On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:31:16 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:51:55 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...

The plan they are voting on is nothing like either of these. It really
isn't a plan at all. The fact that Obama wants it passed, with the
admission that they will tweak it later, ****es me off. This is
unprecedented. He's on some personal time frame and doesn't seem to
really care what the meat of the plan is.


I feel the same way. I've been watching interviews with some of the
Congress members who are on the fence regarding their vote on Sunday.
Most are still seeking specific definitions of certain details of "the
plan".

It has been debated for a year and they still aren't sure what they are
voting for?

In the end it will pass due to an enormous amount of arm twisting and
backroom deals. Heh. One member of Congress was calling this bill
"the most transparent" proposal (to the public) that he had ever
witnessed in his 40 years of elected office. But when pressed for
specific answers, he still wasn't sure exactly what some parts of the
bill were, what the language meant or what the ramifications would be.

But, he's leaning towards a "Yes".

Eisboch

And, Obama is pushing it through... how's that? Is he using The Force?

You really need to stop listening to Rush/Beck/Rove.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually I was watching Chris Matthews on MSNBC. I don't even know what
channel Fox News is on and, other than newsclips, have never listened to
Rush.

Eisboch

You may be listening to Beck or Rush but you do an excellent job of
channeling their thoughts. Great minds, you know...

Whoops, meant to say you may "not" be listening. ****ed up a
perfectly good comeback.