Is Scott in D.C.?
 

Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.




--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

hk wrote:
Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.


To desire something you can't afford while siding with those who will
ensure it remains unattainable is one of the delicious ironies of the
human experience.
Never heard of unrequited love?
It is sad you are not sophisticated enough to understand this.

Jim - Can see the depth in transparency.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On 21/03/2010 1:49 PM, hk wrote:
Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.

Funny, everyone wants money no object health care, and how many think
they don't have to pay for it.

300 years ago it was a much more simple experience, here is your herion
or cocaine and have a good time.

Today, freeload and then say, hey, everyone else should pay for me.

And people wonder why America's economy is failing.

Good part is, those who wish for the governemnt to manage their lives
like slaves, they might get their wish.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:59:21 -0500, Jim wrote:




To desire something you can't afford while siding with those who will
ensure it remains unattainable is one of the delicious ironies of the
human experience.

now lemme get this straight...

a middle class working stiff works hard all his life

pays taxes

never causes trouble....

but because wall street decides a banker needs a $10M bonus....

this stiff gets denied healthcare...and you say he hasnt earned it...

gee....who could ever imagine the right hates working people?

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:19:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/03/2010 1:49 PM, hk wrote:
Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.

Funny, everyone wants money no object health care, and how many think
they don't have to pay for it.

uh no. what we want is a fair dollar for a fair day's work. in the
last decade, productivity has increased about 30%.

amount of that that showed up in increased wages?

zero.

but wall street did just fine, thank you.

and that says it all. canuck weeps that the rich cant rape the working
folks by denying them healthcare...


300 years ago it was a much more simple experience, here is your herion
or cocaine and have a good time.

Today, freeload and then say, hey, everyone else should pay for me.

And people wonder why America's economy is failing.

it's failing because wall street is run by thieves and thugs...your
kind of people....

NOT because middle america isn't working hard enough


Good part is, those who wish for the governemnt to manage their lives
like slaves, they might get their wish


as if health care is 'running ' someone's life

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

In article ,
says...

On 21/03/2010 1:49 PM, hk wrote:
Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.

Funny, everyone wants money no object health care, and how many think
they don't have to pay for it.

300 years ago it was a much more simple experience, here is your herion
or cocaine and have a good time.

Today, freeload and then say, hey, everyone else should pay for me.

And people wonder why America's economy is failing.

Good part is, those who wish for the governemnt to manage their lives
like slaves, they might get their wish.

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost (pretty much
what an insurance company would have paid them), and owning two houses,
it was not hard to get a loan to pay the hospital. Now I have better
coverage so it's no longer an issue. Let Harry, Slammer, JPS and their
crew keep up the lies, notice they keep doing it from under their desks?

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:



**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On 3/21/10 6:21 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 21/03/2010 1:49 PM, hk wrote:
Watching and listening to some of the opponents of health care insurance
reform...

One teabagger says he is opposed to the bills and any government
involvement in health insurance reform. He was upset that medicare made
health care a right for seniors. He further stated he and his wife had
no health insurance because they could not afford it. Further, he said
he hoped to have health insurance some day, but not because of
government action.

Sounds like Ingersoll to me. Part of the wingnut nation.

Funny, everyone wants money no object health care, and how many think
they don't have to pay for it.

300 years ago it was a much more simple experience, here is your herion
or cocaine and have a good time.

Today, freeload and then say, hey, everyone else should pay for me.

And people wonder why America's economy is failing.

Good part is, those who wish for the governemnt to manage their lives
like slaves, they might get their wish.

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost (pretty much
what an insurance company would have paid them), and owning two houses,
it was not hard to get a loan to pay the hospital. Now I have better
coverage so it's no longer an issue. Let Harry, Slammer, JPS and their
crew keep up the lies, notice they keep doing it from under their desks?

Scotty




Scotty's bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.
Who would cover you with your pre-existing conditions?

Oh...I'm not under any desk...

--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On 3/21/10 6:24 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:



**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

SnottyScotty's lying...again.

--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On Mar 21, 6:35*pm, hk wrote:
On 3/21/10 6:24 PM, bpuharic wrote:





On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
*wrote:

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

SnottyScotty's lying...again.

--

Harry accusing others of lying....now THAT'S a keeper!! How's that
Yale degree?

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

In article 7eba9866-fef9-45d8-a22d-a75277e421f3
@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 21, 6:35*pm, hk wrote:
On 3/21/10 6:24 PM, bpuharic wrote:





On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
*wrote:

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

SnottyScotty's lying...again.

--

Harry accusing others of lying....now THAT'S a keeper!! How's that
Yale degree?

Oh, Harry is funny all right. He is bitching at me for working the
system to get a better price, huh? A year or so back he invited me to
contact his room mate to "work the system" for me.. Must be she gets
some kind of kickback or commission. It's always about other peoples
money and being in the middle doing nothing and skimming money that
suits Harry proper I guess. Kind of like his union work...snerk. I do
not apologize for negotiating with the Hospital on my own.

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On 3/22/10 8:58 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article7eba9866-fef9-45d8-a22d-a75277e421f3
@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 21, 6:35 pm, wrote:
On 3/21/10 6:24 PM, bpuharic wrote:





On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

SnottyScotty's lying...again.

--

Harry accusing others of lying....now THAT'S a keeper!! How's that
Yale degree?

Oh, Harry is funny all right. He is bitching at me for working the
system to get a better price, huh? A year or so back he invited me to
contact his room mate to "work the system" for me.. Must be she gets
some kind of kickback or commission. It's always about other peoples
money and being in the middle doing nothing and skimming money that
suits Harry proper I guess. Kind of like his union work...snerk. I do
not apologize for negotiating with the Hospital on my own.

Scotty


I think it is possible but not likely you were able to negotiate the
amount of your outstanding bill to that hospital. Not likely because you
are not a particularly competent person. If you got a break, maybe your
wife arranged it. Surely, she is more competent than you.

Tell us, genius, when someone arranges "hardship" prescriptions for you
that involve you paying the Rx manufacturer nothing or next to nothing,
why would you think a commission is paid? Suppose you needed a 90-day
supply of, oh, say Lipitor, an Rx that runs about $400, and that it
would have a year's worth of refills before you needed to see the doctor
again. Suppose you got that Lipitor for $5 instead of $400. Who gets the
commission?

You are the very model of a moron.

BTW, yesterday you stated you now have health insurance. If you do, it
sure isn't standard health insurance. No insurer would write you a
policy for standard insurance with your health history and recent
hospitalization.

But...thanks to the Democrats, they'll have to do so in the future.

Is Scott in D.C.?
 

On 3/22/10 8:54 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 21, 6:35 pm, wrote:
On 3/21/10 6:24 PM, bpuharic wrote:





On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

**** Harry, he is a liar. Yes, I did not have the coverage I needed last
year and worked up a pretty good bill. With the co-operation of the
hospital we were able to knock it down to a reasonable cost

IOW they billed me to pay for your freeloading...and then you have the
balls to complain about socialized medicine.

the reason they could lower the cost is that they bill my insurance
company for the amount you don't pay

lazy assed *******. you should have either not gotten treated or paid
your own way.

SnottyScotty's lying...again.

--

Harry accusing others of lying....now THAT'S a keeper!! How's that
Yale degree?


Are you claiming you are not Kevin Noble?