Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk
wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 11:32*am, Jack wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. *Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 11:40*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:32*am, Jack wrote: On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. *Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". And notice it ends "are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The new HCB takes certain rights and powers from the States or people and gives them to the Federal government. That's what the 10th Admendment says they aren't supposed to do. Besides, you saying something doesn't make it true, even if you capitalize it. I quoted the opinion of a Constitutional Law Instructor and Lawyer... I'll take his word over yours. What is your degree in again? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/22/10 12:15 PM, Jack wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:40 am, wrote: On Mar 22, 11:32 am, wrote: On Mar 22, 9:25 am, wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57 pm, I am wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". And notice it ends "are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The new HCB takes certain rights and powers from the States or people and gives them to the Federal government. That's what the 10th Admendment says they aren't supposed to do. Besides, you saying something doesn't make it true, even if you capitalize it. I quoted the opinion of a Constitutional Law Instructor and Lawyer... I'll take his word over yours. What is your degree in again? I suggest you and your state secede in protest. It'll be fun to watch SC turn into Haiti without those federal payments. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 12:15*pm, Jack wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:40*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 22, 11:32*am, Jack wrote: On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. *Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". And notice it ends "are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." *The new HCB takes certain rights and powers from the States or people and gives them to the Federal government. *That's what the 10th Admendment says they aren't supposed to do. Besides, you saying something doesn't make it true, even if you capitalize it. *I quoted the opinion of a Constitutional Law Instructor and Lawyer... I'll take his word over yours. *What is your degree in again?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cite? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 12:15*pm, Jack wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:40*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 22, 11:32*am, Jack wrote: On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. *Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". And notice it ends "are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." *The new HCB takes certain rights and powers from the States or people and gives them to the Federal government. *That's what the 10th Admendment says they aren't supposed to do. Besides, you saying something doesn't make it true, even if you capitalize it. *I quoted the opinion of a Constitutional Law Instructor and Lawyer... I'll take his word over yours. *What is your degree in again?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "Arguments that public health care would be a violation of the Constitution are both pointless and misleading. While the Constitution does not explicitly call for a right to health care (unless you choose to interpret the right to life in that manner, which is another discussion entirely), these arguments miss the whole point on two counts. First, the Constitution was penned at a time when labor was in demand and health care, such as it was, was affordable to anyone who was productively employed. Much has changed since the 18th century. Health care has advanced significantly, and costs more due to the treatments that are now available (and which couldn’t even be imagined when the Constitution was written) as well as the current structure of our health care system. For a number of reasons it is not always possible to make enough to afford modern health care out of pocket. In short, it is a different America we live in than it was during the time of the Founding Fathers. The Constitution was never meant to be a static document; amendments were made from the start. This is not to say that a Constitutional amendment is necessary. A society that is as rich as ours can afford health care for its citizens if it can afford military adventurism in Iraq and other unnecessary spending. It is a matter of setting proper priorities and eliminating the inefficiencies, insurance company greed, and corruption in the current health care system. Virtually every other rich nation has a public health care system, and yes, they work at least as well as ours on average. We already have a publicly funded health care system for retirees, the military, and government employees; it’s time to stop excluding the rest of us" |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 1:01*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 22, 12:15*pm, Jack wrote: On Mar 22, 11:40*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 22, 11:32*am, Jack wrote: On Mar 22, 9:25*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 21, 10:57*pm, I am Tosk wrote: ... at 10:45 pm the constitution was shredded. Pray for America, pray for our children. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v What part of the Constitution and how was it shredded? For starters: "The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people; How did healthcare reform (which was voted on and passed) shred this? The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. *Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control." Attempts at insults and name-calling aside, I don't beleive that anyone can seriously deny that the above is happening. Health care reform has done nothing to the above. NOTHING. Notice, if you willl that the passage starts as "The powers NOT delegated to the US or the Constitution.....". And notice it ends "are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." *The new HCB takes certain rights and powers from the States or people and gives them to the Federal government. *That's what the 10th Admendment says they aren't supposed to do. Besides, you saying something doesn't make it true, even if you capitalize it. *I quoted the opinion of a Constitutional Law Instructor and Lawyer... I'll take his word over yours. *What is your degree in again?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "Arguments that public health care would be a violation of the Constitution are both pointless and misleading. While the Constitution does not explicitly call for a right to health care (unless you choose to interpret the right to life in that manner, which is another discussion entirely), these arguments miss the whole point on two counts. First, the Constitution was penned at a time when labor was in demand and health care, such as it was, was affordable to anyone who was productively employed. Much has changed since the 18th century. Health care has advanced significantly, and costs more due to the treatments that are now available (and which couldn’t even be imagined when the Constitution was written) as well as the current structure of our health care system. For a number of reasons it is not always possible to make enough to afford modern health care out of pocket. In short, it is a different America we live in than it was during the time of the Founding Fathers. The Constitution was never meant to be a static document; amendments were made from the start. This is not to say that a Constitutional amendment is necessary. A society that is as rich as ours can afford health care for its citizens if it can afford military adventurism in Iraq and other unnecessary spending. It is a matter of setting proper priorities and eliminating the inefficiencies, insurance company greed, and corruption in the current health care system. Virtually every other rich nation has a public health care system, and yes, they work at least as well as ours on average. We already have a publicly funded health care system for retirees, the military, and government employees; it’s time to stop excluding the rest of us" Interesting, but notice that your quoted text never makes the argument that the HCB *doesn't* violate the Constitution, but rather argues that while it does, it's necessary and even OK to do so for various reasons. Thanks for making my point. Understand that I think that healthcare costs are excessive, and that action of some kind is needed to bring things back under control. However, this HCB was not the answer, was not wanted by a majority of Americans, and will not be in the best interests of the US. It's a screwed-up piece of legislation that is as far away from open and transparent government as you can get. But that's no surprise either. How are those Social Security bennies holding out? You plan on any of those when you retire? I know I'm not banking on it. Yet we want to turn over health care to the same DC idiots? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1973946a-8612-4533-a247-
, says... The Constitution was never meant to be a static document; Really? amendments were made from the start. Yes, static, that's why they made a provision to change it... This is not to say that a Constitutional amendment is necessary. Which you seem to have little regard or need for anyway. society that is as rich as ours can afford health care for its citizens if it can afford military adventurism in Iraq and other unnecessary spending. So, **** the Constitution, this is for ideology and the progressive agenda so it's ok to sidestep the process every which way possible.. Who'd a thunk snerk Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NI: B2 Portavogie Harbour 20-03-2010 | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NI: B11 Ardglass Harbour 17-03-2010 | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NI: N.961 Kilkeel Harbour 17-03-2010 | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Anyone in Ixtapa, Mexico area March 25 - March 30 2010? | Cruising | |||
Black Point - Big Majors - March 21 - March 26, 2009 | Cruising |