what it was. Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:24:33 -0400, anon-e-moose wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch You are wasting your time trying to sell the merits of that boat to JPS. He couldn't afford one even if he mortgaged his house and sold his girls into slavery. Is that how you finance your boats? What boat have you? The last boat I bought was with cash. Tolly 40 sundeck in pristine condition. Tollycraft built a nice boat. Not my style, but they are well built. Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... My next is the Tollycraft 44 (or 45 later) can be had reasonably on the east coast and, although they don't have the kind of engine room the larger Navigators have, they are seaworthy and very well built. Everything is glassed in, the hulls are thick, hand laid, dead rise is significant enough to give it excellent seakeeping abilities. They were given either 3208s or Detroit 8.2s. And, to me it's good looking. The 48 is also worth noting. Ah yes. DD 3208s. Throwaway diesels. Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... You give yourself too much credit. I was moored next to one and invited aboard for three years. Wow. Did they let you sit at the helm chair too? Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On 3/24/10 12:04 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. There's not much dumber than a duck, unless, of course, it is a right-wing duck. :) |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
jps wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. Read for content, the Duck didn't write that. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:09:40 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . Holy crap. Out of the thousands of boats designed, engineered and manufactured, he could only site Navigator? I didn't say that. You did. I asked him what boat, (of that relative size) based on his years of experience of running boats up and down the east coast, in all kinds of conditions, would he choose to make the trip in if he had the choice. And then he backed it up with reasons and examples. They are not important here because you wouldn't be interested. You really shouldn't try to spin a comment into something other than what it was. Eisboch I didn't spin anything. I would have asked him what else he liked and hoped that he'd mention something with some style and grace. It is a boat after all, not a barge. One of the greatest pleasures I have found in boat ownership is admiring the lines and grace of the boat's design, as well as its construction, layout and operation. It helps make the maintenance go easier. I wouldn't want to wash and wax something I considered ugly. Make any sense? |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:13:02 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . My next is the Tollycraft 44 (or 45 later) can be had reasonably on the east coast and, although they don't have the kind of engine room the larger Navigators have, they are seaworthy and very well built. Everything is glassed in, the hulls are thick, hand laid, dead rise is significant enough to give it excellent seakeeping abilities. They were given either 3208s or Detroit 8.2s. And, to me it's good looking. The 48 is also worth noting. Ah yes. DD 3208s. Throwaway diesels. Eisboch That's a religious argument. They're also available with the Detroit 8.2, or 671s. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 11:50 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:54:53 -0400, wrote: On 3/24/10 7:39 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Yeah, Tim and I have talked about that. What do you think it is that makes almost exclusively the "far left" members of this (and most other groups I frequent) group so vulgar and determined to destroy any functioning group they visit? I mean, you look at the most vulgar here, you have Slammer, Harry, JPS, spewing every shocking, pathetic, vulgar, insult at anybody that tries to post here, it's a pattern with the far left, you can't deny it... Scotty You talked to Tim about it? Did Tim bring up the dozens of posts of yours that are full of vulgarities and insults? I'll bet he didn't. *Far* left? Me? JPS? Slammer? That's hilarious, and further proof that when brains were handed out, you were in the kitchen, wrenching on your motorbike. Yes, I'm a tree hugger and a yuppie, all at the same time. A multipurpose target for the righties, most of which in here are the inverse of tree huggers. I'm a fiscal moderate and a social liberal. Seems to fit the description of most sentient beings, save for the idiots herein who subscribe to "**** you, I don't care if I've got mine, I'm defending those that do." Scotty is a teabagger in a girlie hairdo. You fiscal moderate social libs like jps, krause, plume and the rest want to keep your own money and spend other folks money on your feel good social programs. **** all of you. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:15:16 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . You give yourself too much credit. I was moored next to one and invited aboard for three years. Wow. Did they let you sit at the helm chair too? Eisboch Yes, I grabbed the wheel and went back and forth and said "wheeee" just to impress the owner, who has sold Microsoft vestment to purchase. That boat was for sale a couple of years later for a ****load less than what he paid. His stock wasn't worth what it once was, neither was his boat. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... I'm 10 to 15 years behind him and on my way to a similar business event that'll liquidate my ownership, maybe more or less but that matters not. When I was 10 to 15 years from my "event" I couldn't imagine it happening let alone see it coming or plan for it. You must be smart. Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:42:18 -0400, hk
wrote: On 3/24/10 8:34 AM, Don White wrote: wrote in message m... On 3/23/10 9:18 PM, Eisboch wrote: Sounds like the type that was on the last boat I had and had to replace. Big honking hoses. The engines were the MercCruiser (GM) 454ci and the hoses that ran from the risers to the mufflers were either 4" or 6" diameter. (can't remember). The boat yard where I bought the boat located and installed them. I never liked that boat. Sold it. Now boatless. Miss the Navigator. Eisboch Considering your previous taste in boats, I never could figure out why you bought that last boat. I would have kept the little GB if it were in good shape, since it seemed well-found and also satisfied your need for creature comforts when "bach'ing" it. There were a few American Tugs or whatever that other brand is for sale at a local boatyard. Looked lightly used. You ever look 'em over? If I could convince the Crown Corp I worked for to double my modest pension, that's the type of boat I'd take command of. Up here, we need something seaworthy& comfortable for coastal cruising... especially with a somewhat short, usually damp, boating season. I liked the looks of that Navigator...looked "shippy" to me. As in Disney floating hotel? |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, hk wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. Read for content, the Duck didn't write that. Matters not to krawsee. He'll attack anyone that isn't on board with Oh-bammy's save the unions screw everyone else plan. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:37:29 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . I'm 10 to 15 years behind him and on my way to a similar business event that'll liquidate my ownership, maybe more or less but that matters not. When I was 10 to 15 years from my "event" I couldn't imagine it happening let alone see it coming or plan for it. You must be smart. Eisboch Thanks Richard. Perhaps not as smart as you but I'm still working on it. We're in an industry that's getting a lot of attention. Our technology helps integrate disparate technologies that weren't designed or engineered to work with others. Silos. Being able to aggregate technical capabiities from different manufacturers is attractive to those having to choose the best fit for specific requirements. It's reasonable to assume that any number of companies who operate in this space will find that capability attractive and want to own it or keep it from the hands of competitors. I don't care which. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
|
exhaust hose...with or without wire
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 12:04 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. There's not much dumber than a duck, unless, of course, it is a right-wing duck. :) This duck has two wings and they both function. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On 3/24/10 1:24 PM, D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote: On 3/24/10 12:04 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:27:30 -0400, wrote: On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote: D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. You can tell that the duck keeps a sharp eye on things. So much so that he doesn't know how to spell Richard's handle. There's not much dumber than a duck, unless, of course, it is a right-wing duck. :) This duck has two wings and they both function. Really? You must keep the other wing hidden. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On 3/24/10 1:26 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
Isn't this the same guy who asked Dick if the "guy could only *site* Navigator"? Pfffft. I love it when the pseudo-intellectuals try to be spelling cops. Scotty Q. With your pre-existing heart condition and hospital history, how did you obtain ordinary health insurance, as you claimed here? A. You didn't. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
All in all to try to get back on track here.
Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do be3cause it's obviosly not a pressurized system . If it can save you some bread. If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
Tim wrote:
All in all to try to get back on track here. Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do be3cause it's obviosly not a pressurized system . If it can save you some bread. If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. The wire reinforced hose keeps it rigid so that it wont sag and possibly present a hot spot problem. Long straight runs generally require the wire reinforced hose. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:09:40 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. Holy crap. Out of the thousands of boats designed, engineered and manufactured, he could only site Navigator? I didn't say that. You did. I asked him what boat, (of that relative size) based on his years of experience of running boats up and down the east coast, in all kinds of conditions, would he choose to make the trip in if he had the choice. And then he backed it up with reasons and examples. They are not important here because you wouldn't be interested. You really shouldn't try to spin a comment into something other than what it was. Eisboch I didn't spin anything. I would have asked him what else he liked and hoped that he'd mention something with some style and grace. It is a boat after all, not a barge. One of the greatest pleasures I have found in boat ownership is admiring the lines and grace of the boat's design, as well as its construction, layout and operation. It helps make the maintenance go easier. I wouldn't want to wash and wax something I considered ugly. Make any sense? To a point. When I was shopping for a larger, live-aboard type boat I was equally interested in the engineering aspects of the boat, how well it was constructed and how it handled and rode in various sea states. At the time I had dreams of doing a lot of ocean going travel. Didn't exactly work out as planned for other reasons, but that was the critera at the time for boat selection. The delivery captain told me the following story when I asked him what boat he would pick for an offshore type trip: He had been hired by many different people over the years ... dealers and private owners ..... to run boats up and down the coast and had experience in virtually all the name brands. He was bringing the Navigator up from Florida for a local dealer. As you are probably aware, these guys typically have a qualified person to run the boat with them on these runs and they run 24 hours a day, stopping only for refueling. He was coming up the coast in the fall and was running a mile or so behind a similarly sized Hatteras that was being delivered by another delivery captain who he knew. The seas were becoming increasingly rough and, as the saying goes, both boats were taking it "on the nose". They were communicating by radio and the Hatteras captain indicated he was backing off on the throttle more and more as the seas worsened. The guy in the Navigator was not in any discomfort in the same seas and was slowly gaining on the Hatteras. Finally, as he passed him, the captain of the Hatteras fell in behind the Navigator, riding in it's wake. That's why I decided to buy the Navigator after looking at many boats. Eisboch |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:28:56 -0400, hk
wrote: On 3/24/10 1:26 PM, I am Tosk wrote: Isn't this the same guy who asked Dick if the "guy could only *site* Navigator"? Pfffft. I love it when the pseudo-intellectuals try to be spelling cops. Scotty Q. With your pre-existing heart condition and hospital history, how did you obtain ordinary health insurance, as you claimed here? A. You didn't. As if Snotty is in a position to determine what is intellectual. Maybe his daughter will clue him in someday if she her brain doesn't get mashed too many times. Maybe he's hoping she'll turn out to be a chip off the old block. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:14:04 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:09:40 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Holy crap. Out of the thousands of boats designed, engineered and manufactured, he could only site Navigator? I didn't say that. You did. I asked him what boat, (of that relative size) based on his years of experience of running boats up and down the east coast, in all kinds of conditions, would he choose to make the trip in if he had the choice. And then he backed it up with reasons and examples. They are not important here because you wouldn't be interested. You really shouldn't try to spin a comment into something other than what it was. Eisboch I didn't spin anything. I would have asked him what else he liked and hoped that he'd mention something with some style and grace. It is a boat after all, not a barge. One of the greatest pleasures I have found in boat ownership is admiring the lines and grace of the boat's design, as well as its construction, layout and operation. It helps make the maintenance go easier. I wouldn't want to wash and wax something I considered ugly. Make any sense? To a point. When I was shopping for a larger, live-aboard type boat I was equally interested in the engineering aspects of the boat, how well it was constructed and how it handled and rode in various sea states. At the time I had dreams of doing a lot of ocean going travel. Didn't exactly work out as planned for other reasons, but that was the critera at the time for boat selection. The delivery captain told me the following story when I asked him what boat he would pick for an offshore type trip: He had been hired by many different people over the years ... dealers and private owners ..... to run boats up and down the coast and had experience in virtually all the name brands. He was bringing the Navigator up from Florida for a local dealer. As you are probably aware, these guys typically have a qualified person to run the boat with them on these runs and they run 24 hours a day, stopping only for refueling. He was coming up the coast in the fall and was running a mile or so behind a similarly sized Hatteras that was being delivered by another delivery captain who he knew. The seas were becoming increasingly rough and, as the saying goes, both boats were taking it "on the nose". They were communicating by radio and the Hatteras captain indicated he was backing off on the throttle more and more as the seas worsened. The guy in the Navigator was not in any discomfort in the same seas and was slowly gaining on the Hatteras. Finally, as he passed him, the captain of the Hatteras fell in behind the Navigator, riding in it's wake. That's why I decided to buy the Navigator after looking at many boats. Eisboch It's a nice anecdote to support your purchase although you don't mention model, size, year of Hatt. I suppose I'm too hung up on the looks to consider that which I don't feel is attractive -- like picking a wife with a great personality and body but a face like a trucker. Shoot me, I have some vanity. I'm sure the Navigator could be compared favorably to a number of yachts capable of excellent seakeeping. If you were having thoughts of motoring oceans, why not consider the long range trawlers that are so popular? Too slow? |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Mar 24, 12:08*pm, anon-e-moose wrote:
Tim wrote: All in all to try to get back on track here. Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do because it's obviosly not a pressurized system *. If it can save you some bread. *If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. The wire reinforced hose keeps it rigid so that it wont sag and possibly present a hot spot problem. Long straight runs generally require the wire reinforced hose. Yeah, I forgot about the long runs. So, I'd say you're probably right. But then again. I wonder which design of hose was origional equipment and which was the replacement? |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
Tim wrote:
On Mar 24, 12:08 pm, anon-e-moose wrote: Tim wrote: All in all to try to get back on track here. Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do because it's obviosly not a pressurized system . If it can save you some bread. If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. The wire reinforced hose keeps it rigid so that it wont sag and possibly present a hot spot problem. Long straight runs generally require the wire reinforced hose. Yeah, I forgot about the long runs. So, I'd say you're probably right. But then again. I wonder which design of hose was origional equipment and which was the replacement? Which looks older? |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote: That's about all you do here, quacker...troll. And 99% of the drivel you post here is what? Very good. Most here would have said dribble. Nice to see a poster with education, paying attention to what he says. I do believe you are the intellectual of rec.boats. That you seldom post here tends to confirm that. Jim - Easing off bashing dumb libs for a moment. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Mar 24, 1:26*pm, anon-e-moose wrote:
Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 12:08 pm, anon-e-moose wrote: Tim wrote: All in all to try to get back on track here. Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do because it's obviosly not a pressurized system *. If it can save you some bread. *If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. The wire reinforced hose keeps it rigid so that it wont sag and possibly present a hot spot problem. Long straight runs generally require the wire reinforced hose. Yeah, I forgot about the long runs. *So, I'd say you're probably right. But then again. I wonder which design of hose was origional equipment and which was the replacement? Which looks older? True to a degree. If the inferior hose is baked and 'weather cracked' etc. I suppose it could look older. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Mar 24, 1:26*pm, anon-e-moose wrote:
Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 12:08 pm, anon-e-moose wrote: Tim wrote: All in all to try to get back on track here. Bob, I would think that if the non meshed hose worked fine it should do because it's obviosly not a pressurized system *. If it can save you some bread. *If it's not a large diffrence in price, then go with the better stuff. The wire reinforced hose keeps it rigid so that it wont sag and possibly present a hot spot problem. Long straight runs generally require the wire reinforced hose. Yeah, I forgot about the long runs. *So, I'd say you're probably right. But then again. I wonder which design of hose was origional equipment and which was the replacement? Which looks older? I jsut went out to the barn to look at rthe engine from my old Chris craft and the rubber hoses were sill attached to the manifolds. They are a very thick rubber hose which reminds me of hydrolic hose. The type with the rib ply's on the outside. or you might say like a tire turned insid out. There is no steel mesh or evidence of a spring inside. And they were origional from 1964. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:13:02 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... My next is the Tollycraft 44 (or 45 later) can be had reasonably on the east coast and, although they don't have the kind of engine room the larger Navigators have, they are seaworthy and very well built. Everything is glassed in, the hulls are thick, hand laid, dead rise is significant enough to give it excellent seakeeping abilities. They were given either 3208s or Detroit 8.2s. And, to me it's good looking. The 48 is also worth noting. Ah yes. DD 3208s. Throwaway diesels. Eisboch That's a Cat 3208. Four stroke as opposed to Detroit's two strokes. I have heard the throw away line too. I have seen them outlast the running time meter. I have also seen Detroits that wear out piston seals and suck the crankcase oil. Run off until the crank goes out the bottom of the block. That is also a throw away, along with the boat in some cases. Key is maintance. |
exhaust hose...with or without wire
On Mar 25, 8:59*am, Bubba wrote:
That's a Cat 3208. Four stroke as opposed to Detroit's two strokes. I have heard the throw away line too. I have seen them outlast the running time meter. I have also seen Detroits that wear out piston seals and suck the crankcase oil. Run off until the crank goes out the bottom of the block. That is also a throw away, along with the boat in some cases. Key is maintance.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The 8.2 Detroit was actually a v-8 naturally aspirated 4 cycle. It was reliable and was actually built to combat against the IH DT 466. But the DT 466 was still better. Really , It was a bigger engine but the detroit 8.2 was an over grown version of the 6.2.. They did the job but with no frills. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com